Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
Thread started 11 Nov 2007 (Sunday) 01:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Comet 17P/Holmes - 7 Oct

 
R ­ Hardman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
Location: 29 Palms, Ca.
     
Nov 11, 2007 01:22 |  #1

Forgive the title it was taken 7 November! Here is a piggyback shot of the Comet with the 17-200 F/4L at 200mm. 25 frames stacked. Total exposure is 26 minutes at f/4 ISO 200. Pretty interesting watching this Comet change from day to day.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


"Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
EOS 7D, EOS 350D, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit)
Rick's Digital Desert (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cfpackerfan
I love my tail!
Avatar
51,606 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Beautiful Southern Utah Relevant posts: 813
     
Nov 12, 2007 00:18 |  #2

That is so cool! 25 images? WOW.


Cat -the femine feline with the namby arms. Loquacious, but not to a fault.
*Best post ever*  (external link)*Inspirations Photography* (external link) *Starfish Journal* (external link) *H.A.R.T.* (external link) <--clickety click!
"Be the change you wish to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adrena1in
Goldmember
1,703 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK.
     
Nov 12, 2007 09:30 as a reply to  @ cfpackerfan's post |  #3

If that's at 200mm then this comet must be pretty big I guess...viewable with the naked eye as just a star I guess?

I'm guessing your exposures were 1-minute each, with a 1-minute dark frame? But only ISO 200? Why not higher? (Sorry, I'm still learning about astrophotography...sti​ll don't really know why some situations need lower ISOs and some higher. I tend to leave mine on ISO1600 to max out the light sensitivity, thus reducing the time I need to leave the shutter open.)


Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Nov 12, 2007 09:47 |  #4

Outstanding image Rick. Very nicely composed. I photographed it myself on Saturday night. Really a beautiful site. What were you piggy-backed on for this?

NH


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R ­ Hardman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
Location: 29 Palms, Ca.
     
Nov 12, 2007 12:55 |  #5

Adrena1in - It was shot at 200mm but when I stacked it I used a 2x Drizzle command which effectively doubles the image output. I used 200 ISO since it is a bright target and I wanted to keep the noise levels down. As for dark frames I made 5 dark frames to create a master dark frame which was applied to each seperate image.

Nighthound - Thanks. I use a Meade 2080 LX3 (8") that I had since 1987. It's not a GOTO scope so I spend some time aligning it prior to taking the first image. I have to replace the optics since they have deteriorated over time. Meade's factory is a few hours from here and they said they would replace the optics with new glass so I'm saving up my pennies. I want to get into prime focus again.


"Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
EOS 7D, EOS 350D, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit)
Rick's Digital Desert (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Nov 12, 2007 15:44 |  #6

Wow, you've been at this a lot longer than me. The 2080 seems to hold well for piggy back work. I spend about an hour, sometimes more drift aligning and doing periodic error correction with my G-11. I don't autoguide so the time spent drift aligning really pays off. At 407mm, I'm able to get between 3.5 and 6.5 minute exposures here lately.

What stacking software are you using?

NH


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kraig ­ C
Goldmember
Avatar
2,227 posts
Joined Sep 2005
     
Nov 12, 2007 16:00 |  #7

R Hardman wrote in post #4293713 (external link)
Forgive the title it was taken 7 November! Here is a piggyback shot of the Comet with the 17-200 F/4L at 200mm. 25 frames stacked. Total exposure is 26 minutes at f/4 ISO 200. Pretty interesting watching this Comet change from day to day.

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by R Hardman in
./showthread.php?p=429​3713&i=i30920639
forum: Wildlife

That's alot of work ;) Do you get similar results showing in the coma while adjusting the gama/levels in the finished stack? little bit of a rooster tail like v coming off what apears to be the nucleous.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R ­ Hardman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
Location: 29 Palms, Ca.
     
Nov 12, 2007 17:54 |  #8

Nighthound - Used DeepSkyStacker for this image. I also use Registax. Seem they both work well for being free! A I do spend quite a bit of time drift aligning. Seems I can never get it perfect!

Kraig - The original image does show a very faint halo and tail.


"Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
EOS 7D, EOS 350D, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit)
Rick's Digital Desert (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adrena1in
Goldmember
1,703 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK.
     
Nov 14, 2007 09:38 |  #9

R Hardman wrote in post #4303749 (external link)
Used DeepSkyStacker for this image. I also use Registax.

Glad to hear that someone who is producing such quality images uses DeepSkyStacker...that'​s what I use. Prefer it to Registax though, which I could never get good results from.


Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frumpy708
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
14 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
     
Nov 14, 2007 11:57 |  #10

R Hardman,
What magnification lense are you using on your scope. I have an Orion 8" Dob with tons of lenses for it. I currently am in the search for a mounting brackets for it and am going ot start taking night photos soon with my XTi. I have a 28-135 lense for my XTi that I think will work fine for this feature but mainly am woried about the mounting bracket and what magnification lense you use. I currently have 10 different lenses with different magnifications for my Dob so I am sure I will have to just play around with what I am trying to take pictures of to get results.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R ­ Hardman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
Location: 29 Palms, Ca.
     
Nov 16, 2007 22:16 |  #11

frumpy708 wrote in post #4314840 (external link)
R Hardman,
What magnification lense are you using on your scope. I have an Orion 8" Dob with tons of lenses for it. I currently am in the search for a mounting brackets for it and am going ot start taking night photos soon with my XTi. I have a 28-135 lense for my XTi that I think will work fine for this feature but mainly am woried about the mounting bracket and what magnification lense you use. I currently have 10 different lenses with different magnifications for my Dob so I am sure I will have to just play around with what I am trying to take pictures of to get results.

I have only two currently for the scope. A 7mm and a 20mm which gives me a magnification factor of 290 and 100 respectively. I currently can only piggyback using my regular camera lenses since the primary and secondary mirrors have deteriorated and need replaced. It's ok for bright object viewing but not usable for prime focus work. Sorry for the delay in the response but my computers power supply failed and I was down for a few days until I replace it.


"Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
EOS 7D, EOS 350D, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit)
Rick's Digital Desert (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,886 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Comet 17P/Holmes - 7 Oct
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
880 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.