zorz wrote in post #4088370
I would think quite an extensive PP-ing was applied to compensate for lack of fill-in light in backlight conditions. You can't go against the nature.
I would think quite an extensive PP-ing was applied to compensate for lack of fill-in light in backlight conditions. You can't go against the nature.
That's what I was thinking...but I have changed my mind when proved wrong. lol...I am learning so much reading this banter. It is a gorgeous photo though!
Thanks to everyone who has joined in on this conversation.
