Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 31 Oct 2007 (Wednesday) 11:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1st Client

 
djscottwalls
Member
94 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Oct 31, 2007 11:30 |  #1

I have done some portraits and now I have a client that wants me to do their wedding. The people are very laid back and are amature photographers them selfs. I am going to be shooting their wedding in sections (which is good for me)

1. in the morning I am going to the hair salon to meet with them and get some of the pictures of the mother, sister, and bride getting the hair done.

Then I get a couple hour break (luckley my house is 5 minutes away)

2. They are doing a Beach Wedding at 2:00 pm, so I decided that I should be there 45 minutes earlier to get used to the set up.

3. The "Family Photos" there after, they stated that they would line up everyone for me in the oder that they want the pictures taken. (No backdrops or anything like that / ALL Natural)

4. After that they are having a private party around 5:00 - 6:00 pm back on the beach. This is where I belive that I will get my money shoots of the Bride and Groom and their Groomsmen and Brides Maids. (I will have less people and be able to work with them better)

ok now for the questions.

1. I charged them $650 for the weeding. They asked for a cd of the Images so I told them I would do 25 / 75 % (keeping the images that I spend some time on and giving them the throwaway pictures danceing, drunk people, crowd shots and keeping the Cake Pictuers, Bride and groom, et al.)

2. At the hair salon I will use Manual to take all the pictures seeing that I have some time to think and get the pictures right.

at the wedding I was going to use the AV mode so I can just control the depth of field.

family pictures I will go back to manual

reception go back to the av

afterparty use manual

3. There is also a profesional "film" photograher that is retiered and going to help me with some shoots. But does not know anything about digital, but should be helpfull. And my wife will be there helping me out as well. (The profesesional is the one that refered them to me and also he is a guest of the wedding)

Hopefull things will turn out all right.

Also at the 2:00 wedding on the beach I will be useing a polarizing filter as well (is this the right idea)

Thanks for your time and help. This is my first wedding and I am a little bit nervous.

Scott


Scott Walls :) www.scottwallsphoto.co​m (external link)

Canon 50D | Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG | Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM | Canon Speedlite 580EX II | AlienBees 800 | Pocket Wizard Plus II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GertS
Senior Member
353 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Gone
     
Oct 31, 2007 13:41 |  #2

I couldn't find any question. :) So it seems that you know what you are doing.

Do they accept your plan about the images? Just wondering about this combination.

One advice, don't plan the last details long ahead. Things come always the other way. It's good to know the intended plan, but checking each detail off, this has never worked.
I decide at the local situation which camera mode, not long before.

You didn't mention when it will take place. ;)

In your signature I see that there is 1 camera. Backup?

Good luck


- left forum in protest -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil ­ V
Goldmember
1,977 posts
Likes: 75
Joined Jan 2005
Location: S Yorks UK
     
Oct 31, 2007 14:35 |  #3

djscottwalls wrote in post #4225950 (external link)
Also at the 2:00 wedding on the beach I will be useing a polarizing filter as well (is this the right idea)

Scott

This appears to be your only question, the answer's 'Maybe', if you are used to using a polarising filter and can manipulate it to great effect in a fast moving environment, then go for it.

The rest of the post wasn't really a question, but the points I've picked up on beg some questions to me;

1.5 why no 'getting ready' shots at the brides house, you'll miss some great opportunities.

2 You should know the setup beforehand if you're inexperienced. 45 minutes early will get you there with not much time to spare before you're shooting the grooms arrival, then the families - bridesmaids - before you know it the Bride's arrived and you haven't caught your breath.

3.5 This is where you should be organising your B&G portraits, between the family stuff and the party. You don't really want to be taking them away from the party for posed pic's.

4 The party is where you'll get all the great candid opportunities.

Then to point 1 that wasn't a question. If you're already charging for portraits, how does this price hold up to your other work? Unless my only income was Photography I wouldn't charge for what amounts to a 'practice run' I'd be glad of the opportunity. However that's down to personal circumstances.

