Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 02 Nov 2007 (Friday) 23:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

too much noise in my pictures

 
Sauk
Goldmember
Avatar
4,149 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Sandy, UT
     
Nov 03, 2007 11:22 |  #16

Donte wrote in post #4243433 (external link)
This is what I use for noise reduction software

http://www.picturecode​.com/ (external link)

agree!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan-o
Goldmember
Avatar
3,539 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: So. Cal.
     
Nov 03, 2007 11:30 |  #17

You shot that at 1600 iso witch you didn't need for that shot. If you were just trying to expose the screen you could have gotten away with allot lower iso and helped with the noise.


Danny.
DMunsonPhoto (external link)
Cycling Illustrated (external link)
FaceBook Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tomdlgns
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
541 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Nov 03, 2007 11:32 |  #18

interesting...i will turn my projector on right now and take a pic at each iso level and i will keep the other specs the same


none

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tomdlgns
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
541 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Nov 03, 2007 11:42 |  #19

ok so i snapped some pics...i do get better results with a lower iso...but what if i am shooting something bright with a dark background??? wouldn't the long exposure on my subject, if needed, cause noise?

but it sounds like there is no way to eliminate noise 100% unless using some software...i just want to make sure its not something that i am doing.

thanks


none

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan-o
Goldmember
Avatar
3,539 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: So. Cal.
     
Nov 03, 2007 11:43 |  #20

You shot in manual, so just set it to spot meter and meter off the screen and you should get plenty of shutter speed with that same aperture.


Danny.
DMunsonPhoto (external link)
Cycling Illustrated (external link)
FaceBook Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan-o
Goldmember
Avatar
3,539 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: So. Cal.
     
Nov 03, 2007 11:48 |  #21

If you are shooting something bright you won't need a long exposure.
Take for example the moon a lot of people starting out think you need a long exposure because it is at night.
Unfortunately the camera doesn't have the same dynamic range as your eyes so a lot of the time you are shooting a happy medium, expose for one or the other or take multiple exposures and use HDR.


Danny.
DMunsonPhoto (external link)
Cycling Illustrated (external link)
FaceBook Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Nov 03, 2007 12:40 |  #22

tomdlgns wrote in post #4244708 (external link)
http://img115.imagesha​ck.us …5/4422/img0569c​opyek1.jpg (external link)

there is a link to the pic. i resized it 50% in mspaint just so you guys can see what i see.

i am not shooting on raw, i think that pic was taken at the highest res.

thanks.

Not "too much noise" for the settings used IMO.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Nov 03, 2007 12:55 |  #23

scrumpy wrote in post #4243426 (external link)
Never heard of this before. I shoot nothing but RAW and don't own any noise reduction software. Anyone else know about it?

i don't use noise reduction but i also don't shoot higher than iso 1600.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tunin
Goldmember
Avatar
1,193 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2007
Location: New York, NY - Medjugorje, BiH
     
Nov 03, 2007 13:28 |  #24

I use NIK DFINE 2.0 and i love it. I think they have TRIAL you could try. www.niksoftware.com (external link)


I am not young enough to know everything. O.W.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Niraj
Senior Member
Avatar
859 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Nov 03, 2007 16:42 |  #25

high ISO and under exposed images, can produce large amounts of noise. even more so after recovery of the image... but it's already been said above! ^


Niraj Popat | www.nirajpopat.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cr4zYH3aD
Goldmember
1,024 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 03, 2007 18:17 |  #26

Oh THAT noise. Thats "normal" noise I guess. It happens to me too with my XTi on dark surface. I guess that this has to do with the fact that the light just hits the shadow and bring up the noise in that area.


Canon EOS 7D | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fWord
Goldmember
Avatar
2,637 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Nov 04, 2007 06:24 as a reply to  @ Cr4zYH3aD's post |  #27

That's not an excessive amount of noise, considering the vast majority of it is appearing in the shadow areas of your photo, which is what I'd expect anyway. There's relatively little chrominance noise there, which is a good thing.

There's often a recommendation to expose to the right when photographing...this means that if you shoot RAW, photograph a scene such that the tones are as far to the right of the histogram as possible without blowing the highlights (ie. pushing the chart too far to the right), and then correcting the exposure back in the RAW processing stage. This maximizes the sound/ noise ratio, hence giving you more good information and less 'bad' information (noise).


LightWorks Portfolio (external link)
Night Photography Tutorial: Basics & Minutiae (external link)
Gear List (Past & Present)
The Art of Composition IS the Art of Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Nov 04, 2007 08:33 |  #28

Underexposure causes really bad noise.

ISO 200-6400 20D Tests

Some Volley Ball Tournament Tests


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cy88
Senior Member
Avatar
818 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
     
Nov 04, 2007 13:52 |  #29

Have you tried using the DPP software that came with your camera? I usually just use that and most of the time it's sufficient.


6D | 5D2 | 24L II | 35L | 85L II | 100L | Panasonic GX7 | Olympus 12/2.0 | Panasonic 20/1.7
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,276 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
too much noise in my pictures
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2853 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.