Would a 70-200 be enough for shooting blue angels / thunderbirds at an airshow or would adding a EF 2X II be better?
TXClark Member 152 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Leander, TX More info | Oct 18, 2007 08:23 | #1 Would a 70-200 be enough for shooting blue angels / thunderbirds at an airshow or would adding a EF 2X II be better? Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nikolas Goldmember  1,720 posts Likes: 7 Joined May 2005 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Oct 18, 2007 08:33 | #2 TXClark wrote in post #4146518  Would a 70-200 be enough for shooting blue angels / thunderbirds at an airshow or would adding a EF 2X II be better? a 1.4 would be plenty Canon 5D2 20D & 300D 50mm f1.8 mk 2, 24-105 f4 IS L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
You loose one stop right? The 1.4x does seem to have better feedback vs the 2.0x. Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nikolas Goldmember 1,720 posts Likes: 7 Joined May 2005 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Oct 18, 2007 10:23 | #4 TXClark wrote in post #4146728 You loose one stop right? The 1.4x does seem to have better feedback vs the 2.0x. Yep and virtually no IQ loss. Canon 5D2 20D & 300D 50mm f1.8 mk 2, 24-105 f4 IS L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is NekoZ8 1672 guests, 100 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
