How?
I didnt notice any mention of it in the lens manula - I'll have to go find it now I suppose..
Yes, it's in the IS lens' manuals, but under different headings. In both of mine under Handling Cautions (!).
agedbriar Goldmember 2,657 posts Likes: 399 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Slovenia More info | Oct 22, 2007 09:27 | #46 I Simonius wrote in post #4168608 How? I didnt notice any mention of it in the lens manula - I'll have to go find it now I suppose.. Yes, it's in the IS lens' manuals, but under different headings. In both of mine under Handling Cautions (!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | RX350 wrote in post #4164377 i do this all the time. no problem. what about taking memory out while camera ON , I heard this is bad. ![]() When you open either the card door or the battery compartment door, there's an interlock which turns off the camera. An innovation in the 1D III is that it'll blink an LED at you if you open the card door, but will continue writing to the card. DDA wrote in post #4168424 I don't wann hijack the thread, but this question is quite related... If I remember well, it's writeen in the manual of my 100-400 that you should always turn the camera off before changing lens as you could damage the IS. Any truth? Experience? JBaz wrote in post #4169523 Yeah, I'm kind of curious of why having the power on with IS when changing lens would do some damage. When the IS isn't active, the moving optical group is locked in place; with the IS spun up, it's free to move and could damage something. The IS components take about 30 sec. to spin down after you release the shutter button, so that's considered the safe interval. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DDA Formerly foolish member. Waiting for new title. 9,354 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Between a cow, a clock and tons of chocolate... More info | Oct 22, 2007 12:52 | #48 Thanks Jon for this comprehensive answer! DDA - C&C welcomed and encouraged
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DAMphyne "the more I post, the less accurate..." More info | Oct 22, 2007 13:49 | #49 I think it's prudent to power down any electronic equipment when changing parts. David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Goshawk Senior Member 841 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Tanzania More info | Oct 22, 2007 15:23 | #50 Few years ago of the coast in South Africa I lost all my images on my card while changing lenses. It was a 10D and the lens I removed was a 70-200 2.8L IS. I reviewed the situation several times in my mind and can only conclude that I must have touched the shutter and activated the IS while removing the lens. I had just done a Seal shoot from a boat at a island so were pretty devastated by the loss. Never happened before and never again. Still use the card up to today so no permanent damage to the card. 1D Mk III - 100mm 2.8 Macro - 24-70mm 2.8L - 70-200mm 2.8L IS - 500mm 4.0L IS - 430EX, 580EX II, ST-E2, Stroboframe, Quantum Turbo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pakomo Senior Member 374 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Denmark More info | Oct 22, 2007 15:39 | #51 Hermeto wrote in post #4168184 Of course that sensor is not energized! There’d be plenty of interesting pictures by now, of pack pads moving across the sensor in wet cleaning, or tip of the blower approaching the sensor.. ![]() I think you would have a hard time getting ANYTHING in focus, without a lens attached Patrick Kofod Mogensen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
numbersix fully entitled to be jealous 8,964 posts Likes: 109 Joined May 2007 Location: SF Bay Area More info | Oct 22, 2007 15:42 | #52 pakomo wrote in post #4171735 I think you would have a hard time getting ANYTHING in focus, without a lens attached ![]() Actually, anything on the sensor will be fairly close to in-focus. That's why we clean dust on the sensor. "Be seeing you."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JBaz Goldmember 1,672 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Apex, NC More info | Oct 22, 2007 20:33 | #53 very informative. I will now have to change my habits... either that or just buy several bodies and not switch lens anymore... lol Camera Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarkKemp Goldmember 1,064 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2003 More info | Are we all sure its absolutley safe to press the shutter button when the pwoer is on? or did someone hear a rumour about that too?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Oct 23, 2007 12:19 | #55 Mark Kemp wrote in post #4176727 Are we all sure its absolutley safe to press the shutter button when the pwoer is on? or did someone hear a rumour about that too? It absolutely isn't safe. The only people who've never gotten an OOF, poorly-exposed, or blank picture, and who've never had a shutter failure, lens failure, card failure, flash failure, image banding, front-focusing, back-focusing, severe vignetting, CA, spherical aberration, purple fringing, . . ., are the people who haven't pressed the shutter button with the power on. :{)# Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2724 guests, 145 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||