Let me know what you guys think. CC welcome. Thanks
1.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
ToddGood Senior Member 295 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2007 More info | Oct 30, 2007 07:19 | #1 Let me know what you guys think. CC welcome. Thanks 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2007 07:20 | #2 9. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
17. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
25.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
asxu Senior Member 946 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: brisbane, australia More info | Oct 30, 2007 07:32 | #5 this couple looks very familiar, you shot an engagement session for them - right? for the sake of easy comment and critique, it would be great if you could number them. tim. seventeen. male. simple. employed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2007 07:36 | #6 asxu wrote in post #4217411 this couple looks very familiar, you shot an engagement session for them - right? for the sake of easy comment and critique, it would be great if you could number them. Yes I shoot the engagement session a few weeks prior to the wedding. Pics are numbered, thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sblais I am silly 3,532 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Ottawa, ON (Canada, eh!) More info | Oct 30, 2007 07:43 | #7 You did a good job Sebastien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
asxu Senior Member 946 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: brisbane, australia More info | Oct 30, 2007 07:47 | #8 sblais wrote in post #4217460 Plus, they really look grainy. I'm not sure if it's the web compression, an artistic effect on your part or if you are shooting with a Noink ?i noticed this too, not sure if you were going for the look though.. if you weren't intentionally running them through neat image or noise ninja is pretty much a must. tim. seventeen. male. simple. employed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stathunter "I am no one really" 5,659 posts Likes: 60 Joined Aug 2006 Location: California & Michigan More info | Oct 30, 2007 08:09 | #9 Great job Todd! Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trantz Member 120 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Detroit, Windsor, Kitchener or Toronto, sometimes all in the same day More info | Oct 30, 2007 09:25 | #10 20 looks great - way to organize everyone and keep the composition very balanced troy shantz is trantz photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2007 10:10 | #11 sblais wrote in post #4217460 You did a good job But there are just too many pictures for me to comment on all of them individually. I really like #12. He seems like he's just having so much fun! I just wished you had a few that showed strong emotion between the bride and groom. Plus, they really look grainy. I'm not sure if it's the web compression, an artistic effect on your part or if you are shooting with a Noink ?There wasn't much emotion this wedding, to be honest no one even cried. The grainess in some of the photos were not completely intended, but I think I edited they to work well. stathunter wrote in post #4217570 Great job Todd! EDIT-- by the way what camera and eqipment are you using? Canon 30D with some L glass. trantz wrote in post #4217976 20 looks great - way to organize everyone and keep the composition very balanced Thanks, I'll be honest it wasn't easy at all, but my assistant (my wife) helps me out big time to organize shots like this one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrsOpie Goldmember 1,014 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah More info | #2 bothers me because of the junk on either sides of the dress. You could have move the shoes a little closer to the dress and cropped out the junk. the rest of the images are great. I feel like your black and white conversion is a little flat. My fav is the one with the fisheye lens. -OpieFoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
megansmom Member 73 posts Joined Aug 2007 More info | Todd, I really like a lot of these images... they have this classic, clean feel that I really enjoy looking at. My fave is #1, 2, 8, 12, 15, and 20. The couple will love these.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cccp145 Senior Member 261 posts Joined Oct 2006 More info | Oct 30, 2007 12:13 | #14 Nice job, keep it up
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2007 12:49 | #15 MrsOpie wrote in post #4218547 #2 bothers me because of the junk on either sides of the dress. You could have move the shoes a little closer to the dress and cropped out the junk. the rest of the images are great. I feel like your black and white conversion is a little flat. My fav is the one with the fisheye lens. Yeah your right about shot #2. Do you have any suggestions on how to make the black & white images POP? I have a love for fisheye shots, I don't know why, just do. megansmom wrote in post #4218885 Todd, I really like a lot of these images... they have this classic, clean feel that I really enjoy looking at. My fave is #1, 2, 8, 12, 15, and 20. The couple will love these. Thanks Megan, I really appreciate the kind words. cccp145 wrote in post #4218909 Nice job, keep it up Thanks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1837 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||