I wonder if there is anything official on any of this by Canon. What if we're all doing it wrong!?
segasaturn Senior Member 849 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii More info | Oct 21, 2007 22:01 | #31 I wonder if there is anything official on any of this by Canon. What if we're all doing it wrong!?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_Cohran Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 21, 2007 22:25 | #32 Like most of the others here, I do agree that changing a lens while the camera is on will not result in damage to the lens or camera, nor does it increase the risk of dust attraction to the sensor. However, there is a caution about changing IS lenses without waiting for the IS to disengage. There were a few threads about this in the forum not too long ago. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ashdavid Osteoglossum bicirrhosum 986 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Japan More info | Oct 21, 2007 22:44 | #33 Mark Kemp wrote in post #4160521 No, Only if you get it squashed between the lens and the body, not if its actually in the camera!! Thats what I did the other day, it also reduces your frames/per/sec rate considerably on a MKIII, not to mention that the cards writting ability is severly compromised. 1Ds MKIII, 5D, 30D, EF 50mm f/1.2L , EF 85mm f/1.2L , EF 24-70mm f/2.8L , EF 80-200mm f2.8L, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS , EF 300mm f/2.8L , EF 400mm f2.8L IS, EF 800mm f5.6L IS EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro , EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro ..... Speedlite 580EX II x 4, Speedlite 430EX x 1, ST-E2 , Remote Switch,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
transcend Goldmember 1,461 posts Joined Oct 2004 Location: Squamish, BC More info | Oct 21, 2007 22:56 | #34 Hermeto wrote in post #4167009 If powered on sensor collects more dust, how come that, according to Canon’s own instructions, sensor cleaning can be performed only with camera powered on?! It'd be hard to get past the mirror assembly and shutter if the camera was not powered on.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermeto Cream of the Crop 6,674 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Oct 21, 2007 23:23 | #35 Permanent bantranscend wrote in post #4167629 It'd be hard to get past the mirror assembly and shutter if the camera was not powered on. ![]() Why? What we see depends mainly on what we look for.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
transcend Goldmember 1,461 posts Joined Oct 2004 Location: Squamish, BC More info | Oct 22, 2007 00:37 | #36 Hermeto wrote in post #4167783 Why? They could be actuated, locked in the open position and after that camera could be powered off. With next power on, everything goes back to default position, ready for shooting – just the same as it is now. Notice you need to have a full battery or AC power to clean your camera. The only way the shutter and mirror can be held open is powered up. If the battery dies and or you unplug it, the mirror comes down and the shutter closes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermeto Cream of the Crop 6,674 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Oct 22, 2007 00:48 | #37 Permanent bantranscend wrote in post #4168121 Notice you need to have a full battery or AC power to clean your camera. The only way the shutter and mirror can be held open is powered up. If the battery dies and or you unplug it, the mirror comes down and the shutter closes. I agree, but that’s how it operates now.. What we see depends mainly on what we look for.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xarqi Cream of the Crop 10,435 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand More info | Oct 22, 2007 00:51 | #38 Hermeto wrote in post #4168156 [...]cleaning the powered on sensor is safe and it does not attract more dust. I may have missed an authoritative post on this, but it was my understanding that although the mirror was raised, and the shutter opened for cleaning, the sensor itself was not energised.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermeto Cream of the Crop 6,674 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Oct 22, 2007 01:00 | #39 Permanent banOf course that sensor is not energized! What we see depends mainly on what we look for.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DDA Formerly foolish member. Waiting for new title. 9,354 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Between a cow, a clock and tons of chocolate... More info | Oct 22, 2007 02:14 | #40 I don't wann hijack the thread, but this question is quite related... DDA - C&C welcomed and encouraged
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ashdavid Osteoglossum bicirrhosum 986 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Japan More info | Oct 22, 2007 02:50 | #41 DDA wrote in post #4168424 I don't wann hijack the thread, but this question is quite related... If I remember well, it's writeen in the manual of my 100-400 that you should always turn the camera off before changing lens as you could damage the IS. Any truth? Experience? As said before in this thread, if the IS is still engaged you may do some damage. 1Ds MKIII, 5D, 30D, EF 50mm f/1.2L , EF 85mm f/1.2L , EF 24-70mm f/2.8L , EF 80-200mm f2.8L, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS , EF 300mm f/2.8L , EF 400mm f2.8L IS, EF 800mm f5.6L IS EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro , EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro ..... Speedlite 580EX II x 4, Speedlite 430EX x 1, ST-E2 , Remote Switch,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ISimonius Weather Sealed Photographer 6,508 posts Gallery: 19 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 49 Joined Feb 2005 Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes More info | Oct 22, 2007 03:23 | #42 Hermeto wrote in post #4167009 If powered on sensor collects more dust, how come that, according to Canon’s own instructions, sensor cleaning can be performed only with camera powered on?! no other way to keep the mirror locked up Veni, Vidi, Snappi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ISimonius Weather Sealed Photographer 6,508 posts Gallery: 19 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 49 Joined Feb 2005 Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes More info | Oct 22, 2007 03:25 | #43 ashdavid wrote in post #4168497 As said before in this thread, if the IS is still engaged you may do some damage. How? Veni, Vidi, Snappi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JBaz Goldmember 1,672 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Apex, NC More info | Oct 22, 2007 09:01 | #44 Yeah, I'm kind of curious of why having the power on with IS when changing lens would do some damage. Camera Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DDA Formerly foolish member. Waiting for new title. 9,354 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Between a cow, a clock and tons of chocolate... More info | Oct 22, 2007 09:07 | #45 I guess it could be damaged if it is still engaged. For that, you would have to be really quick to remove the lens after taking the finger off the shutter... DDA - C&C welcomed and encouraged
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2706 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||