ok im contradicting myself on these to buy. mostly want the lowest f stop like a 1.2 or 1.4 but reason is i want it for more indoor potraits wedding and pics. not sure which is the better choice out of them to get
rangersvtsplash Senior Member 634 posts Joined May 2003 More info | Oct 30, 2007 19:05 | #1 ok im contradicting myself on these to buy. mostly want the lowest f stop like a 1.2 or 1.4 but reason is i want it for more indoor potraits wedding and pics. not sure which is the better choice out of them to get Canon EOS 40D + BG-E2 Zoom Lens EF-S 17-85mm 1:4-5.6 IS USM with EW-71B Hood, 50mm f1.8 II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
montreal Goldmember 1,194 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Trondheim, Norway More info | Oct 30, 2007 19:06 | #2 85mm on a 40d isn't wide enough for portraits, in my opinion. I would go with the 50mm. 5D - 17-40L, 70-200L f4, 50 f1.4, PowerShot A430
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S2000 Senior Member 515 posts Joined Jan 2007 More info | Oct 30, 2007 19:07 | #3 I have the 1.4 and like it (light too). It does a nice job with portraits....but then again I'm not a wedding photographer making a living with my gear. ....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
UnityGain Senior Member 255 posts Joined Oct 2007 More info | Permanent banI'd go with the 50 for portraits on a 40d.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DocFrankenstein Cream of the Crop 12,324 posts Likes: 13 Joined Apr 2004 Location: where the buffalo roam More info | Oct 30, 2007 21:20 | #5 Unity Gain wrote in post #4221603 Plus, the 50mm Canon 1.4 has a more useable dynamic range than the 85 1.8. The 85 is very contrasty and can be more unforgiving on people. Lenses have dynamic range? National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
UnityGain Senior Member 255 posts Joined Oct 2007 More info | Oct 31, 2007 02:06 | #6 Permanent banoh puleeze....you know exactly what I mean
LOG IN TO REPLY |
condyk Africa's #1 Tour Guide 20,887 posts Likes: 22 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Birmingham, UK More info | Oct 31, 2007 02:16 | #7 On a crop I would go 50mm and on FF 85mm ... in fact, I have https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1203740
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DocFrankenstein Cream of the Crop 12,324 posts Likes: 13 Joined Apr 2004 Location: where the buffalo roam More info | Oct 31, 2007 02:21 | #8 Unity Gain wrote in post #4223630 oh puleeze....you know exactly what I mean The 50 will keep more detail in the highlights and detail in the shadows in comparison to the 85 BTW - i know this from experience and not from reading little nerd charts on the internets I'll be damned if I anybody can tell the image quality difference between the two primes at f/4. I certainly can't. National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_Cohran Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 31, 2007 09:56 | #9 DocFrankenstein wrote in post #4223664 I'll be damned if I anybody can tell the image quality difference between the two primes at f/4. I certainly can't. Me either. And lenses have no impact on the dynamic range capture by the sensor. I think Unity doesn't understand the term. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Harleypugs I love camera porn.....makes me hawt.... ;-) More info | Oct 31, 2007 11:12 | #10 I would go Sigma 30 1.4 on the 40D...it is more like a 50 on FF 5dMKIII/grip - 24-105 4.0 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pete-eos Goldmember 1,999 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2006 Location: SW London UK More info | Oct 31, 2007 11:52 | #11 Harleypugs wrote in post #4225855 I would go Sigma 30 1.4 on the 40D...it is more like a 50 on FF What he said or the Canon 28 f/1.8... take your 17-85, set it to 30 50 and 85, walk around your house and see what works...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2889 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||