Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 Nov 2007 (Sunday) 08:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I Have "Re-Discovered" My 24-70 EF L

 
JimAskew
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,148 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 1151
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Springfield, VA
     
Nov 11, 2007 08:23 |  #1

Just thought I would state that I have re-discovered my 24-70MM EF L and I am delighted!

I pulled it out of the depths of my bag and put it on my 30D about a month ago to shoot a portriat session and it has remained there ever since. I have done two Halloween parties, two E-Sessions and a vacation trip with it in the past 30 days. Today I am using it to do Fall leaf photos all afternoon.

I have relegated my 17-55MM EF-S IS to the dRebel XT to be shared with my 10-22MM EF-S. Since I don't have another wedding for several months I plan to keep things this way until that event.

As many folks have stated here...the 24-70MM EF L is a fine, fine lens :D I am happy to have found mine again :D


Jim -- I keep the Leica D-Lux 7 in the Glove Box just in case!
7D, G5X, 10-22MM EF-S, 17-55MM f/2.8 EF-S IS, 24-105MM f/4 EF L, Leica D-Lux 7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris ­ McClinch
Junior Member
23 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Nov 11, 2007 08:27 |  #2

Mine rarely leaves my 40D. Great lens, no doubt about it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MDJAK
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
24,745 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 204
Joined Nov 2004
Location: New York
     
Nov 11, 2007 08:41 |  #3

I know exactly what you mean, Jim. There was a time when it felt too bulky to carry around. Then I too rediscovered it and it is my everyday walk around lens, when I'm not using the 70-200 f2.8, that is.

When I do a wedding, the 24-70 is the mainstay for almost the entire time. I find it focuses better in low light than the 70-200 or almost any other lens I own.

That's why I'm quite intrigued by Nikon's new version which is considerably slimmed down. My guess is this is the next lens due for an update.

mark




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 11, 2007 08:41 |  #4

Yep. Could do for a trim and addition of IS. I'd probably get one.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChucklesKY
Senior Member
Avatar
353 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bluegrass, KY
     
Nov 11, 2007 09:20 as a reply to  @ cdifoto's post |  #5

"The Brick" stays on my 40D 99% of the time. Of course, part of that is because I don't have my 70-200 f2.8L IS . . .yet.:o


Canon EOS 40D || 10-22mm EF-S || 24-70mm f/2.8L ||70-200mm f/2.8L IS || 50mm f/1.8 II || 60mm f/2.8 Macro EF-S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Master-9
Senior Member
Avatar
764 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Decatur, Ga.
     
Nov 11, 2007 09:32 |  #6

my 24-70 is my go to lens


From Decatur Georgia(USA)

Canon 40D+ BG-E2N, Canon 20D, Canon PowerShot G12, Canon PowerShot G7, Canon Rebel(Film)EF-S 18-55mm f4-5.6, EF 28mm f2.8, EF 50mm f1.8 Mk I, EF 85mm f1.8 USM, EF 24-70 f2.8L USM, EF 70-200mm f4L USM, Canon Speedlite 420 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scot079
Goldmember
Avatar
3,839 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: Maryland USA
     
Nov 11, 2007 10:31 |  #7

I'd rather have a 24-105 f/2.8L IS, but wouldn't we all. I love my 24-70/70-200 combo!


- Tim
www.timadkinsphoto.com (external link)
GEARandFEEDBACK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thatkatmat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,342 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 205
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold
     
Nov 11, 2007 10:54 |  #8

Either would be good for me, as long as they keep it sharp 24-105/2.8 IS might be a giant of a lens though


My Flickr (external link)
Stuff
"Never rat on your friends and always keep your mouth shut." -Jimmy Conway
a9, 12-24/4G, 24-70/2.8GM, 100-400GM, 25/2 Batis, 55/1.8ZA, 85 /1.8FE, 85LmkII, 135L...a6300,10-18/4, 16-50PZ, 18-105PZ

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ultimate ­ CC
Goldmember
Avatar
1,480 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Nov 11, 2007 10:59 |  #9

I just recently got the 24-70 and love it...its on camera 90% of the time...


My Gear And For Sale Items
www.danhonovich.com (external link)
www.danhonovich.blogsp​ot.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Nov 11, 2007 11:02 |  #10

JimAskew wrote in post #4294686 (external link)
Just thought I would state that I have re-discovered my 24-70MM EF L and I am delighted!

I pulled it out of the depths of my bag and put it on my 30D about a month ago to shoot a portriat session and it has remained there ever since. I have done two Halloween parties, two E-Sessions and a vacation trip with it in the past 30 days. Today I am using it to do Fall leaf photos all afternoon.

I have relegated my 17-55MM EF-S IS to the dRebel XT to be shared with my 10-22MM EF-S. Since I don't have another wedding for several months I plan to keep things this way until that event.

As many folks have stated here...the 24-70MM EF L is a fine, fine lens :D I am happy to have found mine again :D

welcome back Jim. there's no place like home :D!

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MagentaJoe
psycho clown
Avatar
1,357 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Having breakfast at the circus, with the lions and the clowns.
     
Nov 11, 2007 11:43 |  #11

Yeah the 24-70 is great. It's always on unless I am bored and feel like shooting something different.


Arguing with a psycho clown can be harmful to your funny bone.
5D-Grip, 40D, 35f2, 50f1.4, 85f1.8,100f2.8macro, 135f2.8sf, 17-40f4L, 24-70f2.8L, 100-400f4.5-5.6isL, 580ex, 420ex, 430ex, 430ez
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=442750

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Artdime
Senior Member
Avatar
273 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: DFW
     
Nov 11, 2007 12:12 as a reply to  @ MagentaJoe's post |  #12

I just got mine as well, and noticed that there is a little bit of play in the focus ring. Does anyone else have that as well? I am a little disappointed because I expected perfect built quality. My 17-40 has no play at all.

But yeah, nice lens overall. Not sure though if I'll keep it.

Florian


- Florian
http://artdime.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scot079
Goldmember
Avatar
3,839 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: Maryland USA
     
Nov 11, 2007 12:16 |  #13

Artdime wrote in post #4295586 (external link)
I just got mine as well, and noticed that there is a little bit of play in the focus ring. Does anyone else have that as well? I am a little disappointed because I expected perfect built quality. My 17-40 has no play at all.

But yeah, nice lens overall. Not sure though if I'll keep it.

Florian

Yeah I think that's normal for the lens, it wouldn't call it an imperfection though, just a trait.


- Tim
www.timadkinsphoto.com (external link)
GEARandFEEDBACK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 11, 2007 12:18 |  #14

Artdime wrote in post #4295586 (external link)
I just got mine as well, and noticed that there is a little bit of play in the focus ring. Does anyone else have that as well?

Mine's got a little bit.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Artdime
Senior Member
Avatar
273 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: DFW
     
Nov 11, 2007 12:27 as a reply to  @ cdifoto's post |  #15

Thanks guys, makes me feel better that it seems to be normal with this lens.


- Florian
http://artdime.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,489 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
I Have "Re-Discovered" My 24-70 EF L
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
903 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.