How does my new 17-55 look? Both taken at around 50mm, ISO100, f/8.0, 100% crops, custom WB, and center focus. RAWS converted to jpg w/ no other PP in LR.
Looks damn sharp to me.
17-55mm
28-135mm
jtown Member 228 posts Joined Sep 2007 More info | Oct 30, 2007 23:12 | #1 How does my new 17-55 look? Both taken at around 50mm, ISO100, f/8.0, 100% crops, custom WB, and center focus. RAWS converted to jpg w/ no other PP in LR. 28-135mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
khnordeen Senior Member 373 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Newark, CA More info | Oct 30, 2007 23:15 | #2 this just makes me even more excited about ordering my 17-55
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2007 23:17 | #3 I wonder what an L would look like. I guess I'll have to wait until Christmas for that test though. Haha. This is my first lens after the kit so I have no idea if this is really slick or not.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xarqi Cream of the Crop  10,435 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand More info | Oct 30, 2007 23:24 | #4 Looks good. How do they compare wide open?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
toneyw Senior Member  376 posts Joined May 2007 Location: San Francisco, CA More info | Oct 30, 2007 23:29 | #5 Since I got my 17-55, I haven't used my 28-135. Most likely going to sell it. Canon 30D Gripped
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ItsMike Goldmember  2,185 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Greenlawn NY More info | Oct 30, 2007 23:36 | #6 |
BigBlueDodge Goldmember  3,726 posts Joined May 2005 Location: Lonestar State More info | Oct 30, 2007 23:38 | #7 Mike, David (aka BigBlueDodge)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2007 23:40 | #8 Shoot. I don't know where I downloaded it from anymore, but I did find the link from this forum.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2007 23:42 | #9 xarqi wrote in post #4223109  Looks good. How do they compare wide open? I could try to do this at f/3.5 because my kit lens will only go that big. Otherwise it'd be unfair. Lemme go try.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xarqi Cream of the Crop 10,435 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand More info | Oct 30, 2007 23:44 | #10 jtown wrote in post #4223193 I could try to do this at f/3.5 because my kit lens will only go that big. Otherwise it'd be unfair. Lemme go try. Fair? FAIR?? Who cares about fair? Let's see that 17-55 shine!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ItsMike Goldmember 2,185 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Greenlawn NY More info | Oct 30, 2007 23:51 | #11 Got it.. Thanks.. I will post one of my 17-55, 24-105, and 50 1.4. Ill try to go all at 50mm@ F8..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2007 23:55 | #12 HAHA! You're right ... who cares about my kit lens now ... in fact it wouldn't even stop down to f/3.5 ... it would only go to f/4.5. Here's the 17-55 at 2.8, same setup as above and the f/8.0 for camprison: 17-55mm @ f/2.8 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xarqi Cream of the Crop 10,435 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand More info | Oct 30, 2007 23:58 | #13 Sweet!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigBlueDodge Goldmember 3,726 posts Joined May 2005 Location: Lonestar State More info | Oct 31, 2007 00:00 | #14 The 17-55 is very sharp wide open. It's such a nice lens. People who shun EF-S don't know what they are missing out on. David (aka BigBlueDodge)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ItsMike Goldmember 2,185 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Greenlawn NY More info | Oct 31, 2007 00:08 | #15 I can agree anymore... I love my 17-55, Crazy sharp, and not as heavy as my other L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1460 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
