Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 09 Nov 2007 (Friday) 12:27
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which two bodies for stage/people shooting? (see full Q below, select 2 only pls!)"
30D
5
3.6%
40D
30
21.4%
5D
64
45.7%
1D Mk2N
4
2.9%
1D Mk2
4
2.9%
1D Mk3
33
23.6%

76 voters, 140 votes given (any choice choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

One-Two punch lowlight/performance/people shooting bodies for "serious" amateurs

 
datadump
Goldmember
Avatar
1,932 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 09, 2007 12:27 |  #1

If you were into shooting stage performance (low light) and also people portraits, and you were able to grab any two bodies THAT EXIST TODAY in market, which two would you grab given that you are doing this as a hobby (shooting 2-3 times a month at clubs/venues, once/twice at year making a modest amount of money for it, the rest are shooting people around town and family) ?

Thanks for your time! Cheers...


datadump

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Riff ­ Raff
Goldmember
Avatar
1,111 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
     
Nov 09, 2007 12:30 |  #2

5D and either 40D or XTi. My XTi works quite well at ISO 800 for low-light theatre work. I'm really hoping to pick up the 5D replacement next year though.


Shawn McHorse - Shawn.McHorse.com (external link) / AustinRocky.org (external link)
DSLR: 5D Mark III Compact: S100 Flash: 580EX II Bag: Tamrac Rally 5
Lenses: 16-35mm f/2.8L II, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS,
50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tsaraleksi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,653 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA
     
Nov 09, 2007 12:38 |  #3

If cost is no object then go with the 5D and the 1Dm3.


--Alex Editorial Portfolio (external link)
|| Elan 7ne+BG ||5D mk. II ||1D mk. II N || EF 17-40 F4L ||EF 24-70 F2.8L||EF 35 1.4L || EF 85 1.2L ||EF 70-200 2.8L|| EF 300 4L IS[on loan]| |Speedlite 580EX || Nikon Coolscan IV ED||

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IB///M
Member
Avatar
227 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Nov 09, 2007 12:40 |  #4

tsaraleksi wrote in post #4284541 (external link)
If cost is no object then go with the 5D and the 1Dm3.

same here. but if you want to save some money, 40D will do just fine


5D mark II
17-40 f/4 L | 35 f/1.4 L | 70-200 f/2.8 IS L | 400 f/5.6 L | Kenko 1.4x | 580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
t60p
Senior Member
450 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Jul 2006
     
Nov 09, 2007 14:04 |  #5

What is your current setup?

Before upgrading to the "best" camera bodies, I'd take a serious look at my lenses. Personally, I'd rather have top glass before I had top bodies, especially since you said that you are "doing this as a hobby mostly but once/twice a year for a modest amount of money."

If you don't already have top glass, I'd recommend you invest your money in fast primes (or zooms) and get yourself two 400D bodies with battery grips.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GaryPhoto
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
13 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 09, 2007 14:08 |  #6

I would agree with t60p. I would look at the glass before the body. Then again, that depends on the size of the prints you want produced.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-Gary-
Camera: 5D,30D,20D Lenses: EF 70-200 4L | EF 24-70 2.8L | EF 17-40 4L | EF 100 2.8 Macro | EF 28 - 105, etc

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
datadump
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,932 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 09, 2007 15:52 |  #7

I currently shoot with a 30d

But I would like a second body.

Glasswise, my main primes are
sigma 30 1.4
Canon 50 1.4
Canon 85 1.8
Canon 135mm f2 (about to buy)

I don't use my zooms much but when I do:
70-200f4 IS
17-55 f2.8 IS


datadump

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Nov 09, 2007 15:58 |  #8

After glass - and I would get good low-light glass first - I'd get a 5D for portraits and a 40D for stage (the extra reach would come in handy). The 1D series is overkill for stage and portraits if that's all their going to be used for.

