Banana Tiger wrote in post #4276003
Just playing around with my colleagues 24-105 which I am thinking of getting. I've noticed on his 5d that from the range of 70-105, it doesn't seem to "zoom " that much. It was the whole reason I wanted to choose the 24-105 over the 24-70. I'll be using mine on a 40d. For those who have the 24-105 on a crop, do you find the extra reach substantial?
Yes, I do. From 70-105 on a crop you have a similar AoV difference as 112-168 on FF, so this is substantial. Very similar difference in zoom range as from 35 to 55, 100 to 150, etc.
Another thing to consider is what you will be using this lens for, and whether you need F/2.8, or IS.
From my viewpoint, a 24-105 is a variable 50 mm lens, as 50 mm is the geometrical midpoint of this zoom. The geometrical midpoint of the 24-70 is 41 mm. 50 mm essentially is a great FL for portraits on a crop, while 41 mm is too short for that. So, in my view of the world, the 24-105 is an ideal portrait zoom. F/4 generally is not a problem for portraiture, because even at F/4 you still struggle to get everuthing from the tip of the nose to the cheeks inclusive within DoF.
HTH, kind regards, Wim