1Ds MkIII production samples from Canon Kenia safari (spanish)

I think it has not been shown here, from the spanish web site: Que sabes de ?

You can read a report about the camera and aslo you can see 21 Mpx sample pictures, just where you see the word MUESTRAS and the thumblepics group is framed. Normal, RAW & ISO test

http://www.quesabesde.​com …ii-prueba-muestras,1_3740

I am sorry, it´s in spanish but you can use a translator ... like:

http://translate.googl​e.com …-8&prev=%2Flanguage_too​ls

Wow! that must be the MOST pampered Safari I have seen...and most important...free! The ISO3200 is REALLY impresive!

I'd have to agree with the 3200 ISO.. That 1200mm lens is INSANE! Holy crap!

marcus769 wrote in post #4185111
I'd have to agree with the 3200 ISO.. That 1200mm lens is INSANE! Holy crap!

Where was that, I could not find it?

I'm not amazed at all by those pics. Either there's some severe heat haze distortion, or they just cannot get a sharp focus. Even the man pic, 70-200 at 200mm. F3.2 - DOF is probably a bit too tight, and sharpest point seems to be a button, slightly in front of face.

1200mm.. Drool

Wazza wrote in post #4185412
I'm not amazed at all by those pics. Either there's some severe heat haze distortion, or they just cannot get a sharp focus. Even the man pic, 70-200 at 200mm. F3.2 - DOF is probably a bit too tight, and sharpest point seems to be a button, slightly in front of face.

1200mm.. Drool

The macro shot was pretty sharp to me.

Noise performance really is quit impressive... looks very good. I agree though that at 21 mpx, I think Canon has not surpassed it's own lenses ability to resolve. Understandably these are jpegs, but they look nothing like the color depth you get out of a Hassey nor the clarity. But the cool thing is at 21 mpx, you have tons of extra information there so it gives you lots of latitude to do what ever needed post to get the images really clean. This should produce some amazing prints. They just need to get the lenses up to the task. A 100-400 hardly hangs in there at 10 mpx... less alone 21.

This is why I firmly believe that 21mp is way overkill, at least for the 35mm arena Mark.

Dave

dpastern wrote in post #4188508
This is why I firmly believe that 21mp is way overkill, at least for the 35mm arena Mark.

Dave

I don't see the reasoning behind that? The Hasselblad H3D-39 has a pixel pitch of 6,8 µm and the 1Ds MKIII has a pixel ptch of 6,4 µm, so going off that way of thinking the Hasselblad is overkill for medium format cameras?