Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 07 Oct 2007 (Sunday) 21:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Maybe I got it all wrong...

 
morlia
Senior Member
Avatar
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Southern AlbertaCanada
     
Oct 07, 2007 21:49 |  #1

I went to my last wedding of the season and there are few things that I have noticed and just wanted to check with my fellow POTN members to see what they have to say.
I have learned so much in the forum, but it seems that alot of the wedding photographers that I watched work this year don't use the techniques that we see here.

1. I have noticed that at the outdoor weddings none of the photographers that I saw used flash outdoors. So I was wondering how common that is. I always use it especially when we have a really blue sky. Aren't they going to wind up with blown out skies?

2. The indoor weddings that we went to the photographers seemed to use direct bare external flash, no bracket and ddn't bounce it at all. In particular I am thinking about the reception last night that had fantastic low white ceilings. Aren't they going to end up with that yucky harsh shadow behind their subjects?

I ask these questions because I am wondering if I a missing some piece of the puzzle.


not a lot of gear, but I have endless amounts of energy!

http://www.madchenstud​ios.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,091 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Dec 2005
     
Oct 07, 2007 21:51 |  #2

1. I use flash outdoors most, but not all, of the time.

2. Depends on how high the ceiling is. Sometimes the ceiling is too high and the flash doesn't have enough oomph to push the light that far. Yes they'll get side shadow if there is something behind them for the shadow to hit.

3. Not all photographers have a clue. :D


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viet
Goldmember
1,019 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Oct 08, 2007 03:15 |  #3

morlia wrote in post #4084375 (external link)
...snip..
2. The indoor weddings that we went to the photographers seemed to use direct bare external flash, no bracket and ddn't bounce it at all. In particular I am thinking about the reception last night that had fantastic low white ceilings. Aren't they going to end up with that yucky harsh shadow behind their subjects?

I ask these questions because I am wondering if I a missing some piece of the puzzle.

When you said bare external, did you mean an on board flash such as the 580ex? or a light on a stick with bare-bulb like the quantum?

With the Quantum bare-bulb, it's actually very nice sometime. No comments if it was on-board flash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morlia
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Southern AlbertaCanada
     
Oct 08, 2007 09:11 |  #4

viet wrote in post #4085674 (external link)
When you said bare external, did you mean an on board flash such as the 580ex? or a light on a stick with bare-bulb like the quantum?

With the Quantum bare-bulb, it's actually very nice sometime. No comments if it was on-board flash.

it was onboard external....not bare bulb.


not a lot of gear, but I have endless amounts of energy!

http://www.madchenstud​ios.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcap
MR. PP
Avatar
7,364 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Niagara, Ontario
     
Oct 08, 2007 09:27 |  #5

I use my flash 99% of the time. Even if I have a great shaded spot outdoors, I'll use it for a little bit of pop.

Indoors, I don't like using direct flash, but sometimes I'll use direct off-camera flash. The harsh transition between highlights and shadows can sometimes be pleasing, for example, during the 1st dance.


Bryan
Bryan Caporicci's Personal Blog (external link)
Niagara Falls, Ontario Wedding and Portrait Photographer - Bryan Caporicci Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morlia
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Southern AlbertaCanada
     
Oct 08, 2007 09:31 |  #6

bcap wrote in post #4086821 (external link)
I use my flash 99% of the time. Even if I have a great shaded spot outdoors, I'll use it for a little bit of pop.

Indoors, I don't like using direct flash, but sometimes I'll use direct off-camera flash. The harsh transition between highlights and shadows can sometimes be pleasing, for example, during the 1st dance.

So maybe I am unnderstanding...thank​s for the comment


not a lot of gear, but I have endless amounts of energy!

http://www.madchenstud​ios.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcap
MR. PP
Avatar
7,364 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Niagara, Ontario
     
Oct 08, 2007 09:34 |  #7

morlia wrote in post #4086840 (external link)
So maybe I am unnderstanding...thank​s for the comment

I think you need to find what works for you.

For example, when I 2nd shoot with Jeff (member Toogy), we have very different shooting styles. I flash a lot and do alot with off-camera flash, where as he likes to use natural light more than I do, yet our images are equally as good, even though we're using two opposite techniques.

