Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 09 Oct 2007 (Tuesday) 07:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

40d problems - no idea what though.

 
twofruitz
Senior Member
Avatar
840 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: AUSTRALIA
     
Oct 09, 2007 07:25 |  #1

Hello from Australia, no one in this country seems to know the answer to my problems (even Canon), and from a fair bit of reading on this site, there seem to be alot of knowledgeable people around. Sorry for this being my first post :)

Alrighty, the other night i decided to take a long exposure at night and found that my camera (or maybe something im doing) is causing a "christmas tree" effect on the images i take.

I have tried each and every mode (M, SP, AP), ISO changing, white balance settings, however when the shutter is opened more then 1 second, this happens. The darker the image is, the less i get the effect. So bright images come out as below.

The spots are in the same spot each time.

100% crops of two different photos, i have 100 with the same effect.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PAFC2004
Goldmember
Avatar
1,084 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Oct 09, 2007 07:27 |  #2

Seems to me as if you have a sensor issue. I see the second was one a 30 second exposure on ISO 1600. Some strange spots can be expected with such an exposure, but I wouldn't expect the ones (or the amount) shown in those photos. I would send it back for a check up.


Canon 5D MKii |Canon 350D | EF 17-40L | EF 70-200 2.8L | 580EX II | 430EX | EF 1.4x T/C II | EF 50 1.8II | Q6600 + 8800 Ultra

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S2000
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Oct 09, 2007 07:45 |  #3

HOT PIXELS due to high ISO and exposure length


....
Shawn's Photo Journal - Updated 09.09.10 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PAFC2004
Goldmember
Avatar
1,084 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Oct 09, 2007 07:48 |  #4

S2000 wrote in post #4093028 (external link)
HOT PIXELS due to high ISO and exposure length


Does that look like a normal amount to you though?


Canon 5D MKii |Canon 350D | EF 17-40L | EF 70-200 2.8L | 580EX II | 430EX | EF 1.4x T/C II | EF 50 1.8II | Q6600 + 8800 Ultra

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermeto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,674 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Oct 09, 2007 07:52 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

No, it looks like the good candidate for replacement!


What we see depends mainly on what we look for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S2000
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Oct 09, 2007 07:56 |  #6

PAFC2004 wrote in post #4093043 (external link)
Does that look like a normal amount to you though?

Don't know if it's normal, but it's what it is.

I would try ISO 200 for an extend exposure and see what I get though.


....
Shawn's Photo Journal - Updated 09.09.10 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PAFC2004
Goldmember
Avatar
1,084 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Oct 09, 2007 07:57 |  #7

S2000 wrote in post #4093076 (external link)
Don't know if it's normal, but it's what it is.

I would try ISO 200 for an extend exposure and see what I get though.

The OP has a camera that is useless at ISO 1600 though.


Canon 5D MKii |Canon 350D | EF 17-40L | EF 70-200 2.8L | 580EX II | 430EX | EF 1.4x T/C II | EF 50 1.8II | Q6600 + 8800 Ultra

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bacchanal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,284 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
     
Oct 09, 2007 08:01 as a reply to  @ PAFC2004's post |  #8

you can test it with this just for fun.

http://www.photo-freeware.net/deadpixel​test.php (external link)

I think it's pretty reasonable to expect some hot pixels at high iso for long exposures (how many, I don't know). That is one of the reasons people that do this kind of shooting stack exposures.


Drew A. | gear | photosexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
twofruitz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
840 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: AUSTRALIA
     
Oct 09, 2007 08:20 |  #9

at ISO100 the results are 99% the same.

I ran that test last night, and it said it found alot...


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S2000
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Oct 09, 2007 08:33 |  #10

twofruitz wrote in post #4093188 (external link)
at ISO100 the results are 99% the same.

I ran that test last night, and it said it found alot...

Now I would say take it back.


....
Shawn's Photo Journal - Updated 09.09.10 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Box ­ Brownie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,198 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Surrey
     
Oct 09, 2007 08:58 |  #11

Been a while since I did long exposures but I am sure I recall a setting on my 350D - no doubt somewhere on all of the EOS dSLRs - for making "dark frame" subtraction' exposure this is intended to remove such hot pixels and reduce the noise found in long exposures ~ or am I totally off the wall with this understanding :)


That was a great meal ~ you must have a good set of pans :p
Images for a photographic memory (external link) | Flickr (external link) | >>>My 500px<<< (external link)
credit line is vanity, payment is sanity

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrkgoo
Goldmember
2,289 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Oct 09, 2007 13:49 |  #12

If they are hot pixels... why do they take up more than one pixel? Are hot pixels often localised like that?

Also, just for my interests sake, do several rounds of 'clean' now using the built in cleaning system (go to the menu). I've heard that it can remap hot pixels, adn was curious to know if it worked.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Oct 09, 2007 14:04 |  #13

Remember - the final JPEG is the result of combining the different colour values of adjoining pixels. The effect of a single hot pixel will "spill over" to adjoining ones. And if it's truly hot, it'll heat up adjoining ones too. Hot/dead pixels are essentially extreme examples of sensor noise. The longer the exposure and the higher the ISO the worse it'll be. ISO 1600 for 30 sec. and you'll have a lot of noise. If it's at all warm to begin with, expect still more.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Oct 09, 2007 14:17 |  #14

PAFC2004 wrote in post #4093081 (external link)
The OP has a camera that is useless at ISO 1600 though.

No, but he might have a camera that isn't great for 30 second exposures at 1600...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrkgoo
Goldmember
2,289 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Oct 09, 2007 14:54 |  #15

Jon wrote in post #4094994 (external link)
Remember - the final JPEG is the result of combining the different colour values of adjoining pixels. The effect of a single hot pixel will "spill over" to adjoining ones. And if it's truly hot, it'll heat up adjoining ones too. Hot/dead pixels are essentially extreme examples of sensor noise. The longer the exposure and the higher the ISO the worse it'll be. ISO 1600 for 30 sec. and you'll have a lot of noise. If it's at all warm to begin with, expect still more.

I see. Thank-you.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,529 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
40d problems - no idea what though.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2844 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.