Mra


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rokkorfan
Senior Member
Avatar
256 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia
     
Nov 09, 2007 16:01 |  #9

Best low light is 1D3 - critically good to 3200. Second best is 5D - critically good to 1600. All the rest start to have noise that requires work after 800.


Professional wedding photographer based in Coffs Harbour, NSW Australia (external link)
Links: Website  (external link)| Blog (external link) | How to photograph a wedding (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave ­ kadolph
"Fix the cigarette lighter"
Avatar
6,140 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Mar 2007
Location: West Michigan--166.33 miles to the Cook County courthouse
     
Nov 09, 2007 16:15 as a reply to  @ Rokkorfan's post |  #10

Mk3 and ISO 3200 is a given--If money is no object.

Then 5D or 40D--Depends on your lens lineup and distance from the stage.


Middle age is when you can finally afford the things that a young man could truly enjoy.
Tools of the trade

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
datadump
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,932 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 09, 2007 16:34 |  #11

Mark_Cohran wrote in post #4285500 (external link)
After glass - and I would get good low-light glass first - I'd get a 5D for portraits and a 40D for stage (the extra reach would come in handy). The 1D series is overkill for stage and portraits if that's all their going to be used for.

Mra

1D - yeah i am finding it hard to decide -- mk3 is pretty much outta the question. i really like the 1dmk2n but like you said, i'm not sure if it is gonna be overkill for what i do.. i just love the multi spot and AF point spot metering in the pro bodies:)

i listed my lens lineup just above your post... though off topic, would u recommend any other glass? i am really fine with the setup i have for glass thus far... hence i was starting to look for bodies that does high iso well. seems like 5D is the king still but i really thought the 1dm2n isnt much different other than less noisereduction in-camera...


datadump

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
freaking102
Senior Member
412 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Nov 09, 2007 16:34 |  #12

datadump wrote in post #4284489 (external link)
If you were into shooting stage performance (low light) and also people portraits, and you were able to grab any two bodies THAT EXIST TODAY in market, which two would you grab given that you are doing this as a hobby mostly but once/twice a year for a modest amount of money?

Thanks for your time! Cheers...

depends on which bodies have a lens attached. would be silly to grab the body if no lens, or wrong lens. and which body is new or used. criminy, you need to be more specific about choices.
hobby once or twice a year? under those conditions, you would be foolish to spend thousands of $$ for a once a year night at the club.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
datadump
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,932 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 09, 2007 16:38 |  #13

freaking102 wrote in post #4285711 (external link)
depends on which bodies have a lens attached. would be silly to grab the body if no lens, or wrong lens. and which body is new or used. criminy, you need to be more specific about choices.
hobby once or twice a year? under those conditions, you would be foolish to spend thousands of $$ for a once a year night at the club.

oh.. misunderstanding.. i shoot at clubs/venues as a hobby 3 times a month as a hobby. the rest is shooting people. i dont often make any money but once in a while, yeah..

my lens are listed in post #7 above:)


datadump

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
narlus
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,671 posts
Likes: 85
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Andover, MA
     
Nov 09, 2007 18:47 |  #14

tsaraleksi wrote in post #4284541 (external link)
If cost is no object then go with the 5D and the 1Dm3.


absolutely.

the 5D is an obvious choice for one body, and who would select a 30D or 40D over a 1mkIII?


www.tinnitus-photography.com (external link)
Facebook link (external link)

gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Riff ­ Raff
Goldmember
Avatar
1,111 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
     
Nov 09, 2007 18:52 as a reply to  @ narlus's post |  #15

Other than someone lacking the extra $3k, that is...


Shawn McHorse - Shawn.McHorse.com (external link) / AustinRocky.org (external link)
DSLR: 5D Mark III Compact: S100 Flash: 580EX II Bag: Tamrac Rally 5
Lenses: 16-35mm f/2.8L II, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS,
50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,004 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
One-Two punch lowlight/performance/people shooting bodies for "serious" amateurs
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2879 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.