Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 21 Oct 2007 (Sunday) 14:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ugh I hate to ask... new lense or 30d

 
gravy ­ graffix
Goldmember
Avatar
1,134 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Logan Square and Joliet IL
     
Oct 21, 2007 14:54 |  #1

ok, I have a 10d thats like new, im very happy with it, but i have a decision to make... when i get paid form my magazine, im going to either buy a 50-1.8 and a 85 1.8 or .... maybe sell the 10d and add that cash i get to get a 30d. my main concern is better low light shots.

i shot today indoors with a 17-40 f4 @ 1600... im pretty happy with the shutter speeds at around 1/125 sec, but they have a lil more noise than i care for and i dont like running it thru neat image as i cant keep the dirt detailed and looks fake.

so what would improve these shots more? 1.8 glass and lower iso on the 10d
or i really like the 17-40 inside, but maybe on a 30d with better iso..???

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v727/xb8slim/lh/01.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v727/xb8slim/lh/03.jpg

Peoria IL Wedding Photographer (external link) Chicago Wedding Photographers (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SHULTSIE!!!
"Stonehenge wasn't too impressive"
Avatar
3,964 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2006
Location: DC
     
Oct 21, 2007 14:59 |  #2

I vote for the 30D...


Justin
My Gear
My 15 minutes of fame... (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BugEyes
Senior Member
577 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Sweden
     
Oct 21, 2007 15:09 |  #3

Or pick up a used 20D, same low light performance as the 30D, and get one of the lenses for the money saved.
The 20D comes cheap these days.


Kameras, lenses and other stuff
http://www.sorkin.se (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JCH77Yanks
Goldmember
Avatar
1,291 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2007
Location: BKNY
     
Oct 21, 2007 15:09 |  #4

I would go for the 30d for better low light noise performance.


Joe Halliday
7D | XT | 10-22 | 24-105 f/4L | 28 1.8 | 50 1.4 | 85 1.8 | 580EXII | 430EXII | 430EX | Flickr (external link)| 500px (external link) |
Dial "M" for Manual.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SHULTSIE!!!
"Stonehenge wasn't too impressive"
Avatar
3,964 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2006
Location: DC
     
Oct 21, 2007 15:10 |  #5

You could also give the 30D a few more months to depreciate a little more...


Justin
My Gear
My 15 minutes of fame... (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FelixP
Senior Member
Avatar
516 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Cardiff, Wales
     
Oct 21, 2007 15:18 as a reply to  @ SHULTSIE!!!'s post |  #6

I say the 1.8 It'll make much more of a difference, get a used 50mm f1.8 and if you don't like it, sell it for what you brought it for.


1N HS - 1D MKII - 16-35 2.8L II - 50 1.4 - 80-200 2.8L - 550EX - 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gravy ­ graffix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,134 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Logan Square and Joliet IL
     
Oct 21, 2007 15:29 |  #7

im getting the fiddy either way, if i can find one before it sold lol...

ok maybe help me with the "stop" math...
those were taken 1/125 @ 1600.. with f4
if i dropped to 1.8 and kept the 1/125 ss, could i use iso 800? or maybe even 800 and a lil faster shutter?

is 800 to 1600 "1 stop"?


Peoria IL Wedding Photographer (external link) Chicago Wedding Photographers (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gravy ­ graffix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,134 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Logan Square and Joliet IL
     
Oct 21, 2007 15:37 |  #8

hmmm the more i think about it, a 30d and a nifty, should suffice, id love a 85 1.8 but for all intensive purposes the 50 should be fine...


Peoria IL Wedding Photographer (external link) Chicago Wedding Photographers (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JC4
Goldmember
Avatar
2,610 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio
     
Oct 21, 2007 15:59 |  #9

gravy graffix wrote in post #4165178 (external link)
im getting the fiddy either way, if i can find one before it sold lol...

ok maybe help me with the "stop" math...
those were taken 1/125 @ 1600.. with f4
if i dropped to 1.8 and kept the 1/125 ss, could i use iso 800? or maybe even 800 and a lil faster shutter?

is 800 to 1600 "1 stop"?

f/2 is 2 stops faster than f/4. So, you could drop to ISO 400, and shot at 1/160th. (f/1.8 is 2 1/3 stops faster than f/4)


John Caputo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Oct 21, 2007 16:18 |  #10

gravy graffix wrote in post #4165178 (external link)
ok maybe help me with the "stop" math...
those were taken 1/125 @ 1600.. with f4
if i dropped to 1.8 and kept the 1/125 ss, could i use iso 800? or maybe even 800 and a lil faster shutter?
is 800 to 1600 "1 stop"?

Here's how it works: one stop difference is twice (or 1/2) the amount of light.

If you're changing shutter speeds or ISOs, the relationship is linear: from 800 to 1600 is one stop, or twice the light sensitivity. From 1/250 to 1/500 second is one stop, or half the light.

The amount of light coming through the lens depends on the area of the lens opening. Twice the area = twice the light = one stop.

But the area changes as the square of the diameter, and the f stop is a measure of diameter. This means that light varies as the square of the f stop number.

So changing from f/4 to f/2 is two stops, and to f/1.8 is another half stop.

F stop numbers go like this:
1, 1.4, 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22

Notice that each step is 1.414 times the previous one (the square root of 2) so the change in light from one stop to the next one is 2.

HTH.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 21, 2007 16:41 |  #11

Number six,

Thanks for putting that in a post. It give a handy way of pasting that definition into a note that I can remind myself of and to email to others!

Tony


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsmotril
Goldmember
Avatar
2,543 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 402
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Austin TX
     
Oct 21, 2007 16:41 |  #12

I shoot fast moving things in low light. I've been using a 30D for about a year(10D before that), and got a 40D when they first came out. The difference is quite pronounced in the 40's ability to use servo focus and have very low noise at Hi ISO. I'd go for a 40D over the 30D for those reasons if you're really looking for high ISO, high frames per second, and great servo focus performance. If you can't afford one at this time, get the 85 1.8 lens and you'll see a big improvement from that too. Save up and get the 40D later, it is well worth if for the performance you get over the 30D based on my experience with both.


Gear List
Galleries: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/smopho/ (external link) --- http://billsmotrilla.z​enfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gravy ­ graffix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,134 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Logan Square and Joliet IL
     
Oct 21, 2007 17:38 |  #13

man your killing me with the 40d... i do want one for all the reasons mentions, but 800 on top of my 10d is a streatch... i did just find a 50. 1.8 so... look like ill be on a mission to up grade bodies...

pm me what you want for that 20d... and ill think about it.


Peoria IL Wedding Photographer (external link) Chicago Wedding Photographers (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
segasaturn
Senior Member
849 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
     
Oct 22, 2007 13:13 |  #14

Don't forget to consider an XTi.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,182 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
ugh I hate to ask... new lense or 30d
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2723 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.