Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 04 Oct 2007 (Thursday) 21:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Just upgraded to L

 
JSRunning
Member
Avatar
64 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Oct 04, 2007 21:01 |  #1

I am a believer.

The difference in sharpness is absolutely incredible between my old lenses (17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS; 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS) and my new L glass (24-70mm f/2.8 L; 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS + 1.4x Extender). I went out on my first expedition with them today to see what they could do. I hit up a big train yard, which produced several good subjects. I couldn't get over how these lenses are!

#1

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Byte size: ZERO


#2
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Byte size: ZERO


#3
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Byte size: ZERO


#4
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Byte size: ZERO


#5
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Byte size: ZERO


#6
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Byte size: ZERO


#7
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Byte size: ZERO


#8
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Byte size: ZERO

5D & 400D
EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM :: EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM + 1.4x TC :: EF 16-35mm f/2.8L mkII USM :: EF 50mm f/1.4 USM :: EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
Jeremy Running Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ForumForker
Senior Member
690 posts
Joined May 2006
     
Oct 04, 2007 21:22 |  #2

Congratulations on your new lens. Great pics all.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jj_photography
Senior Member
Avatar
997 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
Oct 04, 2007 21:37 |  #3

Very Nice Pictures. That is how I am planning my set up too were on the same side. One Quick question why do you need the 1.4x extender?

Cheers


My Website (external link)
BLOG (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JKD91980
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
     
Oct 04, 2007 21:43 as a reply to  @ jj_photography's post |  #4

Nice photos....congrats on the upgrade


....Fight On.....
1DIII, 40D, 5DII, 16-35 F2.8L, 24-70 F2.8L, 135 F2L, 70-200 F2.8L.......

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JSRunning
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
64 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Oct 04, 2007 21:53 |  #5

jj_photography wrote in post #4066553 (external link)
One Quick question why do you need the 1.4x extender?

Well, since I was replacing a lens with a 300mm long end, I wanted to give myself the option with the 1.4x attached to the 70-200 f/2.8. Even when it's attached, it's still a stop faster than my old 70-300 f/4-5.6.


5D & 400D
EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM :: EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM + 1.4x TC :: EF 16-35mm f/2.8L mkII USM :: EF 50mm f/1.4 USM :: EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
Jeremy Running Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bailly ­ Photography
Member
162 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Albany, NY
     
Oct 04, 2007 21:59 |  #6

Grats on the lens, it is also my fav. piece of glass.


Canon EOS 400D, 30D w/ BG-E2
Canon [EF 24-70L][EF 70-200L 2.8 IS][EF-S 18-55][EF 50 F1.8][EF 28-105II USM][EF 28-135II]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bootsie
"Dang! I am a loser"
Avatar
3,243 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 22
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Utah
     
Oct 05, 2007 00:02 |  #7

Congrats! I have both of your old lenses, I wish I had the money to upgrade, maybe somday.


{Brooke}
Canon 50D Gripped| 85 1.8| 100 2.8 macro| 17-85 IS| 50 1.8| 70-200 F4 L IS!!
---My Gallery--- (external link) ~My Blog~ (external link) **All My Gear**

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Primm
Senior Member
Avatar
787 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: I come from the land Down Under
     
Oct 05, 2007 00:04 |  #8

Welcome to the dark side!


Ruth.
20D
+ 400mm f/5.6 L + 300mm f/4 L IS + 70-200 f/4 L + 17-40mm f/4 L + 50mm 1.8
Click Here and Join the POTN flickr Group Today! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tsaraleksi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,653 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA
     
Oct 05, 2007 01:55 |  #9

Those are both wonderful lenses, you'll enjoy every minute of using them :).


--Alex Editorial Portfolio (external link)
|| Elan 7ne+BG ||5D mk. II ||1D mk. II N || EF 17-40 F4L ||EF 24-70 F2.8L||EF 35 1.4L || EF 85 1.2L ||EF 70-200 2.8L|| EF 300 4L IS[on loan]| |Speedlite 580EX || Nikon Coolscan IV ED||

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ItsMike
Goldmember
Avatar
2,185 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Greenlawn NY
     
Oct 05, 2007 02:02 |  #10

Great Train Shots!!!!


