Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 01 Nov 2007 (Thursday) 12:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Yet Another Cactus V2 Thread... different receivers and strobist antenna mod

 
ghostman
Member
237 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Nov 01, 2007 12:11 |  #1

Hi,

I've been on the fence about the Cactus V2s, due to complaints about their general reliability. But while browsing the Gadget Infinity website, I noticed they had two different V2 receivers:

4-Channel Wireless Flash Receiver V2 (for V2 Trigger) (external link)

4-Channel Wireless Flash Receiver V2s for Vivitar 285HV (external link)

I don't understand the difference, even with their description. The first (cheaper) one mentions compatibility with 580EX and 430EX. The second one lists 580EX and 430EX as compatible within the page, along with compatibility with a bunch of other flashes and a warning of 12V flashes. Will the first one not work with Sunpak 383 and Vivitar 285HVs? Which one are people getting?

And, on a side note about the Cactus V2s... has anyone tried the strobist mod? The receiver battery mod seems like it would solve my gripe with the expensive batteries (assuming I can use NiMHs) and the transmitter mod seems to increase range and reliability. Just like to see someone else also give this a shot.

http://strobist.blogsp​ot.com …-cactus-v2s-mod-page.html (external link)
http://www.flickr.com …iscuss/72157602​622255547/ (external link)


Canon Rebel XTi (400D), Canon 70-200mm f/4L, Tamron f/2.8 28-75mm, Canon f/3.5-5.6 10-22mm, Canon f/1.8 50mm, S-M-C Takumar f/1.4 50mm, Nikon f/1.8 50mm E Series, 2xCanon 430EX, Canon 540EZ, Sunpak 5000AF, Minolta 4000AF, Velbon MAXi, Dynatran CF994

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lotto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,750 posts
Likes: 192
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Nov 01, 2007 15:28 |  #2

Some users reported problems of the first trigger with the 285HV because of the Vivitar's lower trigger voltage, so they came out with the version 2 of the V2. Both should work with the Sunpak 383.

I use the 16 chanel version because I don't trust my flash on the Catus tilting bracket, and the fact its receiver uses AAA battery.

I've done my shares of the attena mods with mix results:lol: this is the my latest.

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2123/1815978898_cbbddf225f.jpg

5D, 24-105L, 70-200L IS, 85mm Art, Godox

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rhys
Dis-Membered
Avatar
5,351 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
Location: Columbia SC
     
Nov 01, 2007 15:29 |  #3

ghostman wrote in post #4233024 (external link)
Hi,

I've been on the fence about the Cactus V2s, due to complaints about their general reliability. But while browsing the Gadget Infinity website, I noticed they had two different V2 receivers:

4-Channel Wireless Flash Receiver V2 (for V2 Trigger) (external link)

4-Channel Wireless Flash Receiver V2s for Vivitar 285HV (external link)

I don't understand the difference, even with their description. The first (cheaper) one mentions compatibility with 580EX and 430EX. The second one lists 580EX and 430EX as compatible within the page, along with compatibility with a bunch of other flashes and a warning of 12V flashes. Will the first one not work with Sunpak 383 and Vivitar 285HVs? Which one are people getting?

And, on a side note about the Cactus V2s... has anyone tried the strobist mod? The receiver battery mod seems like it would solve my gripe with the expensive batteries (assuming I can use NiMHs) and the transmitter mod seems to increase range and reliability. Just like to see someone else also give this a shot.

http://strobist.blogsp​ot.com …-cactus-v2s-mod-page.html (external link)
http://www.flickr.com …iscuss/72157602​622255547/ (external link)

My experience of the cheap ebay triggers is bad. Don't waste your money on them. Save the little you'd spend on things that won't work and put it towards something that will work instead.


Rhys

The empire conquers yet more galaxies:
www.sageworld.co.uk (external link)
www.sageworld.org (external link)
www.sagephotoworld.com (external link)
Blog: http://360.yahoo.com/t​hunderintheheavens (external link)

Free cheese comes only in mousetraps

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ghostman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
237 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Nov 01, 2007 16:06 |  #4

Lotto wrote in post #4234032 (external link)
Some users reported problems of the first trigger with the 285HV because of the Vivitar's lower trigger voltage, so they came out with the version 2 of the V2. Both should work with the Sunpak 383.

I use the 16 chanel version because I don't trust my flash on the Catus tilting bracket, and the fact its receiver uses AAA battery.

I've done my shares of the attena mods with mix results:lol: this is the my latest.


Does the 16-channel 1/4" phone plug version work with Canon 430EX and 580EX? I'm guessing they work just fine with the Sunpak 383 and Vivitar 285HVs.

EDIT: Scratch that question... I notice those were what you tested with in your review:
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=273624

Hmm... mixed results on the mods.


Canon Rebel XTi (400D), Canon 70-200mm f/4L, Tamron f/2.8 28-75mm, Canon f/3.5-5.6 10-22mm, Canon f/1.8 50mm, S-M-C Takumar f/1.4 50mm, Nikon f/1.8 50mm E Series, 2xCanon 430EX, Canon 540EZ, Sunpak 5000AF, Minolta 4000AF, Velbon MAXi, Dynatran CF994

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lotto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,750 posts
Likes: 192
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Nov 02, 2007 03:11 |  #5

The mix results I got were the length of the attena made a big difference. Without the attena, I got about 40 ft range. With a 3 inch antena, got about 50-60 ft. With a 8.5 inch antena, got over 100 ft. Now with the antena between 3.5 and 8 inches, it wouldn't fire :(


5D, 24-105L, 70-200L IS, 85mm Art, Godox

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tnicol
Member
Avatar
222 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Chicago suburbs
     
Nov 02, 2007 08:43 |  #6

Does anyone mess with the receiver antenna too or just the transmitter?


Tom...
http://www.tomnicolpho​tography.com (external link)
http://tnicol.blogspot​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,453 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Yet Another Cactus V2 Thread... different receivers and strobist antenna mod
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1651 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.