If you were to take a CF card from a camera and put it into another and the frame number dropped from 7500 to 1500, would this signify that one camera had taken 7500 shots and the other 1500?
MrBSnappy Senior Member 400 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Norfolk - UK More info | Oct 24, 2007 19:04 | #1 If you were to take a CF card from a camera and put it into another and the frame number dropped from 7500 to 1500, would this signify that one camera had taken 7500 shots and the other 1500? No matter how much you learn, there's always someone who knows more.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_Cohran Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 24, 2007 19:36 | #2 The frame number won't drop (or shouldn't). The camera will pick up the highest count from the card. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,738 posts Likes: 4072 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Oct 24, 2007 19:41 | #3 You can reset the internal camera frame count to zero though. Then when you plugged in the new card, it would go to 1500. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 25, 2007 02:51 | #4 I took the card out of my 350D where it was reading 7500ish, then put it into my new to me 30D and it dropped to 1500ish. Just wondered if it bore any resemblence to the actual no. of actuations. It would be too good to be true if it was! No matter how much you learn, there's always someone who knows more.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Liang Member 197 posts Joined Jun 2004 Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia More info | Oct 25, 2007 05:14 | #5 I have this problem too. The frame count increase! Canon 5D, 7D, 17-40 F4L, 50 F1.4, 135 F2L, 200 F2.8L, 420EX.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,738 posts Likes: 4072 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Oct 25, 2007 08:59 | #6 Liang wrote in post #4187995 .... I don't want to mess up the frame count. Each camera will have dedicated card. If I really need to mix the cards, I will format it before use. Make sure you format in the PC, not the camera. The pic number is adjusted on the insertion of the card before any other activity is performed. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WaltA Goldmember More info | Oct 25, 2007 10:00 | #7 gjl711 wrote in post #4188741 Make sure you format in the PC, not the camera. The pic number is adjusted on the insertion of the card before any other activity is performed. gjl711 - I tried this and I can't get it to work. I'm using Vista and it says it cannot format this card. Tried both a Lexar and a Sandisk. Not sure the exact error message - will have to check when I get home. Walt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,738 posts Likes: 4072 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Oct 25, 2007 10:07 | #8 WaltA wrote in post #4189113 gjl711 - I tried this and I can't get it to work. I'm using Vista and it says it cannot format this card. Tried both a Lexar and a Sandisk. Not sure the exact error message - will have to check when I get home. Maybe I'll try it on my laptop that has XP. Just a guess as I do not have Vista, but is Vista maybe trying to format using NTFS instead of FAT32? Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Oct 25, 2007 10:09 | #9 Mr B Snappy wrote in post #4187736 I took the card out of my 350D where it was reading 7500ish, then put it into my new to me 30D and it dropped to 1500ish. Just wondered if it bore any resemblence to the actual no. of actuations. It would be too good to be true if it was! IIRC the 350D still used 100 frames/folder; the 30D puts 9999 frames/folder. So the "7500" frame in a 350D represents folder 175 and no shots; the 1500 in a 30D is folder 100 and 1500 shots; I suspect that if you look at the folder numbers on the card you'd find that you've had a folder increment in the 30D and your photos are now going into folder 175. Yes, numbering in these things is screwy if you mix cards. I always format mine in the computer after I've downloaded the images (to at least 2 hard disks and 2 DVDs). Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WaltA Goldmember More info | Oct 25, 2007 10:11 | #10 gjl711 wrote in post #4189152 Just a guess as I do not have Vista, but is Vista maybe trying to format using NTFS instead of FAT32? Don't think so. There was a thread a few months back about this and I specifically remember trying FAT32 Walt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2706 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||