Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 04 Nov 2007 (Sunday) 07:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

My 1st E session

 
photojag
Senior Member
Avatar
793 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
     
Nov 04, 2007 07:54 |  #1

Hey to all.. havent been on in awhile and would love some feedback on these. Dont hold back..im not sensative.. lol

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v429/vtecjag/Yoakley/IMG_0705.jpg
IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v429/vtecjag/Yoakley/LomoMediumVignette2.jpg
IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v429/vtecjag/Yoakley/IMG_0713.jpg
IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v429/vtecjag/Yoakley/IMG_0757.jpg
IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v429/vtecjag/Yoakley/IMG_0664copy.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JJacula
Goldmember
1,791 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Nov 04, 2007 09:11 |  #2

1. Selective colouring is evil 99% of the time. This is one of those times. Would probably be cute as regular coloured, or straight b&w.
2. Underexposed.
3. Too busy. What is it supposed to be a photo of? The sign on the door and the little kid between their bodies kind of ruins it.
4. Underexposed, would like to see them more towards the upper left of the picture with a more effective use of space to the right. They also look very flat - play with your curves a little to make them pop.
5. Out of focus, or did you add one of those lame glamour effects? I'm not a fan of the glamour effect. Either way, I don't know why anyone would want an out of focus picture.

Mostly what I see is a lot of Photoshop effects. Sometimes a little, tiny tiny tiny bit of Photoshop goes a long way. If you're trying to use Photoshop to make crappy pictures look decent, then you need to work more on your photography and less on your photoshopping.


http://www.jenniferjac​ula.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tony ­ fanning
Senior Member
Avatar
834 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Colwyn Bay,North Wales, UK
     
Nov 04, 2007 10:17 |  #3

JJacula wrote in post #4249721 (external link)
Mostly what I see is a lot of Photoshop effects. Sometimes a little, tiny tiny tiny bit of Photoshop goes a long way. If you're trying to use Photoshop to make crappy pictures look decent, then you need to work more on your photography and less on your photoshopping.

Someone got out of bed the wrong side today. Talk about harsh! I`m sure you could have worded this a bit kinder.
I too think they are under exposed, but NOT crappy.


Regards, Tony
Gear list
Better flash technique (external link)

conwy wedding photographer (external link)
north wales wedding photograper (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
     
Nov 04, 2007 10:21 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

He asked for honest critique and got it. This is why I refrain from commenting on other's photos in this forum.



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
newbie_photog
Senior Member
362 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Oregon
     
Nov 04, 2007 14:35 |  #5

I agree with JJacula on some points,

1. not a fan of the selective coloring here
2. I like the contrast between the dull colored wall and the couple but its a little dark and I'm not really feeling a close connection between the couple and there is way too much head room.
3. I don't like how you cut the woman off, this may be better more centered so you can see both people, and maybe see their heads too.
4. A bit orange and I think could have used a shallower depth of fied I find the pealing paint an interesting texture but distracting.
5. A good composition but again appears a bit orange and looks OOF if its a PP effect get rid of it. I looks like a mistake.


20d, 10d
Tamron 28-75 F2.8, Canon 50mm F1.8 II
550EX 540EZ, 2 AB 400

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,393 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
My 1st E session
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
558 guests, 148 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.