Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 16 Nov 2007 (Friday) 18:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why does flash create a black background?

 
EWek11
Member
Avatar
125 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: New York, NY
     
Nov 16, 2007 18:15 |  #1

I know it happens, but I don't think I understand why...Why when you shoot with full flash does the background go black?


Still rockin the silver xti

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ibdb
TD's worst nightmare!
Avatar
6,484 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Puyallup -- Don't worry. Nobody else can pronounce it either.
     
Nov 16, 2007 18:25 |  #2

Short answer: It doesn't have to.

Longer answer: Each flash exposure is two exposures. One for the ambient light, and one for the flash. If you set your ambient light exposure such that it's significantly underexposed, you'll get the black background (black hole) effect. If you set your ambient light exposure (in the case of a black hole, longer shutter or wider aperture) closer to correct, you'll eliminate the black hole.

If your flash can't illuminate the entire scene, which is more than likely, you're going to need to use different camera settings. Try a flash shot in AV mode. Give you closer to what you're looking for?

There's a ton more information, and by people who are a lot smarter about this than I am, in the lighting forum. Check it out.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=138907


-David
"David raises a good point. . ." -- CDS
"Once again, David Raises a good point! :lol:" The Wise and Powerful CDS
Gear List | Proof I Use The Gear In My Gear List (not necessarily proof I use it well) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_B
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,355 posts
Gallery: 178 photos
Likes: 2722
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawaii
     
Nov 16, 2007 18:37 |  #3

EWek11,
A simple answer is:
The flash wasn't set strong enough to reach and reflect back from the background to make it show up in photo.
Here is an example
Weed Seed

IMAGE: http://johnbdigital.com/macro/weed_seed.jpg
click for specsIMAGE LINK: http://johnbdigital.co​m/macro/weed_seed.htm  (external link)
In this photo the background was a wood wall that was 15ft behind the subject. With the shutter speed at 1/200 and the flash was set to make the foreground (the seed) well lit but not strong enough to give enough light for the wall. Because of this the sensor (same would happen with film) show no light in background, no light = black :)

Sony A6400, A6500, Apeman A80, & a bunch of Lenses.............  (external link)
click to see (external link)
JohnBdigital.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Nov 16, 2007 19:00 |  #4

Another key is to understand that flash power decreases at the square of the distance. So in all cases where flash is the main/only source of illumination subjects that are half the distance from the camera as the background will be four times brighter. Subjects that are 1/3rd the distance from the background will be nine times brighter.

This is why it is a good idea to look up the term "dragging the shutter" to improve your flash photography.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rammy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,189 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2004
Location: London, England
     
Nov 17, 2007 12:10 |  #5

ibdb wrote in post #4329380 (external link)
Short answer: It doesn't have to.

Longer answer: Each flash exposure is two exposures. One for the ambient light, and one for the flash. If you set your ambient light exposure such that it's significantly underexposed, you'll get the black background (black hole) effect. If you set your ambient light exposure (in the case of a black hole, longer shutter or wider aperture) closer to correct, you'll eliminate the black hole.

If your flash can't illuminate the entire scene, which is more than likely, you're going to need to use different camera settings. Try a flash shot in AV mode. Give you closer to what you're looking for?

There's a ton more information, and by people who are a lot smarter about this than I am, in the lighting forum. Check it out.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=138907

I agree with David on this. It is all about the ambient exposure and the flash exposure when you want to get a flashed pic that doesn't look like a P&S flashed pic or a blacked out background. Check out the link he posted, great info there.

You could increase the flash exposure to try and capture some of the background too (check the guide number for the 580EX for the ISO you are using). But then, I find it looks like a "flashed" pic and you may still have some dark or black parts, the further back in the scene you go. The foreground subject will get too overexposed by the flash exposure though if you try this!

