 | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
| POLL: "Rate this photo" |
 This photo sucks! | 1 0.8% |
| Its ok... | 43 36.1% |
| good photo. | 51 42.9% |
| I like it a lot. | 21 17.6% |
| AWESOME! | 3 2.5% |
microman23 Senior Member 728 posts Joined Sep 2007 More info | Nov 03, 2007 20:20 | #1  Permanent ban
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer  51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Nov 03, 2007 20:49 | #2 I think it's good. Better lighting of the couple could've made it very good. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 03, 2007 20:50 | #3 Permanent bantim wrote in post #4247171  I think it's good. Better lighting of the couple could've made it very good. How do you mean, better lighting?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amonline Goldmember  3,558 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 More info | Nov 03, 2007 20:55 | #4 I'd bump the saturation... but I also would have underexposed the ambient more and warmed it up in RAW. I don't really care for the crop and camera height. The horizon should have been at her shoulders instead of his IMO. A slight tilt might turn it around too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tenoverthenose Senior Member 822 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Yosemite, Ca More info | Nov 03, 2007 21:21 | #5 microman23 wrote in post #4247174 How do you mean, better lighting? IMO, off camera flash would have helped this photo by giving the couple more depth. Maybe it might work to see the couple head to toe to give the scene more context - maybe not. www.patrickpike.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wizard13 Goldmember  1,169 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2006 Location: Western NY More info | Nov 03, 2007 21:29 | #6 Trying to bump the saturation as already suggested to try and bring as much color out of the background as possible may help to improve this already good shot. Photography = a constant learning process
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SHULTSIE!!! "Stonehenge wasn't too impressive"  3,964 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2006 Location: DC More info | Nov 03, 2007 21:37 | #7 |
newbie_photog Senior Member 362 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Oregon More info | Nov 03, 2007 23:19 | #8 I agree with the above posts, I think it is deffinatly workable after a little PP. I did a quick edit if its ok I'll post it here with what I did to it. 20d, 10d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 04, 2007 00:12 | #9 Permanent banSure... feel free to giver er a try!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sl3966 Member  232 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Annapolis, MD More info | Just bumped the saturation in the clouds. His face went a little ruddy on me but this literally took about 5 seconds to bump up the sat and clone the bird I was not paying attention to the details. I actually like the blue. Good photo.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paul33 Senior Member  380 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2002 Location: Peterborough, UK More info | Nov 04, 2007 05:46 | #11 |
chestercopperpot Senior Member 996 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Nov 04, 2007 06:50 | #12 the second edit looks way oversaturated to me. perhaps it could use a touch more saturation, but not that much. also, the girl's neck looks a little strained. i thought the lighting on the couple looked right, just the background could be a touch darker. otherwise i think its pretty good. Michael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trantz Member 120 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Detroit, Windsor, Kitchener or Toronto, sometimes all in the same day More info | Nov 04, 2007 07:26 | #13 I think that photo looks amazing, and the client would be EXTREMELY impressed. troy shantz is trantz photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
simon_says Senior Member 306 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Nov 04, 2007 10:22 | #14 tenoverthenose wrote in post #4247319 IMO, off camera flash would have helped this photo by giving the couple more depth.... Regardless, its a good shot! I agree with both statements.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
buddy4344 OM System Ambassador  More info | Nov 04, 2007 10:31 | #15 comments above are good, but my biggest problem is that the heads intersect the horizon. I think a slightly different angle would create less conflict with the background. Buddy4344
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2443 guests, 105 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
You seem to value the truth... this is what I see. Hope that helps.