Are you asking about camera modes? <rant>I have regularly said that it makes no difference whatsoever what mode your camera is in. The important function is to know your meter, when to trust it and when to override it.</rant> The only time it makes a real difference is when using flash, indoors you should use Manual for your flash exposures, the Auto modes will push you around.

Lots of WP's swear by Manual for it's more consistent exposures, but I never have problems with consistency when using AV. I find my wife / shooting partner does have more exposure inconsistency, but using the semi auto modes keeps her in the ballpark. I fear if she shot manual she'd keep forgetting to re-meter causing even more problems.


As was picked up above;
If you're charging you are morally obliged to have a backup of everything, If you're working for free and have a camera go down, a heartfelt apology isn't enough but they have no real basis to sue you. If you've charged them and you have equipment failure that stops you performing - that's a disaster of immense magnitude, both for them and for you.

Good luck.


Gear List
website: South Yorkshire Wedding photographer in Doncaster (external link)
Twitter (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jamiewexler
Goldmember
Avatar
2,032 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Grafton, MA
     
Oct 31, 2007 14:47 |  #4

Phil pretty much said everything that I would have said, but I'll add that you might want to take a couple of practice shots of someone in white on a beach at the same time of day with that polarizer. Though I don't use one myself (I bought one but haven't had the opportunity to put it on at a wedding ceremony), I was having a conversation with a friend of mine in town, and he claimed that he used a polarizer once, and that the added contrast was too much and really blew out the dress. Again, this is hearsay, but I respect the guy as a photog, and have thought twice about using my polarizer for anything but church exteriors since...


Massachusetts Wedding Photographer (external link)
My blog (external link)
my facebook (external link)
my gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GertS
Senior Member
353 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Gone
     
Oct 31, 2007 15:27 |  #5

Scott,

Get immediately your web site the "about" section regarding spelling done. Being not an native English speaker, even I lived quit a while in New Zealand, I see immediately "Collage" instead "College". Never heard of "Meseum", probably "Museum". There are some other things too.
A web site should be free of spelling / grammar errors. It's not a forum where you jot down some words and there is not much need of correct spelling. A web site is like a business card, the first impression counts.

Often the problem is that you don't notice such things as you read the text from memory. Ask someone else to have a look on it too.

More stunning shots would be much better than the list of your photography education. Nobody is interested in courses you visited, whereas stunning shots persuade the interested person. :)
Having visited a course doesn't mean that you can do it well. ;)

This reply is not intended to criticize your homepage, it's aim is giving you some advice to improve it. I wanted to see your style and had a look.


- left forum in protest -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 31, 2007 15:51 |  #6

You'd be better off spending all day with them, to capture the little things. The model for the CD sounds odd, i'd give them all the images as shot but show them the difference between as-shot and fully processed so they can purchase prints if they want to. I'd also suggest spending a bit of time in similar lighting scenarios to weddings, if you're not sure about your exposure you'll have some pretty big problems on the day.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
djscottwalls
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
94 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Oct 31, 2007 15:55 |  #7

ok corrected the spelling. I had one more thing is ask, I have a Canon40D and when doing the wedding do everything in raw and then at the reception do everything in sraw. Would that work. One other thing is that I will not be pulling them away to do any posing. They are haveing the after party back at the beach for a small number of people, and they stated that it might be a better oppertunity to get pictures of everyone. I am also useing a film camera as a backup camera.

Scott


Scott Walls :) www.scottwallsphoto.co​m (external link)

Canon 50D | Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG | Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM | Canon Speedlite 580EX II | AlienBees 800 | Pocket Wizard Plus II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GertS
Senior Member
353 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Gone
     
Nov 01, 2007 01:22 |  #8

djscottwalls wrote in post #4227584 (external link)
I had one more thing is ask, I have a Canon40D and when doing the wedding do everything in raw and then at the reception do everything in sraw. Would that work. One other thing is that I will not be pulling them away to do any posing. They are haveing the after party back at the beach for a small number of people, and they stated that it might be a better oppertunity to get pictures of everyone.

