Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 08 Nov 2007 (Thursday) 14:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Some help and advice please.

 
TekHouse
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Earth
     
Nov 08, 2007 14:52 |  #1

OK..

The scenario is:

1 New 40D bought with the kit lens (which seems like it will stay in my camera case from now on....because: But after coming here and lurking about, I went out and purchased these:

17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM
and
Tokina AT-X 100mm f/2.8 Macro

Anyway, I have not had the opportunity to really use the macro yet, but tonight I went out and about and took a few shots with the 17-55.

This is one shot that to me looks fine, but, putting composition aside as I was really testing low light and how clear this lens is...what can i do to improve this:

IMAGE: http://www.tekmil.com/canon/40D_test_1.jpg

or...should I be happy with this?

The data for this shot (this is a reduced jpeg) :

File name
IMG_0675.CR2
Camera Model Name
Canon EOS 40D
Firmware
Firmware Version 1.0.3
Shooting Date/Time
11/8/2007 17:44:58
Tv(Shutter Speed)
0.3Sec.
Av(Aperture Value)
F4.5
Metering Modes
Evaluative metering
Exposure Compensation
+1
ISO Speed
640
Lens
EF-S17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM
Focal Length
42.0 mm
Image size
3888 x 2592
Image Quality
RAW
Flash
Off
White Balance
Auto
AF mode
AI focus AF
Picture Style
Standard
Parameters
Tone Curve : Standard
Sharpness level : -
Pattern Sharpness : -
Contrast : 0
Sharpness : 7
Color saturation : 0
Color tone : 0
Highlight tone priority : No
Color matrix
-
Color Space
sRGB
File Size
13067 KB
Dust Delete Data
No
Drive Mode
Single-frame shooting


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goforphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,067 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Virginia
     
Nov 08, 2007 19:26 |  #2

increase shutter speed to 0.2 to reduce the glare from the street lights and it would be perfect. Nice lens.


Just another shutterbug.
I am not a photographer, I'm an image capture technician.
Canon 40D - 70-200L f4, 28-135 IS, Nifty Fifty, 70-300 macro, 18-55 420EX Sunpak 266d

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Nov 08, 2007 19:44 |  #3

I agree with GFP on the shutter speed.. also, this almost looks too sharp.. did you run this through the USM filter? The DOF is bugging me.. maybe a smaller aperture?

Very clear shot though, I'm always impressed with the 40D.. I'm jealous :)


[ www (external link)ยท flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Nov 08, 2007 21:14 |  #4

You have to ask yourself, "was the scene really this bright when I was looking at it?"

If you decide that it was not, then you might want to try processing it for a lower key.

I think that even with links to other hosts, the image files should be kept smaller out of consideration for dial-up members. Also, the rule of 800 pixels maximum in the longest dimension should be respected in order to keep from having to scroll to see the whole image. Please see the sticky at the head of this forum for posting rules!

Welcome to the POTN!


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TekHouse
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Earth
     
Nov 09, 2007 01:34 |  #5

Yeah good call..

*sorry for exceeding the limit, I will remember next time..Its the 'problem' of using a 1680X1050 resolution! :)

All of you..

First its shot like this from the camera. I did not do anything to it other than reduce its size for uploading to my server.

It was 'darker' on the street then this. I was actually really amazed once the shot was taken to see how bright it was and as you can see I used no flash. That lens sure captures some light!

I'm going to try again, as I was looking for a more realistic shot in terms of light.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TTk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,518 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Langtoft. England.
     
Nov 09, 2007 03:22 |  #6

I like this Town shot alot don't think you should change anything, but do change the size of your uploaded photos.
Regards..


Terry.:cool:
http://www.terrykirton.co/ (external link)
http://www.ttkphotogra​phy.com/ (external link)
http://www.langtoftpho​tography.com/ (external link)

 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TekHouse
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Earth
     
Nov 09, 2007 05:45 |  #7

OK I changed the size. Sorry.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Nov 09, 2007 10:30 |  #8

TekHouse wrote in post #4282134 (external link)
Yeah good call..

*sorry for exceeding the limit, I will remember next time..Its the 'problem' of using a 1680X1050 resolution! :)

On the other hand, how lucky you are to have such a large monitor that will support such a high screen resolution:D

All of you..

First its shot like this from the camera. I did not do anything to it other than reduce its size for uploading to my server.

It was 'darker' on the street then this. I was actually really amazed once the shot was taken to see how bright it was and as you can see I used no flash. That lens sure captures some light!

The resulting exposure is therefore the result of the very nature of auto-exposure. It tries to bring the overall scene to an average level of 18% middle gray - whether that is appropriate or not. In this case you explicitly set it up for a +1 Exposure Correction.

(I am presuming here that you used an exposure mode that more or less averages out the entire scene, and also assuming that you used one of the modes that follow conventional auto-exposure algrorithms. I'm confused, myself, about "Evaluative" metering.)

I'm going to try again, as I was looking for a more realistic shot in terms of light.

Then you are more or less forced into an appreciation of the Zone System, which may require you to put in about -1 f-stop of Exposure correction. Whatever you do it is going to be adversely affected by those street lights, so long as they are included in the frame. The best thing to do is bracket around the best guess and then follow the precept of Henri Cartier-Bresson's "The Decisive Moment" - in other words, decide which one you like from the proof sheet :lol:


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,671 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Some help and advice please.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1050 guests, 108 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.