Thanks for this post, i will forward to my wife, maybe i can sleep in the house now. I bought the IS
welcome to the club. You are now a true POTN Wedding Forum member! 
sblais I am silly 3,532 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Ottawa, ON (Canada, eh!) More info | Oct 11, 2007 09:53 | #16 Richtherookie wrote in post #4105437 Thanks for this post, i will forward to my wife, maybe i can sleep in the house now. I bought the IS
Sebastien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrsOpie Goldmember 1,014 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah More info | Oct 11, 2007 10:21 | #17 70-200mm/2.8 and up that ISO!! -OpieFoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightUser Senior Member 286 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info | Permanent banUse 2 cameras..I've never in my life shot on or from the pulpit..that ruins the video being shot and other images maybe from the audience..the closest I shoot from is the 3rd row back with a 28-105 zoom....then once the ceremony starts I go to the back with my 75-300 on a monopod..usually not enough room for a tripod during the weddings I shoot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Richtherookie Goldmember 1,034 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Cedar Springs, Michigan More info | Oct 15, 2007 09:19 | #19 I loved my 70-200mm f2.8 IS this weekend, worked great for everything but some of the shots were in smaller rooms as it was tough getting far enough away to get the whole subject in the picture. But after that it was great. Broke my tripod as the bride walked down the isle, so IS safed me. So now i'll go buy a GOOD tripod. Canon 40D, Rebel XT, Kit lens, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, 50mm F/1.8II, 28-135mm 3.5-5.6 IS USM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dlphotography Member 179 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Oct 15, 2007 17:29 | #20 |
fiveFPS Goldmember 1,180 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2007 More info | Oct 16, 2007 04:17 | #21 I would like to save up to the 2.8 is.. i have a f4 non-is now and it's great outdoors but sometimes hard indoors and low light Canon XTI | Canon 430ex | Crumpler 7MDH | 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bnlearle Goldmember 1,901 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego More info | Oct 16, 2007 09:14 | #22 70-200 2.8 IS without question. I've shot almost entire weddings with this while having a 24-70 loaded on another body on my shoulder and it never seeing use. Don't get me wrong, the 24-70 is a great lens. I just couldn't shoot a whole wedding with it at all. I totally could with the 70-200. twitter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2422 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||