With noise reduction on the longest I get burst wise is 9 images before it slows, with it off I went as high as 61 and just decided to stop because it could have kept going.
Sauk Goldmember  4,149 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Sandy, UT More info | Oct 07, 2007 16:17 | #1 With noise reduction on the longest I get burst wise is 9 images before it slows, with it off I went as high as 61 and just decided to stop because it could have kept going.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop  69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Oct 07, 2007 17:10 | #2 JPEG or RAW? Remember also that Noise Reduction essentially takes a second, blank, exposure to establish the noise levels of your sensor. If you're shooting bursts, it needs to work with the raw sensor data, so it's saving more information in the buffer. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I was shooting jpeg. I figured that just wanted to see if others were getting the same number. My CF card is x133
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me  34,092 posts Likes: 48 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Oct 07, 2007 17:26 | #4 I thought noise reduction was only for long exposures, having no effect on bursts due to faster shutter speeds being used & NR not being applied. Did they change that with the 40D? Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
well they have two different noise reductions, high iso and long exposure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,092 posts Likes: 48 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Oct 07, 2007 17:31 | #6 Oh ok thanks for that information. Needless to say I don't own the 40D so I had no idea. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fz_za Member 219 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Johannesburg, South Africa More info | Oct 07, 2007 19:47 | #7 AthleticsPhotog, I get about the same number as you do with ISO Noise Reduction on. I guess, as Jon says, it just takes longer to complete the noise reduction process immediately after your shot. Makes sense, then, that this feature is turned off by default on the 40D so you can enjoy the full 6.5fps for a good 60-odd images 40D, 17-55mm f/2.8 IS, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 500D Close-up Lens, Speedlite 430EX with Demb Flash Diffuser Pro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dmitrim Senior Member  More info | Oct 07, 2007 20:27 | #8 Haven't tried it yet, Is it better than Noise ninja?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cathpah Goldmember  4,259 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maine. More info | Oct 07, 2007 20:58 | #9 dmitrim wrote in post #4083931  Haven't tried it yet, Is it better than Noise ninja? in camera noise reduction better than noise ninja? Not in a million years. Architecture
LOG IN TO REPLY |
You see some help using it, but to be honest a program on your cpu is always going to be better then your camera at reducing noise.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Oct 07, 2007 21:14 | #11 It's not so much better or worse as different. It's able to work with the original Bayer-masked pixels, so should theoretically do better. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dmitrim Senior Member More info | Oct 08, 2007 02:05 | #12 Cathpah wrote in post #4084081 in camera noise reduction better than noise ninja? Not in a million years. I thought so. The question is,why is it really there. I mean, 40D is not marketed to complete newbies. It's more for pro/semi-pro photographers. Why would I use this feature over Noise Ninja or similar Noise reduction software??
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Super-Nicko Goldmember  1,652 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Perth, Western Australia More info | Oct 08, 2007 02:28 | #13 agreed dmitrim... i dont see much difference in the shot and if its that bad then your going to take it to NNinja anyways, and for its effect on your speed... i guess it doesnt hurt to have it there as an option though... and not everyone shoots fast all the time... although even when im shooting one shot (95% of the time) i do not enable in cam NR. My gallery - just posted some of my top shots
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermeto Cream of the Crop  6,674 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Oct 08, 2007 02:37 | #14  Permanent bandmitrim wrote in post #4085506 I thought so. The question is,why is it really there. I mean, 40D is not marketed to complete newbies. It's more for pro/semi-pro photographers. Why would I use this feature over Noise Ninja or similar Noise reduction software?? In camera noise reduction is used when photographer, amateur or pro, doesn’t matter, shoots .JPGs and wants to skip in-computer image processing all together. What we see depends mainly on what we look for.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tzalman Fatal attraction.  13,497 posts Likes: 213 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel More info | Oct 08, 2007 03:33 | #15 BTW, as far as I can see the high ISO NR is applied only to jpgs. On RAWs I can't see any difference with it or without it. Elie / אלי
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2801 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
