Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 12 Nov 2007 (Monday) 17:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

General Question

 
sl3966
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Annapolis, MD
     
Nov 12, 2007 17:02 |  #1

Ok I have been working on setting up my business and I have the branding and name and stuff all set up. I am looking at the other photographers in the area and I am noticing that they are guaranteeing brides at least 800-1000 photos (prints) for 8 hours of coverage. Is this a common thing? I am hesitant about promising an certain number of prints to a client. Depending on the number of hours I am shooting I cull around 10-25% on average. Maybe I have a horrible ratio but I don't think I have ever given a bride 800 photos from one day of shooting.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 12, 2007 17:17 |  #2

Think different: offer 300 quality prints instead of 800 average ones. If you give a bride 800 prints (which is a stack about six inches high) they're overwhelmed usually, it's just too many prints.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sl3966
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Annapolis, MD
     
Nov 12, 2007 17:40 |  #3

Thanks Tim thats what I was thinking, less prints or a print credit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Niraj
Senior Member
Avatar
859 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Nov 12, 2007 17:41 |  #4

What are the brides in the area expecting to receive from 8 hours of shooting?
Perhaps the local photographers have been "spoiling" them with so many prints. This could be the perfect time for you to step in and offer a different perspective to the brides.


Niraj Popat | www.nirajpopat.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kathy ­ H
" it's a very handsome sheep! "
Avatar
7,622 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Western USA
     
Nov 12, 2007 17:41 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #5

I agree with Tim, too many is overwhelming and then the bride has to cull them too!


Kathy H
BLOG (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 12, 2007 18:25 |  #6

I tell people I give them around 300 images, and tell them how long it'd take if they had to look through every image I took and decide which if the 3-4 of each group shot to choose. Culling's a service, sell it as such.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howzitboy
Goldmember
2,948 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Hawaii
     
Nov 13, 2007 02:40 |  #7

800-1000? thats crazy! think how long it would take to let the bride choose which ones would go into the album!!
id say 300 good shots is more then enough.


http://onehourwedding.​blogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notapro
Goldmember
Avatar
2,540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Southwestern Ontario
     
Nov 13, 2007 03:54 |  #8

to offer 800 photos seems excessive because either they are providing multiple versions of the same shot (only a bonus for certain key moments perhaps, or if different POV on same moment) or they are shooting like madmen and providing a lot of snapshots. That's how it seems to me anyway. I guess the other option is that they have a few photographers all capturing unique perspectives and covering different areas of the wedding, but this seems unlikely and unnecessary for a typical wedding.


Amanda

Ontario Wedding Photographer  (external link)| My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,111 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
General Question
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is RawBytes
1531 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.