Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 17 Oct 2007 (Wednesday) 07:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Two lenses to buy

 
amironsi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,284 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Cairo - Egypt
     
Oct 17, 2007 07:38 |  #1

I bought my camera as a hobby, then i started being addicted to Portrait and wedding photography... so i decided to make my gear bigger by buying 2 lenses for portrait and wedding photography.
those 2 lenses are the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, and the Canon EF 75-300 f/4-5.6. i know they are not so expensive, but buying them in Egypt makes them so so so so expensive.

So i wanted to know are those lenses enough for wedding photography and portrais or not?? and will they be useful in which cases???
i am an starter so i don't know that good yet...
Hope anyone can help.


It's all about WHITE BALANCE.
http://www.amirwilliam​.com (external link)
40D, 350D,BG-E3,EF-S 17-55 f/2.8,EF 70-200 f/4 L,EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6,580EX Speedlite,190XPROB,681​B,322RC2,804RC2,234RC,​5 batteries and 12GB of memory,Lowepro Stealth Reporter 650AW.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ultimate ­ CC
Goldmember
Avatar
1,480 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Oct 17, 2007 07:48 |  #2

for weddings a big one is the 17-55 IS or a cheaper version would be the 3rd party 17-50 2.8s...you are going to have tough time with 50mm being your widest lens...maybe add a 28-105 USM II...


My Gear And For Sale Items
www.danhonovich.com (external link)
www.danhonovich.blogsp​ot.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gheesom
"just stupid enough"
Avatar
1,101 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Runcorn, UK
     
Oct 17, 2007 08:09 |  #3

I agree re the 50mm, its a great lens, I love mine, but its just not wide enough


Gareth
Cheshire Wedding Photographer (external link)
North West Photography Blog (external link)
Cheshire Wedding Photography on Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arch1tect
Goldmember
Avatar
1,541 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: northern nj
     
Oct 17, 2007 08:46 |  #4

the 50 is a great lens for the price but the focusing issues will cause you more heachaches than anything else.


Michael

New Jersey | New York Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amironsi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,284 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Cairo - Egypt
     
Oct 17, 2007 09:11 |  #5

arch1tect wrote in post #4139823 (external link)
the 50 is a great lens for the price but the focusing issues will cause you more heachaches than anything else.



What focusing issue, i know it has autofocus....


It's all about WHITE BALANCE.
http://www.amirwilliam​.com (external link)
40D, 350D,BG-E3,EF-S 17-55 f/2.8,EF 70-200 f/4 L,EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6,580EX Speedlite,190XPROB,681​B,322RC2,804RC2,234RC,​5 batteries and 12GB of memory,Lowepro Stealth Reporter 650AW.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris
Goldmember
Avatar
4,133 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 47
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Algonquin, IL
     
Oct 17, 2007 09:16 |  #6

I believe he is talking about focusing in low light. The lens will hunt back and forth to gain focus and you can miss the shot you wanted while that is happening.
The two premium lenses for your camera are the 17-55 2.8 IS and the 70-200 2.8 IS. However you will have to drop some major bucks to get that combo.


Chris

70D | 24-70 2.8 | 400 5.6 | 580 EXII | 2X Yongnuo 622C |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arch1tect
Goldmember
Avatar
1,541 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: northern nj
     
Oct 17, 2007 09:18 |  #7

amironsi wrote in post #4139963 (external link)
What focusing issue, i know it has autofocus....

It has autofocus that is very rarely accurate especially when it comes to low light and movement.


Michael

New Jersey | New York Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JJacula
Goldmember
1,791 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Oct 17, 2007 11:19 |  #8

The 50mm 1.8 is also very inconsistent ... you can point it exactly where you want it, focus it there, and when you process later, you see the focus has jumped elsewhere when you KNOW you put it in the right spot. I have this lens, but will be upgrading to the 1.4.

The 75-300 is great for outdoor photography - I have this lens and it's my favorite for horse shows - but it's just not made for weddings. I'll be upgrading from this lens to the 70-200 L 2.8 IS USM ASAP.


http://www.jenniferjac​ula.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gheesom
"just stupid enough"
Avatar
1,101 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Runcorn, UK
     
Oct 17, 2007 15:30 |  #9

the focus on mine is pretty good, low light it struggles a little in, but not much, but then I'm quite happy to flick to manual focus.


Gareth
Cheshire Wedding Photographer (external link)
North West Photography Blog (external link)
Cheshire Wedding Photography on Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 17, 2007 20:53 |  #10

Nope, skip them both for professional use. 17-55 F2.8 IS and 70-200 F2.8 IS is what I would recommend.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,570 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Two lenses to buy
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1852 guests, 108 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.