Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 09 Oct 2007 (Tuesday) 19:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Very Technical Question Regarding Measuring Light

 
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Oct 09, 2007 19:50 |  #1

If a light meter is held up directly to a source, and the reading is 85 candelas/square meter........ then what would this number be equal to in foot candles? we are talking luminance units being converted to illuminance..... Any opinions?


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ C
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Now: N 39°36' 8.2" W 104°53' 58"; prev N 43°4' 33" W 88°13' 23"; home N 34°7' 0" W 118°16' 18"
     
Oct 09, 2007 20:02 |  #2

Would this be a straight conversion from metric to standard measurements?

Or am I way off base...again...

Now I'm curious too since I just purchased a light meter.


Gear: Kodak Brownie and homemade pin-hole cameras. Burlap sack for a bag.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Oct 09, 2007 20:05 as a reply to  @ Karl C's post |  #3

No idea. I posted this question which was posed by my brother-in-law. I don't even understand the question.:o:o


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hard12find
Senior Member
Avatar
597 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
     
Oct 09, 2007 20:08 |  #4

Tell your brother to not drink the bong water ;)


20D, 10D, Fuji S-20, Mamiya C220 medium format, Sekonic L-508 meter, 2 alien bee 800's, AB remotes, Sigma 500 HS flash, 70-200 F2.8 L, Sigma 24-70 F2.8 EX DG, lots of glass, lots of stuff,8-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ibdb
TD's worst nightmare!
Avatar
6,484 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Puyallup -- Don't worry. Nobody else can pronounce it either.
     
Oct 09, 2007 20:12 as a reply to  @ hard12find's post |  #5

I'm pretty sure you're speaking a foreign lanuage, but there are a sizeable number of conversions here:

http://www.unitconvers​ion.org/ (external link)

You might be able to find something useful.


-David
"David raises a good point. . ." -- CDS
"Once again, David Raises a good point! :lol:" The Wise and Powerful CDS
Gear List | Proof I Use The Gear In My Gear List (not necessarily proof I use it well) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 09, 2007 20:14 |  #6

I think you will find the answer in this article (external link). I am not about to try to paraphrase it, though :p.

I even found a conversion calculator (external link) for you.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DrPablo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Oct 09, 2007 20:23 |  #7

cd/m^2 is a pretty standard way of measuring light -- as opposed to stops which aren't actually a measure of light at all (or EV, which isn't either). Haven't heard of foot candles though.


Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
Film gear: Agfa 8x10, Cambo 4x5, Noblex 150, Hasselblad 500 C/M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ C
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Now: N 39°36' 8.2" W 104°53' 58"; prev N 43°4' 33" W 88°13' 23"; home N 34°7' 0" W 118°16' 18"
     
Oct 09, 2007 20:44 |  #8

DrPablo wrote in post #4096907 (external link)
cd/m^2 is a pretty standard way of measuring light -- as opposed to stops which aren't actually a measure of light at all (or EV, which isn't either). Haven't heard of foot candles though.

Ansel discusses foot candles in his book, "The Negative", page 11 under Incident Light.


Gear: Kodak Brownie and homemade pin-hole cameras. Burlap sack for a bag.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ C
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Now: N 39°36' 8.2" W 104°53' 58"; prev N 43°4' 33" W 88°13' 23"; home N 34°7' 0" W 118°16' 18"
     
Oct 09, 2007 20:50 |  #9

SkipD wrote in post #4096851 (external link)
I think you will find the answer in this article (external link). I am not about to try to paraphrase it, though :p.

I even found a conversion calculator (external link) for you.

Thanks for the links. My brain now needs a drink or two or ten to recover from reading that.


Gear: Kodak Brownie and homemade pin-hole cameras. Burlap sack for a bag.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Oct 09, 2007 20:54 |  #10

isn't foot candle the amount of light produce by one candle at a distance of one foot away???




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 09, 2007 21:06 |  #11

lostdoggy wrote in post #4097086 (external link)
isn't foot candle the amount of light produce by one candle at a distance of one foot away???

Yup.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Oct 09, 2007 21:08 |  #12

So one is about luminence and the other is about radiance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DrPablo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Oct 09, 2007 21:17 |  #13

Karl C wrote in post #4097037 (external link)
Ansel discusses foot candles in his book, "The Negative", page 11 under Incident Light.

Thanks, Karl,

I think he discusses cd/m^2 as well -- I'm pretty sure it's from that very book that I learned about it. Been a while, though.


Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
Film gear: Agfa 8x10, Cambo 4x5, Noblex 150, Hasselblad 500 C/M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ C
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Now: N 39°36' 8.2" W 104°53' 58"; prev N 43°4' 33" W 88°13' 23"; home N 34°7' 0" W 118°16' 18"
     
Oct 09, 2007 21:37 |  #14

DrPablo wrote in post #4097178 (external link)
Thanks, Karl,

I think he discusses cd/m^2 as well -- I'm pretty sure it's from that very book that I learned about it. Been a while, though.

I'm sure he does too. My pea-brain is still spinning from what I've read so far and I'm only on page 40-something.


Gear: Kodak Brownie and homemade pin-hole cameras. Burlap sack for a bag.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Primm
Senior Member
Avatar
787 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: I come from the land Down Under
     
Oct 09, 2007 21:42 |  #15

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2343/1528380920_4082cafbfe.jpg

I love Convert it (external link)

Ruth.
20D
+ 400mm f/5.6 L + 300mm f/4 L IS + 70-200 f/4 L + 17-40mm f/4 L + 50mm 1.8
Click Here and Join the POTN flickr Group Today! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,260 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Very Technical Question Regarding Measuring Light
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1541 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.