Why shooting mixed RAW formats? SRAW can only processed with DPP at the moment, it depends on your work flow.
I don't have a camera with SRAW and can't judge the quality of it. I shoot everything in RAW no matter of size of the files.
Honestly, get more CF cards and use only one system, even if it fits more on a memory card using SRAW.

Regarding posing, be prepared to pose groups as PJ style will never get certain group shots people are asking. There are heaps of great opportunities to shoot unposed.
Keep in mind that it's a wedding and party, not a photo shooting. ;)


- left forum in protest -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil ­ V
Goldmember
1,977 posts
Likes: 75
Joined Jan 2005
Location: S Yorks UK
     
Nov 01, 2007 02:12 |  #9

I missed the bit about keeping images back, that's the weirdest thing I've seen. You seem to have missed the part about them being THEIR wedding photo's. They pay us to shoot and to produce a product for them. That product should be based on our artistic vision of the day, either all the keepers (as proofs or on cd as their product), or a selection in an album. The selection would be based on quality and art, not what we think we can get reprint sales from?

What possible use is there in 'keeping back' THEIR pictures, other than to make money? It's not a business model I've seen before, and bears more relation to kidnapping than to providing a service.


Gear List
website: South Yorkshire Wedding photographer in Doncaster (external link)
Twitter (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Nov 01, 2007 06:25 |  #10

djscottwalls wrote in post #4227584 (external link)
ok corrected the spelling. I had one more thing is ask, I have a Canon40D and when doing the wedding do everything in raw and then at the reception do everything in sraw. Would that work. One other thing is that I will not be pulling them away to do any posing. They are haveing the after party back at the beach for a small number of people, and they stated that it might be a better oppertunity to get pictures of everyone. I am also useing a film camera as a backup camera.

Scott

From my understanding, sraw is a lesser quality output is it not? I would stick to full raw for the best possible shots. Is your film camera an slr or compact?

Phil V wrote in post #4230931 (external link)
I missed the bit about keeping images back, that's the weirdest thing I've seen. You seem to have missed the part about them being THEIR wedding photo's. They pay us to shoot and to produce a product for them. That product should be based on our artistic vision of the day, either all the keepers (as proofs or on cd as their product), or a selection in an album. The selection would be based on quality and art, not what we think we can get reprint sales from?

What possible use is there in 'keeping back' THEIR pictures, other than to make money? It's not a business model I've seen before, and bears more relation to kidnapping than to providing a service.

I noticed this too - I usually provide the pictures the other way around - give the couple the best of the lot as prints and everything else that is worth processing is processed and goes onto CD/DVD. I certainly don't give them the "Throw away" shots. These get thrown away!


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 01, 2007 06:29 |  #11

Don't shoot sRaw, spend the $100 to get more memory cards.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
takeyourpic
Member
168 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Nov 01, 2007 10:54 |  #12

I am amazed at how people will put themselves in a situation that could end up very badly. This is on both ends. The B/G are "photographers" and yet they hire someone with limited experience/equipment. I am guessing that their experience might be on the same level. I just hope that you understand that with this being your first wedding to shoot that you will probably encounter things that you will never even think to ask on here. I shoot weddings almost every weekend and there are still things that come up that require experience and quick thinking.
Just make sure that the B/G know your limits and make sure that you have a contract.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
djscottwalls
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
94 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Nov 01, 2007 14:09 |  #13

Dont forget that I there will be a retiered profesional photographer that is going to help me out the whole way through the shoot. He has done wedding for over 30 years.

1. He is the one that recomended me
2. He told me that he would be there to help me with the posseing

Also I am not a newbee (maybe to a wedding) but I have been shooting picture for over 10 years and I am fully comfterbul with the Canon 40d, I am just asking to see what other people are doing and how they will handel situations. If I go through everything several times I am less likely to make a mistake. No matter what portrait of wedding you shoot; you will always walk away with thinking of new ideas and better way of handeling/shooting the situation.


Scott Walls :) www.scottwallsphoto.co​m (external link)

Canon 50D | Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG | Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM | Canon Speedlite 580EX II | AlienBees 800 | Pocket Wizard Plus II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,846 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
1st Client
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2441 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.