its a hurry-up-and-wait situation....
We all want our cameras to be fixed ASAP but must wait for Canon to announce which ones..

serviceover Senior Member 462 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Germany More info | Oct 21, 2007 06:43 | #736 its a hurry-up-and-wait situation.... Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
racketman Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 21, 2007 07:50 | #737 Anke wrote in post #4160188 I admire your optimism, but as usual we in the UK will just get royally stuffed. ![]() ![]() I don't believe for one minute Canon would only do a US recall, the European market must be just as important to them. Toby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MaDProFF Goldmember 4,369 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: East Sussex, UK More info | Oct 21, 2007 09:39 | #738 racketman wrote in post #4163338 I don't believe for one minute Canon would only do a US recall, the European market must be just as important to them. Agreed Photographic Images on Brett Butler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 21, 2007 09:45 | #739 I did read parts of this. Bottom line, are we still awaiting instructions from Canon? Any firm date as to when we will find out?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MaDProFF Goldmember 4,369 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: East Sussex, UK More info | Oct 21, 2007 10:02 | #740 I Personally think that all Camera's need the modification, and the only ones that may not are new ones that have come off the production with the latest parts fitted, assuming they have now changed their production line, and they should know what ones are by the S/N Photographic Images on Brett Butler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Oct 21, 2007 11:42 | #741 MDJAK wrote in post #4163667 I did read parts of this. Bottom line, are we still awaiting instructions from Canon? Any firm date as to when we will find out? And for those who think it ironic or "funny" that people who have not noticed problems, have their cameras recalled, laugh at me. In the beginning I noticed no problems with my camera, but as I used it more and more under different circumstances, from weddings to portraits to sports, it became apparent to me mine needs fixing too. mark [Nelson muntz voice on] Haaa haaa[/off] GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joegolf68 Goldmember 3,269 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Sacramento CA area More info | Oct 21, 2007 16:23 | #742 Steve Beck wrote in post #4162159 Its gonna be even more funny when they say nothing is wrong with cameras that people say has a problem. I'll take bets that will not happen. It is one thing to have the problem and not notice due top shooting style, it is another for people to test their cameras multiple times and have the exact same problem, that their new M3 doesn't auto focus as well as their IIN. Not likely at all! Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joegolf68 Goldmember 3,269 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Sacramento CA area More info | Oct 21, 2007 16:28 | #743 MDJAK wrote in post #4163667 And for those who think it ironic or "funny" that people who have not noticed problems, have their cameras recalled, laugh at me. In the beginning I noticed no problems with my camera, but as I used it more and more under different circumstances, from weddings to portraits to sports, it became apparent to me mine needs fixing too. mark Not so. I think you missed the finer point here, and that is ONLY those who made "snide" comments like, "Mine is perfect, are you not sure your hands are not steady, or your custom functions are set wrong, or the... well, we don't have a problem so it is just probably YOU not the camera that should be blamed." Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenyc Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 21, 2007 16:31 | #744 CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #4164201 [Nelson muntz voice on] Haaa haaa[/off] The word from Chuck was "approx two weeks" (to paraphrase,) for the info on how to find if your camera may be effected. We have no other more recent info. some seem to think a test will be involved, some assume it will be a mere matter of serial numbers/date codes. I suspect the latter. My suspects are with yours, after all you can't really trust users to do the test properly. Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joegolf68 Goldmember 3,269 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Sacramento CA area More info | Oct 21, 2007 16:33 | #745 Madprof wrote in post #4163719 I Personally think that all Camera's need the modification, and the only ones that may not are new ones that have come off the production with the latest parts fitted, assuming they have now changed their production line, and they should know what ones are by the S/N Anyone who thinks they have not had problems, but their body is not in the range of S/N of bodies that have new kit fitted would be mad not to send in their bodies for the modifications. my own Views of I certainly couldn't/wouldn't try to argue with that logic. I agree. I've thought since the moment the issue came up, if it is a hardware problem, I will send mine in no matter what. Down the road, be assured anyone knowing the camera's history will either: Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenyc Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 21, 2007 16:51 | #746 MDJAK wrote in post #4163667 I did read parts of this. Bottom line, are we still awaiting instructions from Canon? Any firm date as to when we will find out? And for those who think it ironic or "funny" that people who have not noticed problems, have their cameras recalled, laugh at me. In the beginning I noticed no problems with my camera, but as I used it more and more under different circumstances, from weddings to portraits to sports, it became apparent to me mine needs fixing too. mark Mark, just for reference, I thought the initial problems I was having were just due to me, so much so that I kept the camera past the return period before realizing it wasn't me, but a real problem with the camera. Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mdurisseau Member 145 posts Joined Nov 2006 More info | Oct 21, 2007 17:57 | #747 kenyc wrote in post #4165553 Mark, just for reference, I thought the initial problems I was having were just due to me, so much so that I kept the camera past the return period before realizing it wasn't me, but a real problem with the camera. KAC I did the same thing...I had a chance to RMA it through B & H, but I waited too long...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
michael_ Goldmember 3,450 posts Joined May 2006 Location: sydney... More info | Oct 21, 2007 18:36 | #748 kenyc wrote in post #4165553 Mark, just for reference, I thought the initial problems I was having were just due to me, so much so that I kept the camera past the return period before realizing it wasn't me, but a real problem with the camera. KAC that was also my original thinking, after this weekends shooting in 31-40'C temps i dont know if its me or the camera, and now i am paranoid, so bring on the fix already so i can determine if its me who sucks or the body ichael ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Oct 21, 2007 18:44 | #749 Heck I never doubted my own amazing skilzzz.... GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MaDProFF Goldmember 4,369 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: East Sussex, UK More info | Oct 21, 2007 19:47 | #750 I can understand why now people reported a problem more in the very hot weather, the parts in question were probably tightening up, expanding, etc. Photographic Images on Brett Butler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1828 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||