nburwell Goldmember  1,265 posts Likes: 11 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Wilmington, DE More info | Nov 02, 2007 14:42 | #1 Similiar to my "sunset" shot I posted. Although this is after the sun set, and the lights of NYC came on. I was on the fence as to whether or not I should include the rocks in the foreground, but you can all tell me what you think.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dataxy.com Member  91 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Nov 02, 2007 14:45 | #2 |
Dan_S Goldmember  1,052 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: UK More info | Nov 03, 2007 07:40 | #3 Nice shot, i dont mind the rocks being there. Canon 450D - Canon 50 1.8 - Canon 10-22 - Canon 55-250 is - Sigma 17-70 - ixus P&S
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lingham Senior Member  425 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Leamington Spa More info | Nov 10, 2007 12:26 | #4 this crop works better for me
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drocpsu Senior Member 472 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2007 Location: New Hampshire More info | Nice shot. I like the colors. Taken from Jersey City? http://www.flickr.com/photos/drocpsu
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Turntablist Senior Member 431 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: VA More info | Nov 17, 2007 01:02 | #6 i like the photo without the rocks. if the rocks were more defined then i'd probably like it more. pain is temporary. glory is forever. -Kru
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is slipper1963 1574 guests, 174 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
