Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 Oct 2007 (Wednesday) 19:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Frame counter question

 
Mr ­ B ­ Snappy
Senior Member
400 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Norfolk - UK
     
Oct 24, 2007 19:04 |  #1

If you were to take a CF card from a camera and put it into another and the frame number dropped from 7500 to 1500, would this signify that one camera had taken 7500 shots and the other 1500?


No matter how much you learn, there's always someone who knows more.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Oct 24, 2007 19:36 |  #2

The frame number won't drop (or shouldn't). The camera will pick up the highest count from the card.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Oct 24, 2007 19:41 |  #3

You can reset the internal camera frame count to zero though. Then when you plugged in the new card, it would go to 1500.

What are you trying to do?


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr ­ B ­ Snappy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
400 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Norfolk - UK
     
Oct 25, 2007 02:51 |  #4

I took the card out of my 350D where it was reading 7500ish, then put it into my new to me 30D and it dropped to 1500ish. Just wondered if it bore any resemblence to the actual no. of actuations. It would be too good to be true if it was!


No matter how much you learn, there's always someone who knows more.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Liang
Member
Avatar
197 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
     
Oct 25, 2007 05:14 |  #5

I have this problem too. The frame count increase!

I sent in my 30D to Canon for AF calibrating recently. Before sending in, the frame count was 3000+. When return, the frame count became 9000+!

I was shock! I thought they have done 6000 shots just for calibrating. After I did some research on this issue. I found out what Mark Cohran said is true. The camera will pick up the highest count from the card.

From now on, I don't mix the cards with 2 camera. I don't want to mess up the frame count. Each camera will have dedicated card. If I really need to mix the cards, I will format it before use.


Canon 5D, 7D, 17-40 F4L, 50 F1.4, 135 F2L, 200 F2.8L, 420EX.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Oct 25, 2007 08:59 |  #6

Liang wrote in post #4187995 (external link)
.... I don't want to mess up the frame count. Each camera will have dedicated card. If I really need to mix the cards, I will format it before use.

Make sure you format in the PC, not the camera. The pic number is adjusted on the insertion of the card before any other activity is performed.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WaltA
Goldmember
Avatar
3,871 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Ladysmith, BC, Canada
     
Oct 25, 2007 10:00 |  #7

gjl711 wrote in post #4188741 (external link)
Make sure you format in the PC, not the camera. The pic number is adjusted on the insertion of the card before any other activity is performed.

gjl711 - I tried this and I can't get it to work. I'm using Vista and it says it cannot format this card. Tried both a Lexar and a Sandisk. Not sure the exact error message - will have to check when I get home.

Maybe I'll try it on my laptop that has XP.


Walt
400D, 5D, 7D and a bag of stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Oct 25, 2007 10:07 |  #8

WaltA wrote in post #4189113 (external link)
gjl711 - I tried this and I can't get it to work. I'm using Vista and it says it cannot format this card. Tried both a Lexar and a Sandisk. Not sure the exact error message - will have to check when I get home.

Maybe I'll try it on my laptop that has XP.

Just a guess as I do not have Vista, but is Vista maybe trying to format using NTFS instead of FAT32?


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Oct 25, 2007 10:09 |  #9

Mr B Snappy wrote in post #4187736 (external link)
I took the card out of my 350D where it was reading 7500ish, then put it into my new to me 30D and it dropped to 1500ish. Just wondered if it bore any resemblence to the actual no. of actuations. It would be too good to be true if it was!

IIRC the 350D still used 100 frames/folder; the 30D puts 9999 frames/folder. So the "7500" frame in a 350D represents folder 175 and no shots; the 1500 in a 30D is folder 100 and 1500 shots; I suspect that if you look at the folder numbers on the card you'd find that you've had a folder increment in the 30D and your photos are now going into folder 175. Yes, numbering in these things is screwy if you mix cards. I always format mine in the computer after I've downloaded the images (to at least 2 hard disks and 2 DVDs).


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WaltA
Goldmember
Avatar
3,871 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Ladysmith, BC, Canada
     
Oct 25, 2007 10:11 |  #10

gjl711 wrote in post #4189152 (external link)
Just a guess as I do not have Vista, but is Vista maybe trying to format using NTFS instead of FAT32?

Don't think so. There was a thread a few months back about this and I specifically remember trying FAT32

I'll make a test tonight on Vista and XP and see what results I get.


Walt
400D, 5D, 7D and a bag of stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,352 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Frame counter question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2706 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.