Ansel Adams is turning over in his grave due some recent postings on internet forums these days.
God created dust, so it can't be that bad. Ask yourself this. What would Jesus do?
Lord_Malone Cream of the Manpanties........ Inventor Great POTN Photo Book 7,686 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 More info | Oct 04, 2007 16:12 | #16 Ansel Adams is turning over in his grave due some recent postings on internet forums these days. ~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KeithR Goldmember 2,856 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England More info | Oct 04, 2007 16:25 | #17 M24 wrote in post #4064614 I just spoke with Canon USA, the Virginia office, and they said that the sensor should not be dirty out of the box. Errmmm...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 04, 2007 16:29 | #18 40D kit is sold | G10 Love it!!! | 350D w/BG-E3 | EF-S 10-22 | 70-200 2.8L | Canon 1.4x II | Tammy 28-300 VC | B+W filters | Novoflex Magicball | 50D and 5D MKII on the way...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
racingsafetyman Member 220 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Northants, UK More info | I did the same thing and shot the sky straight out of the box - yes, it's got dust on the sensor, probably even more than the OP's. Taken some "real life" shots today and there's no sign of the dust. I'm not going to worry about it for now and maybe eventually I'll get round to giving it a wet clean if I start to see problems. Colin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hogloff Cream of the Crop 7,606 posts Likes: 416 Joined Apr 2003 Location: British Columbia More info | Oct 04, 2007 19:59 | #20 Permanent banJust bought a new car. Got it home and looked under the hood. Found oil all over the engine. Would you be pissed? After all, oil will get all over the engine so live with it. Why should we look at cameras any different? If Canon does not use clean rooms to manufacture their equipment, maybe they should. Personally, I'd be pissed if there was dust ( or worse yet oil ) on my sensor right out of the box. M24, stick to your guns and have Canon clean it to your satisfaction.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Littlefield Goldmember More info | Oct 04, 2007 20:29 | #21 M24 wrote: Yeah, who uses f/32 that often? Well, I don't, but on a tripod for still life, I use f/22 quite often. You do not get diffraction at f22 ? I guess it is different then XT I do not use over f16.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DDan Goldmember 1,725 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Oceanside, Calif. More info | Oct 04, 2007 20:34 | #22 Hogloff wrote in post #4065953 Just bought a new car. Got it home and looked under the hood. Found oil all over the engine. Would you be pissed? After all, oil will get all over the engine so live with it. Why should we look at cameras any different? If Canon does not use clean rooms to manufacture their equipment, maybe they should. Personally, I'd be pissed if there was dust ( or worse yet oil ) on my sensor right out of the box. M24, stick to your guns and have Canon clean it to your satisfaction. I don't completely understand this position. Even if it is completely clean right out of the box, more lube and dust is going to end up on the sensor with use. Who is responsible then? You have to eventually take responsibility for keeping it clean. What is one more cleaning? My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hogloff Cream of the Crop 7,606 posts Likes: 416 Joined Apr 2003 Location: British Columbia More info | Oct 04, 2007 20:58 | #23 Permanent banDDan wrote in post #4066161 I don't completely understand this position. Even if it is completely clean right out of the box, more lube and dust is going to end up on the sensor with use. Who is responsible then? You have to eventually take responsibility for keeping it clean. What is one more cleaning? To me, it is more the principle of the matter. I bought it new so I expect it clean. Maybe another car analogy: Would you mind buying a new car with a scratch on it? After all, you will get more scratches on it anyway.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Troopa Member 133 posts Joined Dec 2006 More info | Oct 04, 2007 21:00 | #24 DDan, If its dust after the fact then i have no trouble with your statement
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DDan Goldmember 1,725 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Oceanside, Calif. More info | Oct 04, 2007 21:07 | #25 Hogloff wrote in post #4066320 To me, it is more the principle of the matter. I bought it new so I expect it clean. Maybe another car analogy: Would you mind buying a new car with a scratch on it? After all, you will get more scratches on it anyway. A scratch, no. I can't repair that myself. This doesn't apply. Would you reject a new car because the windows are dirty? My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Troopa Member 133 posts Joined Dec 2006 More info | Oct 04, 2007 21:11 | #26 Yup
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DDan Goldmember 1,725 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Oceanside, Calif. More info | Oct 04, 2007 21:14 | #27 Troopa wrote in post #4066335 DDan, If its dust after the fact then i have no trouble with your statement If theres oil there though.... Then the heck with it. Canon should have taken this into consideration in the designing stages and eliminated the problem to start with and not released the product before hand. you cant say its a problem they would not of known about. It wouldnt be a Big problem cleaning the sensor if Canon readily accepted that this happens and supplied a cleaning kit and full set of instruction on how to clean a sensor. But we all know that Canon wont do this. They have to put lubricant on the mechanical bits in the camera. When you use the camera some of it is going to become dislodged and end up on the sensor. This is not a design issue. They could run each camera through a break in period in the factory and then clean the sensor. This will add to the manufacturing/retail cost. I prefer to pay a lower price and handle the break in and associated cleaning myself. My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DDan Goldmember 1,725 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Oceanside, Calif. More info | Oct 04, 2007 21:20 | #28 Troopa wrote in post #4066389 Yup espeacialy after paying an extra 1500 for underbody spray and all the extras i just got suckered into getting that i really neither wanted or needed I find that a little ridiculous. Yeah I can ask them to clean the windows and it is a small thing for them to do and they will comply. When it rains tomorrow and the windows need to be cleaned again, then what? What does any of this have to do with undercoating? My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Troopa Member 133 posts Joined Dec 2006 More info | Oct 04, 2007 21:21 | #29 Theres nothing wrong with your thinking i believe Dan.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Oct 04, 2007 21:28 | #30 Yup! It's the gift that keeps on giving. Thanks Canon!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2665 guests, 154 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||