List the lenses you had but sold/traded off

17-40 and 85 1.8

Some pentax & nikkor lenses from my film slrs

canon lenses I've sold are:
EF-S 18-55 kit lens
EF 75-300
EF 24-105L (and bought another a month later)

i sold the 10-22 and kick myself in the ass for it every time I go out to shoot...I think I will buy another copy sometime.

sold 70-200/4L non IS
for 70-200/2.8L IS

Sold:
17-40 f4L
70-200 f4L
50 f1.8 MkII
28-105 f3.5-4.5 MkII (sold this a few years back)

Wow, ok here is a small laundry list:

Canon 5D--I traded up for the 1DsII
Canon 1DMkIIN--I saved money by buying a used 1DII
Digital Rebel XT--I moved up to the 5D above

Peleng 8mm Fisheye--Too wide for my full frame. I kept the 15mm FE
Sigma 12-24 4.5/5.6 EX HSM--I went for the 16-35 mkI on a full frame
Canon EF 16-35L 2.8 Mk I--Decided I wanted the markII
Sigma 17-70 2.8/4.5--XT Walk around--I went FF

Canon EF 80-200[COLOR=red][COLOR=blac​k]L 2.8 "Magic Drainpipe" --I upgraded to the 7-2 2.8 IS
Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 IS--I wanted to try the Sigma 120-300 2.8
Canon [COLOR=red][COLOR=blac​k]EF 100-400L 4.5-5.6 IS--This copy was a little too soft for my taste
Canon EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6--Sold, and got what I could
Canon EF 50 1.8--Gifted away
Canon EF 50 1.4--Sold and reacquired
Canon EF 85 1.8--Went with the 100 2.0 instead
Canon EF 100 2.8 Macro--Didn't do macro much.
Canon EF 135L 2.0 (I hope to reacquire this one someday)
Canon EF 300L 2.8 IS (Traded up for the 500L, but I hope to reacquire this one someday)

50mm 1.8 = should have gotten the 1.4 from the start, lesson learned.
10-22mm = went full frame for my wide angle needs.

I don't regret getting rid of the 10-22 for one second. I couldn't stand the distortion at the widest end. Granted it was pretty nice at 15mm, but on a 40D it just wasn't wide enough. I like my 17-40L much more even if in the end it isn't much better about distortion. It's just much more versatile on a 5D than a 10-22 on a 40D. Besides I bought the 10-22 used and made $150 when I sold it.

Canon...

300F4IS
100 Macro
24-70L
30mm Sigma

Nikon...

17-55
10-20 Sigma
11-16 Tokina
12-24 Tokina
30mm Sigma
50mm 1.8
50mm 1.4
85mm 1.8
85mm 1.4
180 2.8
70-300VR
50-150 Sigma
90 Tamron
70-200VR
35mm F2
35-70 F2.8
75-150E AIS
50-135 F3.5 AIS
105 2.5 AI
28 F2 AId
24 F2.8 AIS
70-210F4
70-210D
28-105
18-200VR
18-55
18-55VR
55-200VR
105VR
60AFS micro
60 micro

Probably a few I missed.
Never really realized it until now, but I think I've got a serious problem.

Only two,
Tokina 17mm f/3.5
Canon 20-35mm f/3.5-4.5

JAcosta wrote in post #4255911
Ive had and (miss) these lenses:

Sigma 30mm f/1.4
Canon EF 70-200 f4/L IS
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
Canon EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-45
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8

Thinking about Selling/Trading my 16-35 f/2.8L to get a 135 f/2L

Ill NEVER part with my 24-70 f/2.8L. Its literally the perfect lens for me.

yet it's no longer in your sig

Tamron 18-200 XR DiII Aspherical macro
Canon EF-S 18-55 (400D kitlens)
Canon EF-S 55-250 IS
Canon EF 50 1.8
Canon EF 17-40 L

18-55 Non IS
55-250 Non IS
50 1.8

**canon**
17-85IS
18-55IS x2
100 macro
70-200 f4L

**sigma**
18-200 OS
70-300 macro
180 macro
30 f/1.4

**tokina**
100mm macro

McQueen278 wrote in post #6375795
I don't regret getting rid of the 10-22 for one second. I couldn't stand the distortion at the widest end. Granted it was pretty nice at 15mm, but on a 40D it just wasn't wide enough. I like my 17-40L much more even if in the end it isn't much better about distortion. It's just much more versatile on a 5D than a 10-22 on a 40D. Besides I bought the 10-22 used and made $150 when I sold it.

You couldn't stand the distortion at the widest end, yet you prefer the distortion of the 17-40, even though it's more apparent and more complex?

ooook

The Canon 10-22mm has the least distortion at it's widest FOV compared to any other UWA at the same FOV that I'm aware of.

since i bought into canon in 1997...

0 lenses sold/traded
1 given away with old EOS film body to family member: EOS 500 + 35-80mm kit lens