diversq wrote:
Anyhow what I need to know is, what out of this equipment should be priority (besides the d30) and what can take a back seat. I have never been to an island and don't know what to expect. Pekka what have you learned since you bought the camera. Should I invest in a Digital wallet and single 128mb card. We are going out there for 14 days so I am going to be taking lots of shots. Is the ( 28-135 IS ) lens what you expected it to be. I plan on doing alot of portraits and landscape and wonder how the d30 will hold up with those.
First of all congratulations for the "getting married" part!
About storage:
I have no experience on anything else than Microdrives and CF cards. I have two 1 GB Microdrives and they have worked without problems in D30.
About lenses:
To me the 28-135 IS produces technically good photos and IS is sometimes helpful. I have not shot much with it, only when I need wide angle. In my view it's too "ordinary" lens: there's the personal touch missing from its photos. What I mean is that as:
I like 50/1.4 for it's smooth bokeh, excellent sharpness, bright correct colors, light weight and unobtrusiveness. It's somehow a lens which makes photos look very artistic and 3-D. Excellent for portraits.
I like 70-200/2.8L for it's superfast silent focus, feel of it, for it produces almost the same feel to the photo as 50/1.4, has exellent technical quality in all aspects, let's you get nearer to any event by just looking so pro (and actually gets you more assignments because they see that gear)! Photos from it are always impressive. Problem with this lens is that you need 1/250 when handholding at 200mm and it's quite heavy. I got a Manfrotto Carbon monopod for it.
I've also had Canon 17-35/2.8L for a week and although I did like it I think I'll need still more wide end. Some say this lens is the most usable one and yes it can be very good choice if you have only one lens with you.
Character of the lens and image the lens produces is why my next lenses will likely to be 85/1.8 (to complement 50/1.4 in concert halls) and Sigma 14mm (for landscapes, interiors and perspective effect shots).
The most important factor for me in a lens is its sensitivity to light. Even if you don't always use f1.4 in your 50mm you get a brighter viewfinder, focussing is faster and you have a possibility to not use the flash and get shots which you would not otherwise get at all.
There's a world of difference how viewfinder look through 70-200/2.8 or 28-135IS and the minimum f5.6 when you zoom 28-135IS full is not very usable in many situations.
So the bottom line to your question is: a lens is sort of a personal choice (the essence of SLR system) so to choose one you'd have to have a view of how you'd like to see the world and what, when and where (and from what distance) you'd like to shoot. Sounds pompous but that's the only logical answer. Of course everyone will do bad choices from time to time because you can never be sure until you use those tubes for a while.
Technical stuff and some reviews are here: http://www.techphoto.org …ks.epl?webobjectoid=21191
Here's one 50/1.4 shot from two days ago:
| MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script |
Here's a panorama (3 horizontal shots) with 70-200/2.8L:
http://studio-on-the.net …ll/music/panoCRW_7958.jpg