Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 05 Oct 2007 (Friday) 23:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Portrait lenses

 
JohnAng
Member
65 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Australia
     
Oct 05, 2007 23:48 |  #1

I have been thinking of converting a spare room in the house into a studio for portrait work and was thinking of purchasing 3 lenses

50mm 1.4
85mm 1.8
135L 2

i already have the 24-70L 2.8 and the 70-200L 2.8 IS and was wondering will getting the primes give me better results then the lenses i already have.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,568 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Oct 06, 2007 00:35 |  #2

IMO...for studio type work, your 24-70 should meet pretty much all of your needs. Keep in mind your space constraints....the 85 and 135 will require some working distance that you may not have. With the zoom, you'll be able to obtain different effects simply by zooming to your desired FL. The main reason for the primes IMO is there superior low light performance which isn't usually a factor in a studio environment.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnAng
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
65 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Australia
     
Oct 06, 2007 00:39 as a reply to  @ jra's post |  #3

thanks for the reply jra, so i would be better off putting the extra money toward better quality lights and some nice backdrops then.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jarrad
Senior Member
Avatar
801 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: B.C., Canada
     
Oct 06, 2007 01:25 |  #4

JohnAng wrote in post #4074117 (external link)
so i would be better off putting the extra money toward better quality lights and some nice backdrops then.

Correct


.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scot079
Goldmember
Avatar
3,839 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: Maryland USA
     
Oct 06, 2007 01:33 |  #5

agreed, you've got some nice glass there. No need to buy more...unless you can afford L primes (85L)


- Tim
www.timadkinsphoto.com (external link)
GEARandFEEDBACK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnAng
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
65 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Australia
     
Oct 06, 2007 02:15 |  #6

thanks all.
time to start converting the room then


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dragos ­ Jianu
Goldmember
1,768 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2005
     
Oct 06, 2007 06:47 |  #7

JohnAng wrote in post #4074117 (external link)
so i would be better off putting the extra money toward better quality lights and some nice backdrops then.

Correct. Tough i would still get the 50mm f/1.4. It still beats the 24-70 in terms of IQ and it will offer you a much shallower DoF for creative purposes such as full body shot's/nudes where you want part of the body fading away.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 06, 2007 07:23 |  #8

JohnAng wrote in post #4073911 (external link)
I have been thinking of converting a spare room in the house into a studio for portrait work and was thinking of purchasing 3 lenses

50mm 1.4
85mm 1.8
135L 2

i already have the 24-70L 2.8 and the 70-200L 2.8 IS and was wondering will getting the primes give me better results then the lenses i already have.

When doing portraits in the studio, you will want to have the subject at least six feet or so in front of the background. You will also want the camera at least six feet or so in front of the subject. You will find that (using and APS-C camera) the 50mm focal length would normally work pretty well for "conventional" portraits with these distances. If you stretched to the 85mm focal length you would be limited to a head-n-shoulders framing at these distances. If you had a much bigger studio than the average "spare room", you might be able to use the longer focal lengths.

Keeping the distances between subject/background and camera/subject are very important. The subject/background distance will allow you to blur the background a bit so it's not so "busy" in the image. The camera/subject distance is even more important to get good perspective (relationship of foreground/background subject element sizes - consider noses vs. ears, etc.) in your images that will please the subjects.

I would suggest that you mock up the studio space before going full bore and see what focal length(s) work for you. There are many things that can be done to make a smaller space work for you as a studio. If you run into space problems, bring that up here and you will get a lot of ideas to work with.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnAng
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
65 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Australia
     
Oct 06, 2007 08:38 |  #9

well i have 3 options

spare bedroom which is 4 mtrs x 3.4 mtrs or turn the garage into a studio which is 7mts x 6.5mtrs, or the library which is 5mtrs x 4mtrs

Not sure which room i would use yet. the spare bedroom seems to be the logical choice here though as i'm not sure the wife will be pleased with me taking over the library. The garage wil cost abit as i would then want to carpet it and add heating and cooling to it


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,440 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Portrait lenses
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1705 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.