Sorry but in my monitor the second set looks much crisper. Could be the dell laptop I am on.
stathunter "I am no one really" 5,659 posts Likes: 60 Joined Aug 2006 Location: California & Michigan More info | Oct 18, 2007 14:01 | #16 Sorry but in my monitor the second set looks much crisper. Could be the dell laptop I am on. Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamJT Senior Member 330 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Ohio More info | Oct 18, 2007 15:29 | #17 I had to agree with stathunter. My first impression when looking through the pics was that the 5d was a little sharper. But I think that the OP explained already that the shutter speeds may have been a little low given the increased focal length. Adam
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 18, 2007 17:05 | #18 AdamJT wrote in post #4148914 I had to agree with stathunter. My first impression when looking through the pics was that the 5d was a little sharper. But I think that the OP explained already that the shutter speeds may have been a little low given the increased focal length. At least I think that is what it was.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I managed to process some more 40D shots. I didn't have too many keepers due to user error...doh! 40D + 100-400L 135mm ISO800 40D + 100-400L 400mm ISO400
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Last few...hope it's OK... OK, last one...this one with 5D + 135L f2 1/200 ISO200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oh....can't forget the King of the Jungle, can I?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | HI Nick, Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnnyG Worthless twinkle toes fairy 3,719 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Houston, Texas More info | Oct 18, 2007 17:30 | #23 nicksan wrote in post #4149493 I managed to process some more 40D shots. I didn't have too many keepers due to user error...doh! I started to use faster and faster shutter speed (by boosting ISO) because I was no longer trusting myself with the 100-400L on the 40D. I really need to learn how to use the lens on a consistent manner! ![]() You guys be the judge! 40D, 100-400L, 210mm ISO 800 ![]() 40D + 100-400L 135mm ISO800 ![]() 40D + 100-400L 400mm ISO400 ![]() These are excellent, thanks for posting them! Canon EOS 5D Mark II, 100-400IS L, 24-105 L[COLOR=black][FONT="] IS, 50mm f/1.4, Canon 430EX/580EX II, Kenko 1.5X, Epson R1900, Manfrotto 679B Monopod, 3021BPRO tripod, 808RC4 Head, 486RC2 Ballhead
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 18, 2007 19:37 | #24 TMR Design wrote in post #4149540 HI Nick, Looks like you're getting the hang of it just fine. Very nice, sharp images. ![]() He he...thanks...but I think with the 100-400L it's more like spray and pray for me at the moment!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 18, 2007 19:40 | #25 JohnnyG wrote in post #4149591 These are excellent, thanks for posting them! From what I've seen, here and other places, the 40D clearly outshines the 5D! The IQ is much better, colors more vivid, just overall a better photo! Really?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | Oct 18, 2007 19:45 | #26 nicksan wrote in post #4150414 He he...thanks...but I think with the 100-400L it's more like spray and pray for me at the moment! Easy to look good when you put up pics here...but I've got a trash bin load worth of bad ones! ![]() LOLOL I hear you Nick. Then let's just say you're off to a good start. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2743 guests, 154 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||