Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 03 Aug 2004 (Tuesday) 15:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Learning photography. What camera?

 
artwell
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Jul 2004
     
Aug 03, 2004 15:45 |  #1

I bought a Casio Exilim EX-Z3 awhile ago, as a point and shoot type camera that I could easily carry around. So far I love it and have managed to take some decent pictures with it. Now I'm starting to learn photograhy and the general concepts and techniques surrounding it. I'm looking into a new camera that will help me w/learning photography skills, and I've come across great reviews on the Canon Digital Rebel and the Canon Rebel Ti. Should I get another digital camera or learn with film? What's the best way to really learn photography? I've heard many people saying digital provides instant gratification and allows you to edit whatever you need to edit right after you take the picture, which I understand. Are there advantages to buying a 35mm SLR camera right now, besides being a lot cheaper?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Penguin_101_1
Goldmember
1,259 posts
Joined Feb 2004
     
Aug 03, 2004 16:12 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

I would say learn with digital. It is cheaper in the long run and you get to see the pic then.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveG
Goldmember
2,040 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
     
Aug 03, 2004 18:57 |  #3

artwell wrote:
I bought a Casio Exilim EX-Z3 awhile ago, as a point and shoot type camera that I could easily carry around. So far I love it and have managed to take some decent pictures with it. Now I'm starting to learn photograhy and the general concepts and techniques surrounding it. I'm looking into a new camera that will help me w/learning photography skills, and I've come across great reviews on the Canon Digital Rebel and the Canon Rebel Ti. Should I get another digital camera or learn with film? What's the best way to really learn photography? I've heard many people saying digital provides instant gratification and allows you to edit whatever you need to edit right after you take the picture, which I understand. Are there advantages to buying a 35mm SLR camera right now, besides being a lot cheaper?

In a lot of ways I think that a completely manual camera is the best way to start. This means that you have to set the ISO, the aperture and the shutterspeed all by yourself, and in the process of understanding all of this stuff, you will take command of the camera.

But it's not very practical to do this anymore. Don't mess with a cheaper film SLR. Just bite the price bullet and have free film to play with. I'd get a 10D, promise myself that it would stay on M for the forseeable future, and then I'd shoot until my finger bled.

You just have to be so careful that you don't get caught up in the autofocus, zooming, program modes, and all the other bells and whistles that simplify the process so much that it's easier to let the camera take care of things for you. And for a long time the camera probably WILL make better decisions than you. But once again, it you ever want to be a real photographer you must control the camera and not the other way around.


"There's never time to do it right. But there's always time to do it over."
Canon 5D, 50D; 16-35 f2.8L, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 f1.4, 100 f2.8 Macro, 70-200 f2.8L, 300mm f2.8L IS.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ijohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,646 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Whiteriver, AZ
     
Aug 04, 2004 00:20 |  #4

It was my 30 year-old Minolta SLR that made me fall in love with Photography, but it ended up being Powershot G2 that helped me get much, much better at it, at least better than people I know anyway. So it is my Digital SLR that has let me be in love with something that I am good at using.

That is the way it went for me. I can't imagine taking the G2 out of the process as I never would have shelled out the clams for DSLR unless I had understood how great digital photography is.

My recommendation is to buy a DSLR and set it to M for about 6 months. Sometimes I do that just out of respect for the old Minolta.


www.trickoflight.net (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/i​tj12345 (external link)
Original 5D still ROCKS!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Aug 04, 2004 07:35 |  #5

An argument can be made that the only real way to learn photography is to use a manual mode film SLR. It seems that some beginner photography classes require this.

On the other hand, with modern D-SLR camera advancing the way they are, there seems to be less need to learn all of the manual stuff. I mean, it is nice to know the manual stuff, but the modern stuff inside the camera can often calculate exposures faster and better than the human. Note that I stated often. It can't do it better 100% of the time. Often the human eyeball-to-brain link can see something that the camera can't see. In those cases, it is great to have a camera that gets it 98% right, and then let the human control take over to get the last 2% perfect.

I just finished some travel where I shot about 180 frames digitally, and another 120 frames on film, so I go both ways.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cordell
Member
178 posts
Joined Oct 2003
     
Aug 04, 2004 10:10 |  #6

Consider this; with film you have to write in a notebook your settings for each shot. With digital you have all the information there as you look at the shot. Digital gives you the opportunity to see what adjustments you need for a given situation. This is where you can learn what you want to know. Of course you can do the same with film but it takes a lot longer considering you have to go through the film development stage.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Aug 04, 2004 12:48 |  #7

Cordell wrote:
Consider this; with film you have to write in a notebook your settings for each shot. With digital you have all the information there as you look at the shot. ...

That is an excellent practice, and some camera classes require this of the student.

I was having a discussion last week with a new Nikon film shooter, and I asked about her notebook. She showed me her first entries for the first roll of film. I studied those for a second, and then I asked her what they mean. She didn't know.

Beginner Canon digital shooters might want to go back and look at some of their image files, and study the EXIF data with each image. Compare the settings from two similar shots, and try to understand why things are the way they are. Looking at how the image appears is important, but also look at the settings to figure out how you got to that point.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blinking8s
Goldmember
Avatar
1,618 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: w.kentucky
     
Aug 04, 2004 20:33 |  #8

the one thing I HATE about film...is carrying that darn notebook around...


blinking8s.com (external link) | pixelpost photoblog application (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Penguin_101_1
Goldmember
1,259 posts
Joined Feb 2004
     
Aug 04, 2004 21:24 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

blinking8s wrote:
the one thing I HATE about film...is carrying that darn notebook around...