What is important, I think, is that you should set the camera to expose for the background ambient light and then let the flash expose the foreground subject. Use FEC to dial down or up the flash for the foreground subject. I usually dial down the flash so that the subject isn't overly flashed. E-TTL with the camera set to manual mode, should do a good job for you. Don't worry if the subjects are moving and the shutter speed is way too low. The flash will "capture" them. If the objects in the background is moving (people or camera shake) then use a tripod or secure yourself of the camera because the settings you set in the camera for the ambient light will probably not be quick enough to freeze them.

John_B, if you would have reduced your shutter speed down to something like 1/4 or even 0.3 sec or slower then the background would have exposed with the flash illuminating the foreground subject.

JeffreyG, yep agree, dragging the shutter (to expose for the ambient light) is the way to go.

If the background is completely dark anyway then dragging the shutter won't help and increasing the flash power will mean an over exposed subject. In that case, a second flash unit or a lamp ot some moveable light source to illuminate the background would help.

Do you have an example with settings used?


Gear | Surrey Wedding Photographer (external link) | Surrey Wedding Photographer Blog (external link) | London Architecture Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rammy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,189 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2004
Location: London, England
     
Nov 17, 2007 12:48 |  #6

Here is my example to try and show what I mean. The "principle" is STILL the same whether shotting a scene like this, a large room with fall off, outside etc.

Note: These are technical pics, they have no artistic value :lol:

Full EXIF is intact.

Setup: The lights in this room are OFF. The lights in the kitchen or ON and dimmed down.

See how the first pic does NOT show the ambient light through the doors into the kitchen? That is because of the relatively fast shutter speed of 1/60.

ISO: 400, Aperture F/4, Shutter: 1/60, Onboard flash no FEC.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


The only thing I changed is the shutter speed to slow it down (drag the shutter).

Now you CAN see the ambient light through the door and into the kitchen.

ISO: 400, Aperture F/4, Shutter: 0.4 sec, Onboard flash no FEC.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Summary. Using the first settings, anything or anyone in the room would be exposed by the flash and the background black. With the second settings, the things or people in the room would still be exposed and the slower shutter speed would also capture the ambient light in the back of the scene.

Gear | Surrey Wedding Photographer (external link) | Surrey Wedding Photographer Blog (external link) | London Architecture Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EWek11
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
125 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: New York, NY
     
Nov 17, 2007 14:08 as a reply to  @ rammy's post |  #7

Everyone-
Thanks for the examples and the info. I definitely understand this concept much better now. I also shot almost a hundred shots today with the on-board flash and many different settings and I think I have a clear understanding of these principles now. So thanks so much for that!:D

Now, as far as FEC goes, how does one know how much is needed? Once the shot is metered for the background, and then the subject is added in front of this background, is it trail and error (and experience obviously) or are there some rules of thumb to apply?


Still rockin the silver xti

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rammy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,189 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2004
Location: London, England
     
Nov 17, 2007 14:50 |  #8

EWek11 wrote in post #4333611 (external link)
Now, as far as FEC goes, how does one know how much is needed? Once the shot is metered for the background, and then the subject is added in front of this background, is it trail and error (and experience obviously) or are there some rules of thumb to apply?

Always do a test shot or two with your settings with a test subject. Find someone (if it is people) who will stand there for a couple of test shots. Adjust the FEC if the subject is too bright (blown highlights) or too dark, for the ambient light.

Then you can happily snap away once you have done your test shots and as the light changes, compared to your test shots, you can adjust accordingly.


Gear | Surrey Wedding Photographer (external link) | Surrey Wedding Photographer Blog (external link) | London Architecture Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ibdb
TD's worst nightmare!
Avatar
6,484 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Puyallup -- Don't worry. Nobody else can pronounce it either.
     
Nov 17, 2007 15:03 as a reply to  @ rammy's post |  #9

Agreed. Experience will help a lot -- but your camera has a histogram. Take advantage of it.


-David
"David raises a good point. . ." -- CDS
"Once again, David Raises a good point! :lol:" The Wise and Powerful CDS
Gear List | Proof I Use The Gear In My Gear List (not necessarily proof I use it well) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,793 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Why does flash create a black background?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1111 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.