Hey,
This is from a wedding I recently shot as a favor. This shot really popped out at me and I was wondering if you like the PP and the shot.
Please don't hold back in any critique.
computerguru3190 Senior Member 380 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Baton Rouge/New Orleans More info | Oct 17, 2007 23:50 | #1 |
notapro Goldmember 2,540 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Southwestern Ontario More info | Oct 17, 2007 23:53 | #2 I dislike the selective colouring, but otherwise i think it's kind of neat. Is this the groom feeding the bride wedding cake? Amanda
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joshbehan Senior Member 799 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Rhode Island More info | Oct 17, 2007 23:59 | #3 |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Oct 18, 2007 00:10 | #4 Nope. It took me a while to work out what it was, I don't like the expression, and the lighting's funny. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
twofruitz Senior Member 840 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: AUSTRALIA More info | Oct 18, 2007 00:15 | #5 I think this shot would be alot more effective if the lady was in focus rather then the hand. Also, in this situation, more lighting would have been better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
notapro Goldmember 2,540 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Southwestern Ontario More info | joshbehan wrote in post #4144931 i also dislike the selective coloring, it's not his ring finger, so there's no need to hightlight that ring on his right index finger. Ah, I didn't even notice that. in that case, I kinda feel the same as the others. I would have preferred it if she was in focus. Amanda
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Oct 18, 2007 00:53 | #7 joshbehan wrote in post #4144931 i also dislike the selective coloring, it's not his ring finger, so there's no need to hightlight that ring on his right index finger. That's not his index finger...it's not his traditional ring finger though either, unless he's a lefty and this image was mirrored. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scot079 Goldmember 3,839 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2007 Location: Maryland USA More info | Oct 18, 2007 00:54 | #8 IMHO, it would be better if the focus were opposite. I wish the woman's face was in focus! - Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GertS Senior Member 353 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Gone More info | Oct 18, 2007 00:57 | #9 It's taste, but not mine. - left forum in protest -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
restech Senior Member 257 posts Joined Jul 2005 More info | Oct 18, 2007 02:12 | #10 agree with other. Better to focus on an expression rather than on a hand.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
madhatter04 Goldmember 1,930 posts Likes: 52 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Southern California More info | Oct 18, 2007 02:21 | #11 I think her expression looks a bit pained and comatose Designer // Art Director // Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samsen Cream of the Crop 7,468 posts Likes: 239 Joined Apr 2006 Location: LA More info | Oct 18, 2007 02:21 | #12 No no & no. Weak retaliates,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mizuno Goldmember 1,680 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Hobart, Australia More info | Oct 18, 2007 04:58 | #13 Permanent banNot really, no. DAN CRIPPS PHOTOGRAPHY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeesaB "Patience is a what? " 14,682 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: It's just St. Louis now! More info |
bndgrl Member 187 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Roanoke, VA More info | Oct 18, 2007 07:18 | #15 All my eyes see in this picture is a big hairy hand. The selective coloring makes him looking like he's wearing a band-aid or something under the ring. Just doesn't work for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1790 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||