Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 28 Aug 2004 (Saturday) 08:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Microdrive reliability

 
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,333 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Aug 28, 2004 08:36 |  #1

The conventional logic on this forum seems to be that microdrives are inherently unreliable and should be avoided in favour of solid state compact flash cards.

I understand and agree with the logic behind this.

For me however, theory doesn’t seem to match with reality. I own three microdrives, two of which have been very heavily used over a period of nearly 3 years now (I would estimate one has done @27,000 images and one has done @50,000 images) without a single problem. They’ve been dropped and suffered the same lack of care as my solid state cards get and they are still going strong.

Now, leaving aside the horrid MagicStor things which we all know don’t work in Canon dSLRs, how many real cases of microdrive failure have you personally had?


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport (external link)/Canoe Polo (external link)/Other Stuff (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Aug 28, 2004 11:25 |  #2

Cadwell:

I agree with you...obviously I do becuase I just bought a 4gig Microdrive myself. I think there might have been reliability issues at one point with the earliest units, and then there was the problem with the 2.2G drives sold by Magicstor that had a lot of problems. I'm quite satisfied that they are much better now than they used to be.

On the other hand, I only use the microdrive when I think there's a good chance I might need the extra capacity. Otherwise, I use a 1-gig CF card.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdude85
Senior Member
391 posts
Joined Jul 2004
     
Aug 28, 2004 11:54 |  #3

I have had one. I bought a camera online from Ebay and it came with a 340 mb IBM microdrive... I have no idea how it has been used in the past, but it appeared clean and in working order. Anyway, I took about 200 shots with it over the period of a few days. When I went to put the microdrive in my reader, it worked fine. However, I tried yanking it out of the device when the little light was still on (but no pictures were transferring). The next time I tried putting the microdrive in, it clicked, whirred, and died. (the death was accompanied by a repetitive, sickening siren-like whisper coming from inside the drive). While I know that pulling a card out of a drive is not recommended with first "shutting down the drive" in windows, I have never encountered ANY problems from yanking out solid state CF cards or USB pendrives. They don't completely BREAK. The worst warning you can get from the company is that there will be a "loss of data," which of course i've never encountered...the whole thing shouldn't shut down and die! They suck! Don't buy a microdrive.

That's just my two sense.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roger_Cavanagh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,394 posts
Joined Sep 2001
     
Aug 28, 2004 13:45 |  #4

I love the way that people manage to generalise from a sample of one.

Don't play frisbee with MDs or CFs and don't "yank" them out of the drive.

And don't use the 340 meg MDs - they had a lot more problems reported than the 1 gig version ever did.

My two 1gig IBM MDs (the oldest more than 3 years old) still appear (fingers crossed) to be working fine.

Regards,


=============
Roger Cavanagh
www.rogercavanagh.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jrm
Member
108 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
Aug 28, 2004 14:25 |  #5

I used to be in the "pro-microdrive" camp, until my recent vacation.

I have had a 1GB Hitachi/IBM microdrive since last December. It initially received light use, and then I bought a 512MB CF card as a "spare." This spare became my primary card. Since my laptop is almost always nearby, I was always able to download shots off the CF card before needing additional storage.

A few weeks ago I went on a cruise to Alaska. Up at Hubbard Glacier, I kept shooting and filled up the CF card. Took out the microdrive and almost filled that up )over 100 RAW shots).

As we were leaving Hubbard, I went back to my room and downloaded all the pics. Per my usual routine, I put the card back in the camera and reformat to celar the card.

When I did this, the mircodrive just made some "whirring" sounds and the camera gave an error message. Tried putting it back in the card reader, and wouldn't mount.

Bottom line - card is dead. I almost had a heart attack, thinking I lost my whole day of shooting. Forntunately, the pictures were downloaded before the card died.

This is a card that received light use, was never dropped, mishandled or exposed to extreme conditions. No idea why it decided to go.

I am now a convert. I will probably not even use the replacement I hope to get through warranty. I no longer trust the technology.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rsnadel
Member
147 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
Aug 28, 2004 14:58 |  #6

I have two 1Gb MDs which have never had problems (knock on wood). But I also added CFs over time as prices dropped and don't really use the MDs any more.

As I recall, the issues that early digital camera users complained about regarding Microdrives were:

* slower read/write times
* moving parts (vs. CF cards being solid state), which can break over time
* potential for problems when used at higher altitudes (don't exactly remember why)
* reliability problems with 340Mb drives (mentioned previously)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadenza
Senior Member
440 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay
     
Aug 28, 2004 15:10 |  #7

Microdrives are cool!

