Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 21 Oct 2007 (Sunday) 13:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Newbie to DSLR: Canon Rebel XT or XTi

 
nirajpatel13
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
Oct 21, 2007 13:41 |  #1

I am graduating from my SD600 to a DSLR for a 4.5 month trip.

since I am a newbie and there is a risk of my camera getting stolen or broken on the long trip would you just opt for the Canon EOS Rebel XT or is the XTi (160$ difference).

I am planning on buying the body only.

thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nwa2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,131 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Manitoba
     
Oct 21, 2007 13:46 |  #2

Go for the xti. I have the Xt it is a fine camera, but from what I have read the xti is an improvement.


Canon 6D; 7D; 40D:
There are many tomorrows', but only one today!!
[SIZE=1][COLOR=Black]http://www.Abercrombie​.me.Uk (external link)
http://imagesix.wordpr​ess.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
     
Oct 21, 2007 13:51 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Purchase the best you can comfortably afford and add decent lenses one at a time.



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Oct 23, 2007 09:54 |  #4

nirajpatel13 wrote in post #4164700 (external link)
I am graduating from my SD600 to a DSLR for a 4.5 month trip.
...
I am planning on buying the body only.

I won't comment much on XTi vs XT. Yes, the XTi has a better autofocus, anti-dust mechanism, etc. But I don't know how much value you put on those differences compared to the $160 price difference...

It was some other things about your post that bothered me, though.

First, I can't tell from your brief post whether you understand these things, and apologies if you do, but if you buy the body only then you won't be taking any pictures. You need to think carefully about buying a lens or lenses. The lens on your SD600 is roughly equivalent to 22-66mm on an XT or XTi. A popular lens in that range that delivers a lot of quality for the money is the Sigma 17-70mm, but there are loads of others. People here on POTN can help you choose if you need help.

Second, you need to know that a DSLR like the XT or XTi has a long learning curve. You can't expect to just pick one up and take good photos with it. If you don't have time before your trip to get really familiar with a new camera, it might be a better idea not to go down the DSLR route just yet.

Third, an XT or XTi won't take the same memory cards as your SD600. They both take CF cards.

Fourth, if you're going away for 4.5 months then you'll presumably take a *lot* of pictures. You'll need to think through your strategy here. How many gigabytes of CF cards? Will you be visiting places where you can upload your pictures to the web, and if so how regularly? Will you be carrying a laptop for downloading? And so on. I have 5x 2GB cards which means I'm good for up to about 1200 photos on one trip with my 350D (XT).

Fifth, you need to think about batteries. The XT and XTi use a chunky lithium battery called an NB-2LH which is not compatible with your SD600. The cameras come with one battery and an AC charger, but if you're going to be going places where the electricity might not be reliable and/or if you might be taking *lots* of photos and/or if you're going somewhere really cold, then it would be a good idea to get a couple of spares. Canon batteries are pricey but a company called Sterlingtek makes very good ones much more cheaply. I carry two spares with me.

Hope that helps. Apologies if it was all stuff you already knew. If you have any more questions, you've come to the right place.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Oct 23, 2007 11:02 |  #5

I'll vote for the XTi but only after you hold one in your hands. If you have big hands you might not like it.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Oct 23, 2007 12:42 |  #6

If you take the time to do a search on this and other Canon forums you'll find PAGES answering your question.


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ooo
Goldmember
1,765 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: NYC
     
Oct 23, 2007 13:41 |  #7

I'm planning on making my first dslr purchase when I get back to the states as well and I was in the same situation. I ended up deciding that I was going to purchase the xti with the lens just because it seems worth it for the price. I was also planning to get myself a sigma 70-300 macro lens as well =]


.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
prime80
Goldmember
Avatar
2,394 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 83
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Harmony, FL
     
Oct 23, 2007 14:04 |  #8

Definitely get the XTi. While the XT is a great camera, and I loved mine, the XTi improves on it in most of the areas I had problems with the XT. It's definitely worth the price difference.


John
R6, EF 100-400 L IS II, EF 24-70 L II, EF 85 f/1.8
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JackProton
Goldmember
Avatar
2,348 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Oct 23, 2007 14:49 |  #9

Another vote for the XTi. I traded my XT in for the better focusing abilities of the XTi. The XTi also has a bigger LCD screen.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
veteq
Senior Member
259 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jun 2007
     
Oct 23, 2007 15:05 |  #10

JackProton wrote in post #4177914 (external link)
Another vote for the XTi. I traded my XT in for the better focusing abilities of the XTi. The XTi also has a bigger LCD screen.

and more mega pixels (XT=8MP and XTi=10), comes handy when cropping pictures, 20% more "real state".

My vote also goes for the XTI, why bother with a camera that is discontinued, unless it's a lot cheaper.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Oct 23, 2007 15:57 |  #11

kitacanon wrote in post #4177230 (external link)
If you take the time to do a search on this and other Canon forums you'll find PAGES answering your question.

Methinks somebody needs to refresh their acquaintance with Rule 4.9.

If you don't want to be helpful, just don't say anything.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Oct 23, 2007 16:28 |  #12

My own personal experience tells me that the updates in the XTi may be nice, but they are limited and certainly not necessary in order to take good, high quality pictures. After having an XT for a long time and upgrading to the XTi, I think the upgrade was a mistake for the additional cost.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave ­ kadolph
"Fix the cigarette lighter"
Avatar
6,140 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Mar 2007
Location: West Michigan--166.33 miles to the Cook County courthouse
     
Oct 23, 2007 16:58 as a reply to  @ form's post |  #13

We own both

If I had to choose one only it would be the XTI.

It is easier to "chimp" your shots when tripod mounted or in bright light. And as a guy with thick glasses that's important.

But the XT handles high ISO noise better--and is around $150 less that you could spend on glass.

Best of luck with your decision.


Middle age is when you can finally afford the things that a young man could truly enjoy.
Tools of the trade

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MichTa73
Member
37 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Oct 23, 2007 17:42 |  #14

form wrote in post #4178405 (external link)
My own personal experience tells me that the updates in the XTi may be nice, but they are limited and certainly not necessary in order to take good, high quality pictures. After having an XT for a long time and upgrading to the XTi, I think the upgrade was a mistake for the additional cost.

Think that's a waste? I wanna exchange my silver XTi for a black one :confused:


Rebel XTi | 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | 70-200 f/4[COLOR=red]L | 85 f/1.8 | 50 f/1.4 | Quantaray 2x TC | 430ex
http://deepzoompix.com​/Albums.aspx?alias=Mic​hTa73 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsaber
I have no idea what's going on
Avatar
3,536 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Oct 23, 2007 18:12 as a reply to  @ MichTa73's post |  #15

I currently own the XT and its a camera that I highly recommend for people just starting out in the SLR world. One reason I chose the XT over the XTI is the secondary LCD display. For me, that's a must have. Overall, the XT is a great camera and for the price its amazing. The XTI does have better technologies built-in. My vote goes to the XT for the one reason above. It's all up to personal preference though. Hope this helps!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,409 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
Newbie to DSLR: Canon Rebel XT or XTi
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2706 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.