Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 05 Oct 2007 (Friday) 20:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Looking for a compact camera for quality pictures

 
elarwill
Hatchling
Avatar
3 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Oct 05, 2007 20:00 |  #1

I have been shopping around for a compact digital for quite awhile now but haven't actually found anyone that knows anything about cameras. They know about the camera they are selling but when I ask them about image quality they have absolutely nothing to say other than a repeat of its megapixels and the features. So besides the fact I want to invest in a really good camera without the equipment luggage. I would prefer really sharp and detailed photos without the major loss of color. I am a real newbie when it comes to photography but I want a camera that takes really good pictures and I'm willing to pay for something that will last me. Any suggestions would be great. I was concidering the Canon 850 Is but I have seen some sample images and they do not seem as clear as previous images.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AutoXer
Member
167 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Maryland
     
Oct 05, 2007 21:33 |  #2

I had a Canon A700 for a "knock-around camera" with which I was very pleased with the image quality (once I turned the in-camera sharpening down to its lowest setting - otherwise it tended to over-sharpen images that I made 8x10's from, although the more usual 4x6's were incredible). Unfortunately my wife has absconded with it, she loves it! My Dad is 74, he bought one after seeing the results from mine and also loves it (he can see what he's doing thanks to the big LCD screen). No, it doesn't match the images that come from my Canon 20D DSLR, but for a tiny camera that can be carried anywhere I find it hard to beat (get the Canon case that's made for it - for $10 it makes for a tiny package that leaves no excuse for not taking it along everywhere). Canon put a very fine lens on that camera and I got some nice 8x10's from it, my favorite being one of the Space Shuttle on the launch pad in Florida that show more detail than a point-& -shoot has any right to deliver. The newer A710, which adds image stabilization, would be even better.

jZ


"High Key" is NOT overexposed, and "Low Key" is NOT underexposed.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snatiep
Senior Member
Avatar
540 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
     
Oct 06, 2007 08:28 |  #3

I recommend the Canon S3 IS. It is a wonderful camera with great zoom and is easy to carry around. The image stabilization works great, and the image quality is awesome!


Nate
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Olegis
Goldmember
Avatar
2,073 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Israel
     
Oct 06, 2007 11:47 |  #4

The A6x0 series cameras are excellent, I myself have and use the A630, it's a great little camera which produces excellent results. It also has rotating LCD screen, x4 optical zoom and full manual control settings. Highly recommended :)
P.S. There was an upgrade to the A6x0 series, A650 IS which added extra zoom and image stabilizer - may be worth a look.


Best wishes,
Oleg.

www.Olegis.com (external link)
My equipment list
'I take orders from no one except the photographers' – Harry S Truman

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alex_H
Senior Member
Avatar
402 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Gaylord, MI
     
Oct 06, 2007 13:16 |  #5

Olegis wrote in post #4075943 (external link)
The A6x0 series cameras are excellent, I myself have and use the A630, it's a great little camera which produces excellent results. It also has rotating LCD screen, x4 optical zoom and full manual control settings. Highly recommended :)
P.S. There was an upgrade to the A6x0 series, A650 IS which added extra zoom and image stabilizer - may be worth a look.

I second that. I have an a640 and it works great. :)


Camera: Canon a640
Lenses: Tokina 3x telephoto and .5 wide angle
My Photobucket Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
darosk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,806 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
     
Oct 06, 2007 14:31 |  #6

Alex_H wrote in post #4076260 (external link)
I second that. I have an a640 and it works great. :)

I third that. I have an a640 and it's excellent!


Tumblr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Youtube (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elarwill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Avatar
3 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Oct 06, 2007 19:46 |  #7

I will definitely check out the A series then. Anyone know if the A650 IS is good. From the reviews and by looking at the specs it looks like a really promising camera for such a little package.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Olegis
Goldmember
Avatar
2,073 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Israel
     
Oct 07, 2007 02:33 as a reply to  @ elarwill's post |  #8

Since the A630/640 (and A610/620 before that) were all excellent cameras, there is no reason to believe that the newer model would not be good. They always seem to improve things in newer models, like operation speed, image quality with lower noise, better LCD displays, more features etc.