But microdrives are cool! They have metal casing and
screws, seem much more real than an overpriced
chip cased in cheap plastic! :-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Aug 28, 2004 16:00 |  #8

Cadenza wrote:
But microdrives are cool! They have metal casing and
screws, seem much more real than an overpriced
chip cased in cheap plastic! :-)

Gee, I'd even more like to have the steam-powered version :lol:

Let's get serious ... I have two microdrives, one I bought with my G2 2 years ago and the other one i got from my company to back up the mailfile from my laptop.

I haven't had problems with either of them so far, apart from the plastic encasing (actually more like adhesive tape) coming off from the newer of the two.

However - whenever I see the remark 'Do not touch here!!!' 'Do not seal the hole!!!' I feel that it is a rather delicate device and that I or somebody else using my camera might one day accidentally destroy it (e.g. drop it, yank it out or else).

Bottom line: nowadays I wouldn't go that route again. Solid state CF cards are so cheap now that the Microdrive does not pose any real advantages - at least not to me.

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichardSimon
Member
44 posts
Joined Jun 2001
     
Aug 28, 2004 18:12 |  #9

I used a microdrive (IBM 1 Gig) heavily for 2.5 years, with no problems. I handled it with care, although there was the occasional drop (nothing severe).

Then it died, for no apparent reason, with no obvious event triggering the failure. I had to retake a few shots, but I was lucky.

At the time I purchased it in 2001 or so, there was better than a factor of two in available storage and price; today, that advantage has disappeared.

For me, the bottom line is that hard drives will eventually fail, and most likely take everything on the drive. I don't know the failure modes for CF drives, but I would expect better reliability. I hate the risk of losing everything all at once!

BTW - hard drives DO have an altitude limit, because the heads in the HD "fly" just above the disk surface. If the air pressure is to low, the probability of failure goes up.

RSS




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,925 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Aug 28, 2004 20:53 |  #10

I am amazed at how sturdy the MDs are!

Sure there are stories of lossed data.. by I don't see any trend towards more MD loos than CF.. in fact the opposite.. the ONLY time I saw a trend was Spring of 2003... at that time on this forum there was a large number of problems with Sandisk standard CF cards..

Since then the Sandisk trend has disappeared to.

I think the biggest issue for the MD is the "potential" seems to be higher.. just based on moving parts.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rob ­ Larsen
Member
125 posts
Joined Jan 2002
     
Aug 29, 2004 02:58 |  #11

I've had (2) 1GB MDs going on 3 years now. Several times they have been knocked of the desk (cats! :mad:) and taken on hikes over 14,000 feet elevation. So far so good.... not a single failure. Got my fingers crossed.

The only issue I've had with them is the write speed. Once the 10D buffer is full it seems to take an agonizing amount of time for it to clear. The 1DM2 improved that situation.

No regrets on the microdrives here.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,312 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
     
Aug 29, 2004 09:37 |  #12

I've got an old original IBM 340 MB microdrive that I've had over three years.. I got it with an old Canon Pro90IS I once owned. I currently use the drive in my pocket PC.. It gets a lot of use. I've dropped the thing a few times. No problems.....

On the other hand.. I just had a Lexar 512MB CF card go bad on me. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nosquare2003
Senior Member
861 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Hong Kong, China
     
Aug 29, 2004 09:43 |  #13

No problem with 1G MD for 2 years.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abel
Senior Member
Avatar
386 posts
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
     
Aug 31, 2004 06:42 |  #14

no probs with my 4g card. used for 7 months and have about 6000 images thru it..

i love it. the freedom of not having to worry about running out of space!!


Abel Longoria
http://www.HoustonPoto​g.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdude85
Senior Member
391 posts
Joined Jul 2004
     
Aug 31, 2004 07:49 |  #15

Roger_Cavanagh wrote:
I love the way that people manage to generalise from a sample of one.

Don't play frisbee with MDs or CFs and don't "yank" them out of the drive.

And don't use the 340 meg MDs - they had a lot more problems reported than the 1 gig version ever did.

My two 1gig IBM MDs (the oldest more than 3 years old) still appear (fingers crossed) to be working fine.

Regards,

If I shouldn't use 340 mb drives because they have problems, why should I risk a lot of money on other faulty drives? It's like Ford saying, "Well, the Taurus has a lot of problems. Don't buy it, but feel free to look at our other models." Riiight.

I've had experience with all sorts of USB, CF, and SD devices. The only one which completely failed when I yanked it out of the computer was the MD. That says something.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,271 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
Microdrive reliability
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1748 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.