What Is A 35 Millimeter Camera?

Sorry about the mix-up.
Try this one Bob.
http://www.damphyne.co​m/gallery/8x10-Negs/02_G?full=1

olz wrote in post #4177456
Show the op some respect wiseguys and use your knowledge to answer his question - isn't that what this forum is for?

I believe I did. See post #2.

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #4180505
This is wrong too, although less wrong.

The "normal" in lenses can't have any less to do with human eye.

A normal lens is one which focal length is equal to the image circle it creates. So a hassy "normal" 80mm is still a normal even if you mount it on a crop camera.

It just so happens that these lenses are designed easier and there is a number of optical aberrations that get cancelled out even in simple designs.

It would be nice if you would read what I said before putting me down. What I said concurrs exactly with what you said.

And the design most often used for "normal" lenses was the symmetrical twin doublet. Very simple, very elegant, very high IQ. But not for SLRs. The damned mirror gets in the way.

20droger wrote in post #4182548
I believe I did. See post #2.

I wrote it that way assuming that people themselves would know who I was referring to. Since you gave the OP a straight answer you where not the intented reciever...

DAMphyne wrote in post #4181940
Sorry about the mix-up.
Try this one Bob.
http://www.damphyne.co​m/gallery/8x10-Negs/02_G?full=1

Seems now to be a 12.5 MP image and is in jpg format, which typically has a minimum of around 6:1 compression. The file size is a little under 3 MB - so, everything is consistent.

Since it is an 8 x 10 neg, the scanning dpi would have been around 300. Just out of curiousity what was your rationale' for choosing that scan resolution, since we generally use much higher resolutions to scan 35 mm negs?

buzzyrabbit wrote in post #4177430
Who remembers the Kodak disc film?

I do - the world's first throwaway camera!