The main disadvantages of the A6x0 series (in my opinion) are -
1. Size and bulk (cannot really carry them in your pocket).
2. Lack of "normal" RAW support (RAW support is possible only with some kind of a special hacked firmware). This is more like a nitpicking because JPEG files are very good with this camera.


Best wishes,
Oleg.

www.Olegis.com (external link)
My equipment list
'I take orders from no one except the photographers' – Harry S Truman

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Johnboy
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Oct 09, 2007 18:38 |  #9

IMO, you should save money and get an A640 instead of an A650. The differences between the two are minimal. 2 megapixels? Insignificant! Here's an interesting article exploding the megapixel myth: http://www.kenrockwell​.com/tech/mpmyth.htm (external link) (By the way it's an interesting, informative site.)

The A650 does have slightly greater optical zoom capability -- 6X as opposed to 4X with the A640 -- which is kind of nice... but worth the extra cost? You're call.

Anyway I love my A640, and now that it's an "old" model the price is dropping. I recommend it highly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Oct 10, 2007 09:25 |  #10

Well, the 650 also has the DiGiC III processor, I agree about the 12 vs. 10 MP; in fact, if it weren't for the megapixel "arms race", they shoulda stopped at about 8 MP in the line (and put some of that effort into wider angle zoom lenses).


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
_aravena
isn't this answer a stickie yet?
Avatar
12,458 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Back in the 757
     
Oct 10, 2007 14:19 |  #11

Fuji for low light. Fuji has awesome ISO levels and make nice cameras for a decent price unlike Canon. I won't buy a canon P&S save the nicer G and S series but that's a diff story for those.


Last Shot Photography
My Site (external link) ~ Gear List ~ Bag Reviews

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boubou
Member
Avatar
226 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: On a boat
     
Oct 19, 2007 08:55 |  #12

I was looking for a good quality pocket camera, but I can't find any. All of them have noise at 400 Iso, and sometimes even at 200. I don't want that!!!! Can you tell me about noise and the A serie, because I think it's my next option.... Are they much biger than Ixus serie?


Canon 40D, Grip BG-E2N, Canon EF 17-55 IS 2.8, Canon 70-200 IS 2.8 L, Extender 1.4, Canon 100-400 L, Canon macro 100mm 2.8 IS L, Gitzo 1541T, Markins M10, B+W and Hoya filters, Kata 3N1 30, Phottix C8 wireless remote, Fujifilm F31, Mac Book Pro
In learning process....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Oct 19, 2007 11:23 |  #13

The sensors are about the same size, and that's what makes the difference WRT noise. So don't expect a real improvement in noise levels.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boubou
Member
Avatar
226 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: On a boat
     
Oct 22, 2007 22:29 |  #14

So, what can I buy!!! I spent hours and hours on internet, and no result for a compact camera good in low light condition and indoor pictures. I checked Fuji, the F31 will be perfect but out of stock, end of production. And the F40 and F50 don't have a very good reviews.


Canon 40D, Grip BG-E2N, Canon EF 17-55 IS 2.8, Canon 70-200 IS 2.8 L, Extender 1.4, Canon 100-400 L, Canon macro 100mm 2.8 IS L, Gitzo 1541T, Markins M10, B+W and Hoya filters, Kata 3N1 30, Phottix C8 wireless remote, Fujifilm F31, Mac Book Pro
In learning process....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elarwill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Avatar
3 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Feb 18, 2008 23:28 |  #15

I finally bought an A650 IS today and I'm already loving it. It's so easy to use yet I still have quite a fair amount of control on my settings. Loving the rotating display and the image quality is really great for such a small compact camera. Thoughly please with it so far and I'm sure it continue to give me excellent photos to come. One question though it seems as though I can only zoom in so close to an object before it gets blurry. I changed the settings around but I can't seem to get it to focus. Any suggestions? I would really like to take come close up pictures of flowers and such in the spring. Although it looks as though I may need to buy another lens for it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,549 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Looking for a compact camera for quality pictures
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2562 guests, 97 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.