Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 03 Oct 2007 (Wednesday) 23:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

A little experiment - "Kit lens" vs. 17-55MM F/2.8 IS USM

 
Desertraptor
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,550 posts
Gallery: 212 photos
Likes: 395
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Oct 04, 2007 15:52 |  #16

REtail here the 17-55 is almost 2K which is why I went to the Tamron 17-50 at 1/4 the price. Minus IS of course but the shots are stunning out of the camera.


Peter
Canon 6D|60D|40D
Lens 10-22mm f2.8|50mm f 1.8|100mm f2.8 Macro

24-70mm f2.8|L100-400mm f4.5-5.6L
Flash 430EX II
Telescope Skywatcher 600mm ED80 f7.5 GEM EQ3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
farrukh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,969 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Lahore, Pakistan
     
Oct 04, 2007 16:37 |  #17

In2Photos wrote in post #4062029 (external link)
I'm sorry but where is the CA on the second?

You need pixel peeping faculty for this ;):lol:


5D Mark II + 40D | Lenses: Sigma 150-500mm BigmOS / Canon 24-105mm F4L IS / Canon 70-200 F4L IS / Canon 85mm 1.8 / Sigma Macro 70mm f/2.8 EX / Sigma 10-20mm EX / Canon 50mm f/1.8 II / Sigma 1.4x APO TC / Kenko 2x PRO300 DG. Lighting: Canon 580EX II + Metz 58 AF-1 + Sunpak 383...
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Troopa
Member
133 posts
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 04, 2007 20:36 |  #18

Desertraptor wrote in post #4064554 (external link)
REtail here the 17-55 is almost 2K which is why I went to the Tamron 17-50 at 1/4 the price. Minus IS of course but the shots are stunning out of the camera.

Im from melbourne travelling Canada atm and the price is $1279 on sale with the rebate of $200 available here

Its $999 from B&H in America with about $50 shipping..... Traveling sucks cause i have no damn money to spend on gear DAMNIT




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,555 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
A little experiment - "Kit lens" vs. 17-55MM F/2.8 IS USM
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1615 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.