I just use my pocket pc.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadenza
Senior Member
440 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay
     
Aug 04, 2004 21:53 |  #10

If cost is a consideration, as it often is with students,
get a G3/G5 level camera. For less than $400-500;
these cameras are a lot more than mere snapshooters,
a lot of professionals use these convenient units as
backups, and you can do serious work with them.

They provide full manual control, adjustments and
such that will teach you all the important concepts.
Even their limitations are in a way a good thing,
because they discipline you as an artist, and prepare
you to fully appreciate the capabilities of an SLR
down the road.

Furthermore, the argument against investing in an
expensive SLR system is that, by the time you've
mastered the main photographic concepts, there
probably will be a better/cheaper/more advanced
SLR on the market. You will also know yourself
better as a photographer, and hence make a better
educated decision as to what SLR system you want
to invest yourself into.

Just look at this guy's G5 portfolio:
http://www.chromasia.c​om/iblog/archive.php (external link)
he totally kicks ass of 99% of all of us DSLR shooters
out there. Also, note that Forum godfather Pekka started out
with a humble G1.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfect_10
Goldmember
Avatar
1,998 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2004
Location: An Ex Brit living in Alberta, Canada
     
Aug 04, 2004 22:15 |  #11

I first dabbled in SLR photography in the mid '70's with my trusty Canon AE-1 (which I still have). Used A-1's and T70/90's up until just over a year ago when I went EOS (still using film media). I've also been shooting digital for the last four years, but mainly as a point and shoot hobby .. my serious stuff was still shot on film. I've just moved over to serious digital and ordered my 10D .. so let the real fun begin.

Bottom line .. it's nice to learn the basics .. manual exposures, manual focus, etc .. but digital can teach you faster, as you see results in real time, and you may learn from your mistakes quicker. As DaveG stated .. get the 10D and use it in manual mode .. I don't think you'll regret it, as you'll grow into it.


My Gear List  :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Aug 05, 2004 10:40 |  #12

IMO 300D is the way to go. It doesn't take that long to learn the relationship between the aperture and shutter speed :wink:, a bit more time on how they are related to image quality, bokeh, dof... etc

When you do learn that with a G1/3 or other digicam, you're gonna want interchangeable lenses, fast apertures and the coolness of belonging to EOS club. :twisted:

So save your money and get an SLR from the start. Cause in all probability you're gonna end up like me switching from S1 to the Rebel and losing a bit of money...


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Penguin_101_1
Goldmember
1,259 posts
Joined Feb 2004
     
Aug 05, 2004 11:24 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

DocFrankenstein wrote:
IMO 300D is the way to go. It doesn't take that long to learn the relationship between the aperture and shutter speed :wink:, a bit more time on how they are related to image quality, bokeh, dof... etc

When you do learn that with a G1/3 or other digicam, you're gonna want interchangeable lenses, fast apertures and the coolness of belonging to EOS club. :twisted:

So save your money and get an SLR from the start. Cause in all probability you're gonna end up like me switching from S1 to the Rebel and losing a bit of money...

Do you mean SLR or DSLR?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yallcome
Member
205 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Suffolk, UK
     
Aug 05, 2004 12:48 |  #14

which camera?

Experience speaking here. Don't climb your way to the top. Go ahead and spring for the Digi Rebel or a 10d or equivalent. That way you don't waste money all along the way upgrading when you learn the limits of your gear.

You can still learn all the manual stuff on them if you force yourself to get out of the auto modes.

Pick up a good book at a used bookstore or on Alibris about real photography and USE it.

John Hedgecoe's old book from the mid-70s comes to mind, although I can't remember the title. He also has some others (lots) out that are well worth your time.

Then learn what it means to process your images. It's much nicer in the digital world now without all the chemicals and mess, but you still have to learn and do the processing digitally to be really happy with your work. I think any photographer always dreams of having a darkroom at home. Now you can have it -- it still takes work, but all the the crap -- practical and psychological (if you're married or share a house with someone) -- surrounding a traditional one is gone.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Aug 05, 2004 18:53 |  #15

Penguin_101_1 wrote:
Do you mean SLR or DSLR?

dSLR is a subset of SLR. I don't know his budget so I can't advise him on what to get specifically.

Ideally it would be a sSLR, but he may not have the money. What I meant is the exact advice from yallcome in the above post ^^^^ Don't climb your way to the top.

The other thing with film is that you just can't learn as fast. No way. Even with super cheap development, you're not gonna take 50 pictures of the same subject just to test the DOF and different exposure values. No way.

Film forces you just to shoot in the field, instead of actually learning. So my take on it is this (from best way to worst):

1) Ideally, you have a good budget and just go for rebel/10D
Pros: Great cameras, free shutter clicks and high learning curve.
Cons: The costs involved.

2) You don't have the $$$ but willing to wait
You save up for a few months and get 10D/Rebel
Pros: You won't waste money in "the long run", but
Cons: you won't be able to learn at all right now

3) You don't enough for 10D and no patience.
Go with a digital fully manual non slr.
Pros: Lots of images, steep learning curve, point and shoots don't have mechanical shutters.
Cons: You lose money in the long run

4) Absollutely no money and no patience
Get an SLR.
Pros: Cheap. Still takes pictures.
Cons: You won't learn much. Not if you spend a grand or two in film processing. If you can't afford a rebel, you won't be able to afford to learn with your film camera. :twisted: See the above.

Cheers

BTW: If you still want to get a film camera, make sure it's either a Canon EOS or Nikon... something that's compatible with D70. This way you'll use the kit lens on your rebel.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,646 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Learning photography. What camera?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1237 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.