Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 03 Oct 2007 (Wednesday) 15:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

how much pp before the hand over?

 
mmahoney
Goldmember
Avatar
2,789 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Oct 03, 2007 19:28 |  #16

Phil V wrote in post #4058266 (external link)
I've said it before, but the most effective and underused post processing trick is simply the delete key.

Amen to that .. 200 quality photos in the hands of a full day coverage couple from maybe 600-700 photos taken during the day is where I'd like to be.

Lower numbers and higher quality is my objective.
Mike


Newfoundland Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jkloef
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
228 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
     
Oct 03, 2007 19:48 as a reply to  @ post 4059001 |  #17

Kai- I use lightroom for pretty much everything unless the photo needs major work. Love it!

Tim- This sounds like what I have been doing so far, I like pp and am very impressed with what a lot of people put on here but tend to prefer a simpler style when it comes to my own photos. Do you doll them up a bit more before putting them in the album or is what you see what you get? (Don't get me wrong here I love what I see on your site I am just curious as to if album pics get special attention).


Krista
www.loefflerphotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
taygull
Goldmember
Avatar
3,091 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: McKinney, TX
     
Oct 03, 2007 19:53 |  #18

I will adjust images but I'm not going to spend a bunch of time on 200-300 images.

What I do is create a gallery for each part of the wedding and then I have a separate gallery for "Artist Favorites". These are the ones I prefer and I will spend as much time as I need to work up these 20 or so images. My clients then can decide which images they like and I will then work on them....if that is included in the contract. I will do all the basic conversion of the raw files with tweaking levels, color balance and fix anything obvious on all images before they see them. I'm just not going to do my "artist work" on all the keepers.


www.chrisfritchiestudi​os.com (external link)
McKinney, TX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sblais
I am silly
Avatar
3,532 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa, ON (Canada, eh!)
     
Oct 03, 2007 19:54 |  #19

As little as possible, but as much as needed.


Sebastien
| Gear List |

There are no great men, only great challenges that ordinary men are forced by circumstances to meet. -- Admiral William Halsey

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zorz
Senior Member
Avatar
349 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: NYC
     
Oct 03, 2007 20:02 |  #20

I take my experience from artistic portraiture background.

First, I backup all files from the CF cards and archive with no intent to return to them. Then, I make my own judgment on deleting the duplicates or imperfect photos - it simplifies the later selection process for all of us. About 30% go. In yet-to-happen case they remember something that I did not present to them as proofs (i.e., among those 30%), I'd go to the archive.

Then, I go through the remaining and rate them. Run automatic color and exposure correction on all of them - they become raw files (this is how I call them for the clients), implying very basic post-processing, prone to imperfections. I have no problems showing those because they have seen my finished works made in the past and know what they may become. I do take one sure photo and apply advanced post-processing, showcasing my manual color correction, retouching, and artistic effects. It serves as a personal example of "before and after".

I then present all the files to the clients, recommend about 50 of them (ranked highest), suitable for an album, show an example of my manual PP'ing on a single photo, and let them select those that they want to have carefully processed. I also suggest identifying 10 all-star photos to which I will apply my best knowledge and skill (samples). Those take 5-10 hours each and such an effort definitely cannot be expected on every photo of hundreds given...

Again, this is taken from my artistic portraiture approach. I know it wouldn't appeal to all customers but then, I don't have to get all the clients out there, either.


Ed, Zorz Studios (external link)
My introduction to POTN
1D Mk II N, 5D, 85mm L, 24-70mm L, 70-200mm L IS, 15mm fisheye, 50mm Mk I, Hensel Integra Pro monolights w/radio (3), 580EX II and 430X, Sekonic L-758DR, PocketWizards, Manfroto CF tripod, Wacom Intuos 3 6x11, EyeOne Display 2, Canon PIXMA Pro 9000

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BJ ­ Pulsipher
Member
158 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Oct 03, 2007 22:02 |  #21

I also divide the wedding into sections to make it more managable. I quit deciding which ranking to give pictures. I let my husband do that because I get too emotionally involved with the pics and his taste has a broader appeal. Then I work with those. It streamlines my work flow. Basic pp is included, extra stuff costs by the hour.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,669 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3304
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Oct 04, 2007 07:49 |  #22

colour correction, curves, saturation, any blotches, pimples etc, sharpening - swap the occaisonal face over etc ;)


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jkloef
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
228 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
     
Oct 04, 2007 16:00 |  #23

Thank you for all of the input! The artist favorites folder is a great idea that I may utilize. It is a good way of showing off your skills but still gives them the basic shot in case they aren't thrilled with the heavy pp.

Scott, just curious as to what you think of my new front page pic...better....worse.​...or about the same? Sometimes I think that I like the pics better since I know the whole story of what was happening at the time it was taken. It's difficult to be subjective on some of them! :)


Krista
www.loefflerphotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sierra_nova
Senior Member
Avatar
354 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
     
Oct 04, 2007 19:41 |  #24

All the images the bride and groom ever see are fully pp'd.

They have some options - anything in colour I will do black and white, they can ask for selective colouring, but essentially everything is done by the time they see it.

I do this for a few reasons - I see pp as part of my style, and part of what they bride and groom are paying me for. Also, all of my packages come with a DVD of all images set to music, and this is what they will be showing their family and friends while the album is in production, so I want my best foot forward so to speak.

If you cost your pp time into your packages, it really isn't an issue.

Cheers!
Naomi




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,394 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
how much pp before the hand over?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2139 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.