So find what you like to do, find the look you like, what you are comfortable with, and work with that :)


Bryan
Bryan Caporicci's Personal Blog (external link)
Niagara Falls, Ontario Wedding and Portrait Photographer - Bryan Caporicci Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
song4themoon
Goldmember
Avatar
3,039 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
     
Oct 08, 2007 09:58 |  #8

A lot of times outdoors I dont use flash. I do test shots in advance to see what works better and go from there. It really all depends on the particular situation.

Indoors I bounce most of the time but it doesnt always work well... again I test it out and go by what works best in the particular situation


www.forever-yesterday.com (external link)

Gear: 2 Canon 1Ds Mark II, 2 Canon EOS 20D , 580EX flash, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS USM, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 24-70L 2.8, CanonEF 100mm 2.8 USM, Canon EF 85mm 1.8, Canon EF 50mm 1.8, Sigma 20mm f1.8, Peleng Fisheye, 3 AB 800 w/ Pocket Wizzards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Megapixle
Senior Member
Avatar
601 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Oct 08, 2007 10:03 |  #9

morila I think you have a pretty good handle on it. As cdifoto said, not all photographers have a clue. (I'm still working on it myself, lol) I had a conversation with one "wedding photographer" last week who said that photographers who use the flash when it's sunny outside should "get off their ego trip." Okay sir, have a nice day...

~mp


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcap
MR. PP
Avatar
7,364 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Niagara, Ontario
     
Oct 08, 2007 10:05 |  #10

Megapixle wrote in post #4086970 (external link)
morila I think you have a pretty good handle on it. As cdifoto said, not all photographers have a clue. (I'm still working on it myself, lol) I had a conversation with one "wedding photographer" last week who said that photographers who use the flash when it's sunny outside should "get off their ego trip." Okay sir, have a nice day...

~mp

I had some "professional photographer" say that I should get a flash bracket before anything else (this was back when I had my Sigma 24-70 and Sigma 70-200 and Rebel XT, lol)


Bryan
Bryan Caporicci's Personal Blog (external link)
Niagara Falls, Ontario Wedding and Portrait Photographer - Bryan Caporicci Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stathunter
"I am no one really"
Avatar
5,659 posts
Likes: 60
Joined Aug 2006
Location: California & Michigan
     
Oct 08, 2007 12:35 |  #11

cdifoto wrote in post #4084385 (external link)
.......

3. Not all photographers have a clue. :D

Sooooo true. Look at most wedding photos and they are simply icky...........


Scott
"Do or do not, there is no try"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Accountcloseddh6YFD
Senior Member
374 posts
Joined Mar 2006
     
Oct 08, 2007 13:26 |  #12
bannedPermanently

morlia wrote in post #4084375 (external link)
1. I have noticed that at the outdoor weddings none of the photographers that I saw used flash outdoors. So I was wondering how common that is. I always use it especially when we have a really blue sky. Aren't they going to wind up with blown out skies?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Not my photo, but this was shot with a 1DsMII, Canon 15mm Fisheye at 1/3200 @ 2.8, 200 ISO. No flash. No blowouts.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
restech
Senior Member
Avatar
257 posts
Joined Jul 2005
     
Oct 08, 2007 13:59 as a reply to  @ Accountcloseddh6YFD's post |  #13

Hi Nic,
On that photo, are you sure there is no other lightning ?
It's really wonderful pic.


Seattle wedding photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joshbehan
Senior Member
Avatar
799 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
     
Oct 08, 2007 14:11 |  #14

there HAS to be some other light source, or gigantic reflector in front of that couple.


Website (external link)
Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zorz
Senior Member
Avatar
349 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: NYC
     
Oct 08, 2007 14:17 |  #15

restech wrote in post #4088288 (external link)
Hi Nic,
On that photo, are you sure there is no other lightning ?
It's really wonderful pic.

I would think quite an extensive PP-ing was applied to compensate for lack of fill-in light in backlight conditions. You can't go against the nature.


Ed, Zorz Studios (external link)
My introduction to POTN
1D Mk II N, 5D, 85mm L, 24-70mm L, 70-200mm L IS, 15mm fisheye, 50mm Mk I, Hensel Integra Pro monolights w/radio (3), 580EX II and 430X, Sekonic L-758DR, PocketWizards, Manfroto CF tripod, Wacom Intuos 3 6x11, EyeOne Display 2, Canon PIXMA Pro 9000

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,392 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Maybe I got it all wrong...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2028 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.