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raymate
Goldmember
1,736 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 40
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto. CA - Bedford. UK
     
Oct 05, 2007 02:29 |  #11

Great pics . congrats . got my eye on a 24-70 also.... :)


Canon: EOS 5DmkII • 50D • 40D • 350D • 100 f2.8L IS Macro • 70-200 f4L • 24-105 f4L IS • 17-40 f4L • 50 f1.4 • 60 f2.8 Macro • 85 f1.8 • 430EX • 580EX II • ST-E2
Sigma: 10-20 f4-5.6 EX DC HSM • 30 f1.4 EX DC HSM • 17-50 f2.8 EX • 24-70 f2.8 EX DG MACRO
Apple: CS3, Aperture & iPhoto. Various Manfrotto, Portaflash, Battery Grips, SanDisk & Lowepro

alamy: my stock photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sukha_Singh
Member
32 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Birmingham - UK
     
Oct 05, 2007 04:12 |  #12

I got the L fever last week when i got my first L! More or less every pic I took with it was worth keeping. The sharpness and colour is amazing, and the speed of focusing is blinding. All i gotta do now is hide my credit card so i dont end up spending all my wages lol.


400D / BG-E3 Grip / Kit Lens / 50 1.8 / 520EX II / 24-70 2.8L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ G
I feel thoroughly satisfied
Avatar
12,255 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Australia.
     
Oct 05, 2007 04:46 |  #13

Very nice stuff... I quite like #7, very cute :)


Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios​.com.au (external link) Reviews & Hotlinks: Domke F-3x - Pelican 1510/1514 (external link) & 1610/1614 (external link) - DIY Variable Length OC-E3 - Crumpler 6 Million Dollar Home (external link) - FA-100 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jman13
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,567 posts
Likes: 164
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Columbus, OH
     
Oct 05, 2007 05:27 |  #14

Nice shots! After a while you just get used to the exceptional image quality. ;) One thing to realize, though, for your wallet's sake: There are a lot of lenses out there that have L-class image quality, but aren't Ls, and are a lot cheaper, so don't always feel that it has to be L to have that look to it. (Case in point...my Tamron 17-50 is incredible, and in direct comparisons, it's sharper than the 17-40L...it doesn't have the L's build or USM, but optically, it's better.) Also, my Sigma 105mm macro is as sharp as any lens in my kit, and has outstanding bokeh. Not quite as good in color rendition and contrast as my 135L, but then again, there are hardly any lenses in existence that have better IQ than the 135L.


Jordan Steele - http://www.jsteelephot​os.com (external link) | https://www.admiringli​ght.com (external link)
---------------
Canon EOS R5 | R6 | TTArtisan 11mm Fisheye | Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 | RF 24-105mm f/4L IS | Tamron 35mm f/1.4 | RF 35mm f/1.8 | RF 50mm f/1.8 | RF 85mm f/2 | RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | Sigma 135mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdharris
Member
Avatar
181 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2007
Location: near Nashville, TN
     
Oct 05, 2007 08:18 |  #15

I recieved my first L (70-200) last week and I am quite impressed with the IQ compared to my old lenses. I do have one question, I am looking for a good walk around lens and was thinking I wanted to get something with a wide angle (like a 16-35, 17-40, etc), but I have always been drawn to the 24-70. Do you feel you are getting all the shots you could want, or do you feel as if is lacking because it could be wider?

BTW, great shots! I too like #7 :)


Canon 5D Mk II | 40D | 35L | 50L | 85 1.8 | 135L | Lowepro Off Trail 2 | Canon 1EG | Shootsac

http://jdharrisphotogr​aphy.wordpress.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,033 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Just upgraded to L
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1150 guests, 181 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.