Difference between 1d Mark II and the 1d Mark II N

So whats the N stand for,I thought they were all the same.any one help?

The N has a larger lcd, can save jpegs & raw files to different cards, and has some "picture modes" for jpegs. Other than that they are the same.

I believe the memory frame buffer is bigger on the N version as well.

Tapeman wrote in post #4166833
The N has a larger lcd, can save jpegs & raw files to different cards, and has some "picture modes" for jpegs. Other than that they are the same.

what tapeman said, i was going to get a MarkII over a IIn but got a III instead do it

CIDER wrote in post #4167052
what tapeman said, i was going to get a MarkII over a IIn but got a III instead do it

I made the same decision, except I actually had to go with the mkII. No mkIII for me until at least 2010, if not later.

To OP, you'll enjoy either camera equally, I'm sure. Save yourself some money and get the mkII if you want, but in addition to the few upgraded features, most mkIIN's will be newer, have lower shutter counts, and will *maybe* hold their resale value a bit more. I got a fantastic deal on my mkII, which is why I went with it.

http://www.dpreview.co​m …canon_eos1dmkii​n&show=all

Hermeto wrote in post #4167381
http://www.dpreview.co​m …canon_eos1dmkii​n&show=all

Notice there's an in-depth review for the Mark II but not the Mark II N. That should tell you something - the II N isn't sufficiently different to warrant a separate review.

Notice the buffer is the same too.

cdifoto wrote in post #4167408
Notice there's an in-depth review for the Mark II but not the Mark II N. That should tell you something - the II N isn't sufficiently different to warrant a separate review.

Notice the buffer is the same too.

I agree, other than larger LCD, everything else looks pretty much the same.

I am surprised that still there is no in depth review for 40D!

Hermeto - it should come soon, it seems DPReview have got the body as there's a more detailed hands-on preview with it than for example the 1Ds III preview.
Or at least will get it soon.
Waiting for them to do the 1D3 review.... maybe they're waiting for the submirror fix...

i'm sure once they have a confirmed working 1dIII there'll be a review and a notice to state the fix available.

cdifoto wrote in post #4167408
Notice the buffer is the same too.

Which is interesting because here (in the Model Line History table)

http://www.dpreview.co​m/previews/canoneos1ds​markiii/

It's different. I wonder which is right?

I thought the 1Ds MkII is only 4fps?

http://www.dpreview.co​m …anon/canon_eos1​dsmkii.asp

JBaz wrote in post #4169617
I thought the 1Ds MkII is only 4fps?

http://www.dpreview.co​m …anon/canon_eos1​dsmkii.asp

Isn't that what it says?

I'm rather happy that I went with the IIN, I did so mostly because I wanted a new camera-- I got it weeks before they were totally gone from the market .

^rossdagley's link shows that both have 5fps...

JBaz wrote in post #4169844
^rossdagley's link shows that both have 5fps...

Oh I see, weird.