Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 15 Oct 2007 (Monday) 15:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

24-70 f/2.8 or 24-105 f/4 IS

 
dsc_1972
Senior Member
Avatar
458 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Edinburgh, UK
     
Oct 15, 2007 15:57 |  #1

I already have a 24-70 f/2.8 but am thinking ahead to a wedding I have agreed to shoot.

What would you use? Should I even consider sacrificing f/2.8 for the sake of IS?


Dave
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Borderfox
Goldmember
Avatar
1,367 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Dunshaughlin, Ireland
     
Oct 15, 2007 15:59 |  #2

I wouldnt, f2.8 is always f2.8. IS only corrects camera shake


Click Here and Join the POTN flickr Group Today! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsc_1972
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
458 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Edinburgh, UK
     
Oct 15, 2007 16:05 as a reply to  @ Borderfox's post |  #3

That's how I think about it, but I can't help worrying about it (the shakes!).

I just need the lighting to be right. Or bump the ISO into the stratosphere.

Thanks mate. I'm full of questions at the minute and I still have 14 months to go before the wedding I'm shooting.


Dave
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Borderfox
Goldmember
Avatar
1,367 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Dunshaughlin, Ireland
     
Oct 15, 2007 16:12 as a reply to  @ dsc_1972's post |  #4

Always go one step more in ISO than you are comfortable with as a sharp picture sells whereas a soft one goes in the bin. Ask away, I have one in two weeks time in between event photography


Click Here and Join the POTN flickr Group Today! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bnlearle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,901 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego
     
Oct 15, 2007 16:13 |  #5

Some might, but I never would. The 24-70 is key to my wedding photography.


twitter (external link) // facebook (external link)
Website (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photographer blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rodolfocorona
Member
Avatar
92 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Mexico D.F.
     
Oct 15, 2007 16:15 as a reply to  @ dsc_1972's post |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

I have 24-70 2.8 I really like it.


Luis Rodolfo Corona | inquadratura.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsc_1972
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
458 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Edinburgh, UK
     
Oct 15, 2007 16:27 |  #7

borderfox - yep, you are right mate. in fact I am recovering, from ISO-phobia!

bnearle - god to hear you like this lens too! do you mostly use it on the 1D?

rodolfocorona - glad you like it oo - i take it you mostly use it on the 1Ds?


Dave
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 15, 2007 16:27 |  #8

Have a read of the FAQ and do a little search, this topic comes up most weeks, usually more than once. I use a 17-55 F2.8 IS but that won't work on 5D or 1 series.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsc_1972
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
458 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Edinburgh, UK
     
Oct 15, 2007 16:36 |  #9

tim wrote in post #4129337 (external link)
Have a read of the FAQ and do a little search, this topic comes up most weeks, usually more than once. I use a 17-55 F2.8 IS but that won't work on 5D or 1 series.

Sorry :oops: :)
I appreciate how boring the same old questions are to regulars! (I work in IT Support.)

It's a great FAQ ,Tim. I've been there many times.... I have just ordered a couple of books recommended there - and read Al Jacobs 'Bridezilla' - which I really enjoyed!

I know that EF-S lenses don't work on '5' and '1' series bodies ;)

Although you seem to have all missed the announcement of the new EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS.

....... yeah right.... dream on everyone ;)


Dave
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bnlearle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,901 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego
     
Oct 15, 2007 17:10 |  #10

I switch it up a fair amount. It's equally good on my MKIIN as it is on my 40D. Definitely go with the 2.8 ;)


twitter (external link) // facebook (external link)
Website (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photographer blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsc_1972
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
458 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Edinburgh, UK
     
Oct 15, 2007 17:47 |  #11

I must I must increase my ISO!
I am trying...
I shot this at ISO3200 in ambient light indoors, 30D, 70mm, f/2.8, 1/80, the night before last, while watching Scream 2. didn't have a bride handy... but I ran it through neatimage in CS2 (default settings) and it looks OK to me.

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2215/1563200828_a8488a3052_b.jpg

Dave
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 15, 2007 18:04 |  #12

dsc_1972 wrote in post #4129389 (external link)
Although you seem to have all missed the announcement of the new EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS.

That'd be great for 5D/1 series people, too long for 1.6X crop bodies :p


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsc_1972
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
458 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Edinburgh, UK
     
Oct 15, 2007 18:09 |  #13

tim wrote in post #4129907 (external link)
That'd be great for 5D/1 series people, too long for 1.6X crop bodies :p


you know, I think I'd cope... even before I get my 5D next year! :D

OK I have prolonged this thread too much already and I know the answer - stick to the 24-70! Slap me on the wrists!


Dave
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jgogums
Senior Member
729 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Oct 15, 2007 18:39 |  #14

3200 ISO on my 30D would make me scream too.
That shot looks pretty decent cleaned up though. While I love my 24-70 I wouldn't trade it for a f/4 that has IS. If IS is calling your name then look at the 17-55 2.8 IS. By many accounts a great lens. I believe Tim and many others on the wedding forum use it and love it.
If you know the venue I'd practice there if at all possible. Ideally with a person or two in white and black. Practice in challenging low light (worst case scenario) with no flash. Get a feel for how the lens may hunt in low light and at what point going with higher ISO has diminishing returns.
With 14 months to go I'd get real intimate with your 24-70 and really understand its strengths and weaknesses on your 30D. Who knows you may find yourself looking at a new body that handles higher ISO's better than your 30D.

EDIT: Oops, I see you are looking at a 5D...scratch the 17-55 recommendation...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsc_1972
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
458 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Edinburgh, UK
     
Oct 15, 2007 18:56 |  #15

@ Greg
thanks mate - I like the idea of checking out the venue... it's in Ireland and I'm in Scotland, but I'll search for photos on the net. Definitely need to know the layout - ceiling height, colour, etc, protocol for photos during ceremony and all that.

I was at a catholic wedding in sicily last month - surprised to see full flash allowed throughout (bare bulb stands used by the pro).... but who can say what those mad Irish folk will say!

god yeah 17-55 IS would be a godsend---- if it wasnt EF-S!

P.S. This is the bride and her sister. This shot was heavily photohopped to remove a bright white projection screen behind them.

IMAGE: http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1412/1464692558_601894a3aa.jpg

Dave
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,600 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
24-70 f/2.8 or 24-105 f/4 IS
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2422 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.