Holding the camera above my head... I call this one a lucky accident (funny though, they're happening more often these days...). Keep or throw?
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Oct 17, 2007 04:38 | #1 Holding the camera above my head... I call this one a lucky accident (funny though, they're happening more often these days...). Keep or throw? Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RobKirkwood Goldmember 1,124 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Nottingham, UK More info | Oct 17, 2007 04:46 | #2 I'd keep it, I like it a lot - and some of our own favourite shots have been lucky accidents (not sure what that says about our actual ability though).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
csm328 Goldmember 1,834 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Canberra, Australia More info | Oct 17, 2007 04:47 | #3 If you're going to cut him off, why not split him directly in half? One of those 'artsy' type pics. And he must be the tallest man on the planet (or you're the shortest) if you had the cam above your head Wayne
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim THREAD STARTER Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Oct 17, 2007 05:07 | #4 RobKirkwood wrote in post #4139030 I'd keep it, I like it a lot - and some of our own favourite shots have been lucky accidents (not sure what that says about our actual ability though). I dunno Rob, but the more I learn, the luckier I get csm328 wrote in post #4139033 If you're going to cut him off, why not split him directly in half? One of those 'artsy' type pics. And he must be the tallest man on the planet (or you're the shortest) if you had the cam above your head ![]() The camera was above my head to change the background, not because he was tall! I didn't want sky in the photo. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Banbert Goldmember 1,514 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Leamington Spa, UK More info | Oct 17, 2007 05:44 | #5 Permanent banI like it, his eyes are a little bit too close to the edge but I dont think that spoils the image, still a keeper I reckon ... couple and their friends will like it ... MOB, MOG's etc will think it was a mistake Warwickshire Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bcap MR. PP 7,364 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Niagara, Ontario More info | Oct 17, 2007 07:09 | #6 Yup, keep it. I've done this tons of times, do a shot on accident while testing/setting up lighting ratios/etc and I'm like "damn, I like that angle!" lol Bryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
song4themoon Goldmember 3,039 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Maryland More info | Oct 17, 2007 07:17 | #7 I am not crazy about it. To me it shows that it was accidental. I think if his head wasnt cropped off then it might work better. But that's just my taste www.forever-yesterday.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
arch1tect Goldmember 1,541 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: northern nj More info | Oct 17, 2007 07:19 | #8 song4themoon wrote in post #4139381 I am not crazy about it. To me it shows that it was accidental. I think if his head wasnt cropped off then it might work better. But that's just my taste I agree, while I do find the frame to be filled nicely the head thing bothers me. Michael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KathyH " it's a very handsome sheep! " 7,622 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Western USA More info | I like it! It's a keeper by my standards. Kathy H
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tnicol Member 222 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Chicago suburbs More info | Oct 17, 2007 08:14 | #10 I'll take luck over skill any day. I might try cropping up to lose the hand, but am not sure. Tom...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nikonthree Senior Member 316 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Savannah, GA More info | Oct 17, 2007 08:38 | #11 Not sure.. the head being chopped off (especially with the fact you grabbed his full torso and a portion of the legs) and the angle of his body (he seems to be on a slight angle with maybe his left shoulder leaning back a bit too much) kind of bother me. -Rich R.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joshbehan Senior Member 799 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Rhode Island More info | Oct 17, 2007 09:58 | #12 |
stathunter "I am no one really" 5,659 posts Likes: 60 Joined Aug 2006 Location: California & Michigan More info | Oct 17, 2007 10:32 | #13 Tim-- too bad you didn't have one of the bride from the other side ...then you can have a set of them and put them together or have them separate when they are not getting along. Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
notapro Goldmember 2,540 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Southwestern Ontario More info | Oct 17, 2007 10:35 | #14 I kind of like it, too. I would probably keep it as that would probably be one of my better images from the day. I'm sure you have better shots. Amanda
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jamiewexler Goldmember 2,032 posts Likes: 11 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Grafton, MA More info | Oct 17, 2007 10:54 | #15 I kinda like it too, but I think I'd like it more if the lighting was a little less flat... Massachusetts Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1791 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||