mmahoney wrote in post #4117799
Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps .. why not add perhaps they are closely related to Santa and are giving away work in a big red bag?
500 photos for $600 is more likely to be crap than any of the "perhaps" you offered.
Re-read the original question .. he surveyed the competition so this is not some isolated dilettante with a day job or some pro-bono bozo with a hard-on for bridesmaids charging the $600 .. it's the wedding shooters in his area.
Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps .. why not add perhaps they are closely related to Santa and are giving away work in a big red bag?
500 photos for $600 is more likely to be crap than any of the "perhaps" you offered.
Re-read the original question .. he surveyed the competition so this is not some isolated dilettante with a day job or some pro-bono bozo with a hard-on for bridesmaids charging the $600 .. it's the wedding shooters in his area.
You do have a way with words if not logic... "crap" and "hard-on"?? All with no basis in fact?
BTW I just Googled the OP's location for wedding photographers in his area and looked at the first ten sites I found...
Five offered no pricing on their site.
The others offered the following packages:
a. $2K to $4.9K
b. $2K to $4.95K
c. $1.8K and up
d. $1.895K to $4.395K
e. $3K to $15K
Certainly a living wage for a good photographer with a worthy portfolio I would think assuming he/she can book enough weddings over the course of the year.
