Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 05 Nov 2007 (Monday) 09:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

XTi - red eye question

 
SCUser
Member
86 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: South Carolina and Massachusetts USA
     
Nov 05, 2007 09:13 |  #1

Hi, I am new to this forum and new to Photography. I have a delemma/question for you all:

My new XTi seems to be taking a lot of pictures where the subjects have serious red-eye. I am shooting in the Basic Modes (Full Auto and Portrait) as I am relatively new to SLR photography.

This is extremely frustrating as I take a lot of Dog photos and the Red-Eye Correction in my PS Elements does not work on the green canine version of Red Eye. Also, I am spending a lot of time correcting photos of birthday parties and the like where Elements isn't picking up all of the red eyes.

Does anyone here have any suggestions.

Today is the last day I can return it, under the Costco 90 day guarentee, if I need to.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Mary


Rebel XTi/400D, Rebel XT/350D,Rebel T2 (film)
Kit Lens' w/ Macro attachments +1,+2,+4
Quantaray 70-300 Tele-Macro
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
Canon Speedlite 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SCUser
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
86 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: South Carolina and Massachusetts USA
     
Nov 05, 2007 10:19 |  #2

1000arms wrote in post #4256371 (external link)
Use your manual to check that red-eye reduction is on.

Triple Checked - Most def. on!


Rebel XTi/400D, Rebel XT/350D,Rebel T2 (film)
Kit Lens' w/ Macro attachments +1,+2,+4
Quantaray 70-300 Tele-Macro
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
Canon Speedlite 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PBest78
Member
Avatar
165 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
     
Nov 05, 2007 10:20 as a reply to  @ SCUser's post |  #3

Stop using the built in flash


Peter
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Nov 05, 2007 10:22 |  #4

Or clone it out in PP.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Nov 05, 2007 10:24 |  #5

The only real way to eliminate redeye is to move the light source further from the lens. This is the achille's heel of the built-in flash.

Using a hotshoe-mounted flash unit will get you a little lattitude, though often it's still not enough to solve the problem. But with one of those flash units you can bounce the flash indoors which generally does the trick.

Obviously, flash units come at a cost, but I don't know of any other way to solve the problem other than taking your subjects outdoors.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Nov 05, 2007 10:55 |  #6

Curtis N wrote in post #4256668 (external link)
The only real way to eliminate redeye is to move the light source further from the lens. This is the achille's heel of the built-in flash.

Using a hotshoe-mounted flash unit will get you a little lattitude, though often it's still not enough to solve the problem. But with one of those flash units you can bounce the flash indoors which generally does the trick.

Obviously, flash units come at a cost, but I don't know of any other way to solve the problem other than taking your subjects outdoors.

Listen to Curtis. Red Eye has been the bane of beginning photographers for years. The on-camera fixes (pre-flash, strobing flash, etc.) are marginal solutions as best. The only way to effectively solve this problem is to get the flash off the camera or away from the lens axis, or to not use flash at all.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elysium
"full of stupid banter"
Avatar
11,619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France
     
Nov 05, 2007 11:00 |  #7

Mark_Cohran wrote in post #4256869 (external link)
Listen to Curtis. Red Eye has been the bane of beginning photographers for years. The on-camera fixes (pre-flash, strobing flash, etc.) are marginal solutions as best. The only way to effectively solve this problem is to get the flash off the camera or away from the lens axis.

Mark

Dont bother shooting in Full Auto since you will never get the full potential of your camera. It turns out to be a very expensive point and shoot camera.

Red eye on pets is hard. Few ways to correct this.

1. Shoot in a custom mode such as Av which does not automatically activate flash
2. Increase the ISO which means you should not really need the flash
3. Buy a external flash which you can angle towards the ceiling which will give you some decent fill flash
4. Shoot as you do and use the software provided to remove redeye.

The 400D is not the best body out there but being a Canon entry level DSLR, it is simple enough to learn on and can provide some fantastic photos if you are willing to try a few things and not use the dreaded "Green Box" mode.


Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,120 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
XTi - red eye question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2832 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.