Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 28 Aug 2004 (Saturday) 18:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

jaggies at 1024, 1280 etc.

 
Molydood
Senior Member
603 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Essex, UK
     
Aug 28, 2004 18:47 |  #1

just been trying to resize some pictures I have put together for use as windows wallpapers tonight.
problem is, I get a small trace of jaggies when resizing to 1024 or 1280, i here that if you resize in factors of 1,2,3,4,5 etc. you do not get the problem, but is there really no way to get an image into 1024 or 1280 resolution without jaggies?

I tried searching but to no avail.

thanks!
Martin


My real name is Martin
20D (FS 300D), fifty, 18-55, 70-200 f4, tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Aug 28, 2004 21:10 |  #2

What's the size of the original image and what editing program as you using to do the resizing?


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Molydood
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
603 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Essex, UK
     
Aug 29, 2004 08:31 |  #3

using PS 7.0, and origonal image size is 2272*1704


My real name is Martin
20D (FS 300D), fifty, 18-55, 70-200 f4, tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Aug 29, 2004 08:36 |  #4

Image... Image Size... with Bicubic for the method. You should not be getting jaggies if you do it this way.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Molydood
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
603 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Essex, UK
     
Aug 29, 2004 08:52 |  #5

I'm using bicubic, and the jaggies are not really bad, but they are there for sure


My real name is Martin
20D (FS 300D), fifty, 18-55, 70-200 f4, tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Aug 29, 2004 09:34 |  #6

Molydood wrote:
I'm using bicubic, and the jaggies are not really bad, but they are there for sure

Are you viewing the image at 100% or at a higher magnification? There's not reason why you should have "jaggies" when viewing at 100%.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Molydood
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
603 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Essex, UK
     
Aug 29, 2004 10:38 |  #7

yep, 100% view
maybe I shold try it with a few more examples as it may be an isolated case


My real name is Martin
20D (FS 300D), fifty, 18-55, 70-200 f4, tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,735 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
jaggies at 1024, 1280 etc.
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1209 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.