Forgive the title it was taken 7 November! Here is a piggyback shot of the Comet with the 17-200 F/4L at 200mm. 25 frames stacked. Total exposure is 26 minutes at f/4 ISO 200. Pretty interesting watching this Comet change from day to day.
RHardman Goldmember 1,514 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2005 Location: 29 Palms, Ca. More info | Nov 11, 2007 01:22 | #1 Forgive the title it was taken 7 November! Here is a piggyback shot of the Comet with the 17-200 F/4L at 200mm. 25 frames stacked. Total exposure is 26 minutes at f/4 ISO 200. Pretty interesting watching this Comet change from day to day. "Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cfpackerfan I love my tail! 51,606 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2006 Location: Beautiful Southern Utah Relevant posts: 813 More info | Nov 12, 2007 00:18 | #2 That is so cool! 25 images? WOW. Cat -the femine feline with the namby arms. Loquacious, but not to a fault.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Adrena1in Goldmember 1,703 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK. More info | If that's at 200mm then this comet must be pretty big I guess...viewable with the naked eye as just a star I guess? Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2007 09:47 | #4 Outstanding image Rick. Very nicely composed. I photographed it myself on Saturday night. Really a beautiful site. What were you piggy-backed on for this? Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2007 12:55 | #5 Adrena1in - It was shot at 200mm but when I stacked it I used a 2x Drizzle command which effectively doubles the image output. I used 200 ISO since it is a bright target and I wanted to keep the noise levels down. As for dark frames I made 5 dark frames to create a master dark frame which was applied to each seperate image. "Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2007 15:44 | #6 Wow, you've been at this a lot longer than me. The 2080 seems to hold well for piggy back work. I spend about an hour, sometimes more drift aligning and doing periodic error correction with my G-11. I don't autoguide so the time spent drift aligning really pays off. At 407mm, I'm able to get between 3.5 and 6.5 minute exposures here lately. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KraigC Goldmember 2,227 posts Joined Sep 2005 More info | Nov 12, 2007 16:00 | #7 R Hardman wrote in post #4293713 Forgive the title it was taken 7 November! Here is a piggyback shot of the Comet with the 17-200 F/4L at 200mm. 25 frames stacked. Total exposure is 26 minutes at f/4 ISO 200. Pretty interesting watching this Comet change from day to day. That's alot of work
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2007 17:54 | #8 Nighthound - Used DeepSkyStacker for this image. I also use Registax. Seem they both work well for being free! A I do spend quite a bit of time drift aligning. Seems I can never get it perfect! "Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Adrena1in Goldmember 1,703 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK. More info | Nov 14, 2007 09:38 | #9 R Hardman wrote in post #4303749 Used DeepSkyStacker for this image. I also use Registax. Glad to hear that someone who is producing such quality images uses DeepSkyStacker...that's what I use. Prefer it to Registax though, which I could never get good results from. Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
frumpy708 Mostly Lurking 14 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia More info | Nov 14, 2007 11:57 | #10 R Hardman,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 16, 2007 22:16 | #11 frumpy708 wrote in post #4314840 R Hardman, What magnification lense are you using on your scope. I have an Orion 8" Dob with tons of lenses for it. I currently am in the search for a mounting brackets for it and am going ot start taking night photos soon with my XTi. I have a 28-135 lense for my XTi that I think will work fine for this feature but mainly am woried about the mounting bracket and what magnification lense you use. I currently have 10 different lenses with different magnifications for my Dob so I am sure I will have to just play around with what I am trying to take pictures of to get results. I have only two currently for the scope. A 7mm and a 20mm which gives me a magnification factor of 290 and 100 respectively. I currently can only piggyback using my regular camera lenses since the primary and secondary mirrors have deteriorated and need replaced. It's ok for bright object viewing but not usable for prime focus work. Sorry for the delay in the response but my computers power supply failed and I was down for a few days until I replace it. "Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 880 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||